Thread: Illegal Parents Could be Split from US-born children

Another tear-jerker guys.

http://nctimes.com/articles/2006/05/...2206152259.txt

Immigrant debate could split illegal parents from U.S.-born children

By: GIOVANNA DELL'ORTO - Associated Press Writer

NORCROSS, Ga. (AP) -- Laila Montezuma was 16 when she sneaked across the Rio Grande from Mexico with her mother, only to be abandoned by the smuggler paid to get them into the United States. They had to hire another "coyote" to reach Houston.

But Montezuma's own daughter will be spared those struggles. Even if Montezuma and her husband are both deported for being illegal immigrants, little Alma could eventually return to enjoy the opportunities her parents sought here.

"She's not going to have to fight for anything for the simple fact that she was born here," Montezuma said as her infant daughter played in a waiting room at a pediatrics clinic in suburban Atlanta.


About 2 million families face the risk of being split up because the children are U.S.-born citizens but the parents are illegal immigrants. At least one lawmaker has proposed ending citizenship by birthright, restricting automatic citizenship at birth to children of U.S. citizens and legal residents.

The United States has one of the most liberal citizenship policies in the world, granting citizenship to anyone born on U.S. soil based on an 1868 constitutional amendment. About 3.1 million children are U.S. citizens by birth, even though one or both of their parents are here illegally, according to estimates by the Pew Hispanic Center.

Supporters of that measure say it is the only way to fully integrate immigrants.

"A person has a stake in the society where they are, and you can't beat that as an integration measure," said Demetrios Papademetriou, president of the Migration Policy Institute, a Washington think tank.

But critics who want to eliminate the right insist it is a magnet for illegal immigration and an obstacle in efforts to deport millions of illegal immigrants.

"It's not as large a magnet as jobs, but it will be easier to solve the problem of illegal immigration if we avoid the mixed-family situation," said Rep. Nathan Deal, R-Ga., who tried unsuccessfully to revoke the citizenship-by-birth right in the immigration bill passed by the House in December.

Deal and other advocates of stricter controls say immigrants come to the U.S. in part to have "anchor babies" -- children who can offer their parents some immunity from deportation and then petition for them to receive green cards after turning 21. But just how many immigrants do so is unclear.

Border Patrol agents rescue one or two immigrants in labor every year.

Daniel McClafferty, part of a Border Patrol medical team, found an 18-year-old woman in shock with her newborn daughter last month about 20 miles north of the border in the desolate foothills of the Arizona desert.

A fellow immigrant had helped deliver the baby, cutting her umbilical cord with a nail clipper. McClafferty helped evacuate the mother on a helicopter and carry the baby to the closest road, four miles away.

Alejandro Ramos with the Mexican consulate in Tucson, Ariz., said the mother had asked for a U.S. birth certificate for her daughter, but her whereabouts were unknown.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers try not to separate families but they do "arrest and remove people every day who have dependents in the U.S.," said agency spokesman Marc Raimondi.

Immigrants who are ordered deported can ask a judge to let them stay if, among other things, they are able to prove their deportation would be an "extremely unusual hardship" to a U.S.-citizen spouse or child.

Immigration judges typically consider whether children can speak the language of their parents' native country, whether they have enough money to survive and whether they have serious health problems, said Elaine Komis of the Executive Office of Immigration Review, which runs federal immigration courts.

Even though Luz Maria Medrano of Las Vegas was ordered deported along with her second husband, the couple won permanent residency after a six-year legal battle when a judge found her 7-year-old, U.S.-born son would not receive proper treatment for his learning disability in Mexico.

She's especially happy for her other 17-year-old son, who was born in Mexico. She carried him across the Arizona desert when he was 12 months old to flee an abusive ex-husband.

"I felt very responsible," said Medrano, a 40-year-old real estate agent. "It was for him that I would have suffered more if they had sent us to Mexico. Now the future for him will be grandiose. Here, whatever you do, you'll be successful at."

Back at the suburban Atlanta clinic serving Spanish-speaking families, Irma Baldonado recalled being two months pregnant when she immigrated illegally to California. She left her first-born daughter in El Salvador with her mother and has not seen the child in seven years. She hopes her two children who were born here will one day get papers for their 10-year-old sister to join them.

"It's what I wish for the most," Baldonado said. "Then it will all have been worth it."

I think that is such crap! That someone who breaks our laws and comes into this country and has children (for US to support no doubt) and these children are now automatically considered citizens?????

What other countries do this? So if a US family were taking a vacation in Canada while the mother was pregnant and the mother ended up giving birth while there....does that mean that child is a Canadian citizen automatically? If a father works for a German owned business and the family goes on a business trip to Stuttgart and the mother had given birth there...is that child now a German citizen by legal right????

This is the most out of whack policy I have ever heard and I can't believe no one has ever looked into changing it. Anchor babies AWAY!!!!!

For gosh sakes, there's still people unaccounted for in the wake of Katrina and children STILL missing.

Now THAT'S tear-jerking news but this illegal whining has got to stop!

The parents of those children are law breakers, no sympathy here. They knew they were breaking the law and it's ALL the parent's fault if these families are separated. I just wish they would do away with birthright citizenship, it's one of the reasons so many have illegally crossed our borders, just for the free healthcare and welfare that comes along with that baby.

Originally Posted by rebellady1964

The parents of those children are law breakers, no sympathy here. They knew they were breaking the law and it's ALL the parent's fault if these families are separated. I just wish they would do away with birthright citizenship, it's one of the reasons so many have illegally crossed our borders, just for the free healthcare and welfare that comes along with that baby.

Im with you on this one, no sympathy here either!

The 14th Amendment needs a serious addressing ASAP!

Many Americans will be torn by these types of articles - that is the purpose. We've been 'conditioned' to feel sorry and we do. But where are our priorities? We are a nation of laws first and foremost. Exceptions have become the rule. Charity after all begins at home. We can't help anyone if we can't help ourselves.

The 14th Amendment was passed in 1868 in order to secure American citizenship for frmer slaves. The ex-slaves were living under the legal jurisdiction of the United States. Many slaves risked their lives crossing th Confederate line to turn themselves into Union officers only a few years before. Granting birthright citizenship to the children of illegals is the result of an interpretation and not inherent in the 14th Amendment. The illegal aliens by contrast to the slaves are here in defiance and contempt of our jurisdiction. If they were under our jurisdiction they would turn themselves into the ICE as soon as they got here.