Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member Dixie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Texas - Occupied State - The Front Line
    Posts
    35,072

    Farmers Branch - FB's Rental Ban Could Be Delayed

    http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent ... c2d7.html#

    Council may opt to not enforce migrant rules until election

    08:44 AM CST on Sunday, January 7, 2007
    By STEPHANIE SANDOVAL / The Dallas Morning News

    Farmers Branch officials are considering holding off on enforcement of an ordinance banning apartments from renting to illegal immigrants until voters weigh in on the matter in May, Mayor Bob Phelps said.

    The measure's opponents submitted a petition last month that forces the City Council on Monday to decide whether to repeal the ordinance or put it to a public vote in May.

    Mr. Phelps and some political observers in Farmers Branch expect the council to call an election.

    The ordinance, which requires apartment management to obtain proof that people leasing or renewing leases with them are U.S. citizens or in the country legally, is slated to take effect Friday.

    But the council has the option of instructing staff not to enforce the ordinance at this time and to wait to see what the voters decide.

    "I think it will be considered," Mr. Phelps said. "I can't speak for the City Council, but some of them have said they think that may be a wise thing to do."

    Council member Tim O'Hare, the driving force behind the ordinance against illegal immigrants, said he hopes the council does not put off implementing it.

    "While I'm all in favor of the public having a vote, I believe we should go ahead with implementing the ordinance," he said. "And if voters ask us to repeal the ordinance [in the election], then we can cease enforcement of it immediately."

    He said the issue is not about what he or the council wants, but what the residents want.

    "If the people of Farmers Branch don't want this ordinance in place, then we shouldn't do it," he said. "I think you'll find residents are overwhelmingly supportive of the ordinance, and it will pass with flying colors. ... I think this vote will give us the answer."

    City Council member Jim Smith said he was undecided on whether to implement the ordinance or hold off until the vote.

    "There's so much involved in this thing, I really don't know what to do," he said.

    Council members Ben Robinson and Bill Moses did not return calls seeking comment Friday.

    Council member Charlie Bird said he was unaware of the option to postpone implementation, but he declined to comment further.

    Escondido, Calif., decided not to enforce a similar ordinance after the city was sued. A court issued an injunction preventing a similar rental ordinance from being enforced in Hazleton, Pa.

    And Bridgeport, Pa., recently agreed not to enforce an ordinance the city approved in November that prohibits illegal immigrants from renting or working in the borough. The decision was intended to forestall a court injunction, according to news reports.

    Three lawsuits have been filed in connection with the Farmers Branch ordinance, and on Jan. 22, a court is expected to hold a hearing on a request for an injunction halting implementation of the ordinance.

    Resident Jim Manning, a staunch opponent of the ordinance, said he hopes the council will repeal the ordinance rather than hold a referendum.

    "Some of the City Council members have, I think, regretted making the decision in November, and if they had the opportunity [again] I think they might vote against it," he said.

    "That would give the council a chance to stand up and do what's right."

    Tim Koch, who supports the ordinance, said that he believes the matter will go to a public vote but that he would be disappointed if the council suspends enforcement until the election.

    "I think I've heard from at least two of them that they are very likely to say it's on the books and we're going to continue with enforcement," he said. "I'd be a little bit surprised if [Mayor Phelps] is right on that."

    Whatever the council does Monday, elected officials and residents alike are eager to get the matter resolved.

    "Every time you think this has kind of gotten to a point it's over, it rears its ugly head again," said Tim Scott, who backs the ordinance.

    "I'd as soon vote on it tomorrow and let the chips fall where they may."

    The debate over illegal immigration has raged in Farmers Branch since August, when Mr. O'Hare first made public his desire to impose local restrictions.

    The earliest the city could have a referendum is May 12, along with the council elections, because that is the next uniform election date.

    Mr. Phelps said he believes a public vote, not repealing the ordinance, is the right thing to do.

    "That way, it puts the whole deal to bed anyway," he said.

    But Mr. Manning said calling an election will only stretch out the debate.

    "That's going to keep the whole city in suspense until May – four months – on what's going to happen, and the turmoil is going to continue," he said.

    E-mail ssandoval@dallasnews.com
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member Dixie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Texas - Occupied State - The Front Line
    Posts
    35,072
    http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/opinion ... 398361.htm

    Letters to the Editor

    Jan. 06, 2007

    Immigrants and Farmers BranchStar-Telegram

    I'm grateful to the media for covering the situation in Farmers Branch and the problems we face with immigration. But I ask you to please stop characterizing this issue as Mexicans vs. white people. Of course, you don't use that headline, but the reporting often is framed that way.

    Yes, this is an issue of discrimination against Hispanics. Yes, many of the activists are Hispanic. But there are as many non-Hispanics in the fight because this is an issue of American values. It has taken 40 years, but it's no longer acceptable to discriminate against a group of people based on race, language, etc. In fact, it's illegal in most cases.

    A headline that would reflect what's really happening might read: "90 percent of signatures on Farmers Branch petition are non-Hispanic." Furthermore, most of the volunteers in the drive were non-Hispanic.

    In the next few months, we'll work hard to forward our message about why the actions of the Farmers Branch City Council are wrong. It's all of us against bad ideas.

    Co-chairman Christopher McGuire, Uniting Farmers Branch

    How can anyone not understand the difference between bigotry and breaking the law? Anyone breaking the law should be held accountable. It doesn't matter if the lawbreakers were born in the United States, became naturalized citizens or entered without going through the proper legal channels. If they break the law, something must be done about it.

    I applaud the Farmers Branch City Council for taking a step to curb the illegal activity that's running rampant in our state and country. If only the federal government would become as active in this endeavor.

    Another point often overlooked is the exploitation of people who are here illegally. They have no voice to object to working too many hours overtime, not being paid because of a whim of a supervisor, no paid days off for illness, etc. Those who assert that people should be allowed to live here illegally should think about the kind of country we'll have in a few years if enforcement of existing laws is overlooked.

    Rebecca Thompson, Flower Mound

    Theodore Roosevelt stated his views on immigration in this way:

    "In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else."

    Notice that he said immigrant, not illegal immigrant.

    Roosevelt then stated: "This is predicated upon the person's becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American."

    And, most important: "We have room for but one flag, the American flag. ... We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language. ... and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people."

    It's the arrogance of the protesters -- in large part illegal immigrants -- in insisting on "bilingual" everything and displaying the Mexican flag that tells me they deserve one thing: a trip to the border and a push across.

    Ronald L. Weston, Arlington
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,021
    Predictable....... We talk everything to death. The Japanese should have waited 60 years to bonb Pearl Harbor they would be waiting years for us to get back to them.

  4. #4
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    65,443
    http://www.nbc5i.com/news/10694699/detail.html

    Farmers Branch To Decide On Anti-Illegal Immigration Measures
    Businesses File Suit Against City

    POSTED: 8:29 am CST January 8, 2007
    UPDATED: 9:41 am CST January 8, 2007


    FARMERS BRANCH, Texas -- The Farmers Branch City Council will decide on Monday what to do with controversial anti-illegal immigration measures set to take effect Friday.

    Last year, the council passed an ordinance, which makes English the city's official language and punishes landlords who rent to illegal immigrants.


    An opposition petition now forces city leaders to either repeal the measure, or put it to a public vote.

    A lawyer said he would file a class action lawsuit on behalf of 35 merchants in Farmers Branch.

    They said the new rules are hurting their businesses.

    “We don't believe the City of Farmers Branch has the power or the right to deny clientele to come into the community,” lawyer Forest Nelson said.

    The ordinance is set to take effect on Jan. 12.
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •