Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member FedUpinFarmersBranch's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    9,603

    Secure Communities to Start in SF on Tues

    Secure Communities to Start in SF on Tues
    By Jude Joffe-Block on Monday, May 31, 11:47am

    Despite Sheriff Michael Hennessey's efforts to opt out, San Francisco will be joining the federal immigration enforcement program, Secure Communities, after all, on Tuesday.

    California's Department of Justice already signed an agreement with Immigration and Customs Enforcement to allow the agency to review fingerprints collected in county jails to determine if those booked are in the country illegally. But it remains unclear whether an individual county can choose not to participate in the program once the state has made an agreement with ICE.

    Last Tuesday, state Attorney General Jerry Brown weighed in and turned down a request Hennessey had made to block ICE from reviewing fingerprints from San Francisco's jail. In a letter, Brown wrote to Hennessey: “Because I think this program serves both public safety and the interest of justice, I am declining your request.â€
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member miguelina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    9,253
    Hennessey has voiced disappointment with Brown's decision. He says Secure Communities violates San Francisco's sanctuary policy, which only allows local officials to report people’s immigration status to federal immigration authorities if they are an adult charged with or convicted of a felony.
    Tough noogies, deal with it! Sanctuary policies violate federal law, why are they allowed to exist??
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
    "

  3. #3
    Senior Member JSealsx4203's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Mexifornia
    Posts
    179
    Quote Originally Posted by miguelina
    Hennessey has voiced disappointment with Brown's decision. He says Secure Communities violates San Francisco's sanctuary policy, which only allows local officials to report people’s immigration status to federal immigration authorities if they are an adult charged with or convicted of a felony.
    Tough noogies, deal with it! Sanctuary policies violate federal law, why are they allowed to exist??
    Exactly.
    We recognize that if you really want to create a job tomorrow, you can remove an illegal alien today

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    TEXAS - The Lone Star State
    Posts
    16,941
    if the federal government would stop sending federal money to sanctuary cities, maybe thinking like this sheriff would change.

    they are already violating federal law by being a sanctuary city

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    340
    Hennessey is a die hard traitor and in bed with Pelosi the Beast, and Gaven "I will sleep with your wife too" Newsom. I knows these people and trust me even if they say they will comply...they will not comply. Just like President OBAMAnation saying he wants secure borders -- well the laws are there enforce them Husein...

    Jamesw62 is correct -- no more money for cities that disobey federal laws -- like my "illegal cesspool" San Francisco.
    Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •