Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member ruthiela's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Sophia, NC
    Posts
    1,482

    Tancredo: Halt 'Security and Prosperity Partnership'

    To view this item online, visit http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/artic ... E_ID=52357

    Monday, October 9, 2006

    THE NEW WORLD DISORDER

    Tancredo: Halt 'Security and Prosperity Partnership'
    Congressman addresses 'North American Union' issue with commerce secretary


    Posted: October 9, 2006
    1:00 a.m. Eastern

    © 2006 WorldNetDaily.com

    WASHINGTON – Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., has asked Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez in a letter to suspend plans that would further a proposal known as the "Security and Prosperity Partnership," until Congress has a chance to examine its goals.

    "I know the administration has given assurances that the SPP is not a veiled effort to create a 'North American Union,' nor an effort designed to dilute American sovereignty by entering into a European Union-like arrangement with Canada and Mexico," said Tancredo, chairman of the Congressional Immigration Reform Caucus. "Unfortunately, however, [the SPP's] 'recommendations' seem to be at odds with those assurances."

    Tancredo, the author of "In Mortal Danger," which exposes what he sees as the crisis of illegal immigration in the U.S., concluded, "As such, I would ask that you consider suspending Commerce Department participation in this tri-lateral effort."

    (Story continues below)

    Tancredo is one of four members of Congress who has signed on to a resolution designed to express "the sense of Congress that the United States should not engage in the construction of a North American Free Trade Agreement Superhighway System or enter into a North American Union with Mexico and Canada."

    Several alarming "recommendations" from the U.S. component of the "North American Competitive Council" suggested that the U.S., Canada and Mexico "work toward acceptance of equivalent standards, objectives, surveillance and enforcement," Tancredo noted.

    In the section on pandemic control, the Council recommends that "…all borders and major roads remain open … to allow the unimpeded flow of domestic and international commerce."

    Tancredo said the most troubling recommendations appear in the section entitled "Improving Cross-Border Mobility (Goods/Services/People)." In that section, the NACC recommends "the governments evaluate moving customs processes further inland…to take the pressure off the border," and to examine "harmonizing commercial processes for clearance of commercial shipments."

    The NACC goes even further, Tancredo said, by recommending "The Secretary of DHS [Department of Homeland Security] … set up a limited short term pass program or otherwise facilitate people who come to the border without documents," and that "... a reasonable grace period should be established at border crossings during which time people without documents are educated about their options and allowed to pass."

    WND first reported on the SPP effort last summer.

    Related offers:

    For a comprehensive look at the U.S. government's plan to integrate the U.S., Mexico and Canada into a North American super-state – guided by the powerful but secretive Council on Foreign Relations – read "ALIEN NATION: SECRETS OF THE INVASION," a special edition of WND's acclaimed monthly Whistleblower magazine.

    Get Tom Tancredo's new book, "In Mortal Danger," from the people who published it – WND Books.

    Previous stories: North American Union threat gets attention of congressmen

    Top U.S. official chaired N. American confab panel

    N. American students trained for 'merger'

    North American confab 'undermines' democracy

    Attendance list North American forum

    North American Forum agenda

    North American merger topic of secret confab

    Feds finally release info on 'superstate'

    Senator ditches bill tied to 'superstate'

    Congressman presses on 'superstate' plan

    Feds stonewalling on 'super state' plan?

    Cornyn wants U.S. taxpayers to fund Mexican development

    No EU in U.S.

    Trans-Texas Corridor paved with campaign contributions?

    U.S.-Mexico merger opposition intensifies

    More evidence of Mexican trucks coming to U.S.

    Docs reveal plan for Mexican trucks in U.S.

    Kansas City customs port considered Mexican soil?

    Tancredo confronts 'superstate' effort

    Bush sneaking North American superstate without oversight?

    Related columns:

    Coming soon to U.S.: Mexican customs office

    Merger with Mexico
    END OF AN ERA 1/20/2009

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    185
    Okay- I'm seeing a great deal of disengenuous rhetoric from Tancredo.
    and others in the House regarding the spp. It's either that- or- they don't read the bills they vote on! I'm wondering why Tancredo and others who are supposedly against the NAU are not exposing the legislation that is being passed in support of the SPP... are these ommisions just appeasement strategy?

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,663
    Quote Originally Posted by LunaLun
    Okay- I'm seeing a great deal of disengenuous rhetoric from Tancredo.
    and others in the House regarding the spp. It's either that- or- they don't read the bills they vote on! I'm wondering why Tancredo and others who are supposedly against the NAU are not exposing the legislation that is being passed in support of the SPP... are these ommisions just appeasement strategy?
    To which specific legislation do you refer?

  4. #4
    Senior Member jp_48504's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    19,168
    I stay current on Americans for Legal Immigration PAC's fight to Secure Our Border and Send Illegals Home via E-mail Alerts (CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP)

  5. #5
    Senior Member Rockfish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    From FLA to GA as of 04/01/07
    Posts
    6,640
    I'm wondering why Tancredo and others who are supposedly against the NAU are not exposing the legislation that is being passed in support of the SPP... are these ommisions just appeasement strategy?
    I believe that they're all being threatened somehow by the WTO, Skull and Bones, the Rhodes Scholar Sociey, the CFR, all of those secret societies that most of corporate execs, most ex-Presidents and a lot of Senators and Congressmen belong to.

    What other reason could a man like Tom Tancredo not be exposing this kind of legislation? JFK warned all of us back then of these secret societies in a speach at Columbia U and how they intend to do away with the United States as we knew it. He refused to join them, except for the Council of Foreign Relations. Then he was assassinated.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •