Thread: Should Mexico Call for a Cease-Fire with Drug Cartels?

Should Mexico Call for a Cease-Fire with Drug Cartels?

By IOAN GRILLO / MEXICO CITY –
Thu Apr 7, 12:20 pm ET

The image of seven corpses of young men and women who had been tortured, murdered and dumped in a car was depressingly familiar in drug war torn Mexico. But unlike thousands of other killings, one victim of last week's multiple homicide in the spa town Cuernavaca had a well-known father and his grief gained national attention.

The journalist and poet Javier Sicilia led a march to commemorate the death of his son and friends, who appear to be an innocent victims caught up in the violence. In the media spotlight, Sicilia said what has been on the mind of many weeping parents. The war on drugs is not working, he cried, the government has to make a truce with cartels. "Drug trafficking goes on. The United States doesn't care, and is not helping us at all," Sicilia told reporters. "The mafias are here. We should make a pact." (See pictures of a Mexican drug gang's "holy war.")

The statement sparked a sizzling public debate, which many Mexicans have conducted in private for years: should the government reach out to criminal gangs to calm the bloodshed? President Felipe Calderon, who kicked off a crackdown on the cartels in December 2006, has insisted that he will never negotiate with criminals. But after 35,000 drug-related murders, car bombs and daily shoot outs, much of the public has grown weary of the war. "There has been an important sea change of opinion," says John Mill Ackerman of Mexico's National Autonomous University. "People are no longer buying the story that things have to get worse before they get better." Calderon is banned by the constitution from running in presidential elections next year, but whoever follows him could be open to any new ideas on Mexico's crime problem.

How any truce could look in reality is a tough question. In a follow up news conference, Sicilia explained that by "pact" he meant that gangsters should be urged to avoid hurting the public and respect the prisoners they take. Others suggest that a truce could simply mean a government decision to chase drug traffickers less and give police more time to tackle anti-social crime such as kidnapping and extortion, which are both rampant. However, there is also a debate whether the government should actually allow one cartel to dominate each trafficking route, thus avoiding the bloody turf wars. This notion is so commonly discussed it even has its own terminology - "repartir plazas" - roughly meaning, "to award turfs." (See pictures of Mexico's drug tunnels.)

Most historians of Mexico argue that the tactic of awarding turfs was employed during the 71-year rule of the Institutional Revolutionary Party or PRI, keeping the country relatively peaceful until the party lost power in 2000. However, PRI leaders deny this claiming that they were simply better at combating crime. Opinion polls show that the PRI is the current favorite to win back the presidency in 2012, helped by many voters who feel it was safer back in the days of one party rule. The PRI's record and policy on drug cartels will likely come under much discussion in the run up to the race.

But many are calling for a change in drug war tactics whoever wins in 2012. Historian Lorenzo Meyer says a public debate about a pact with cartels is long overdue. "The current policy has created violence and chaos that leaves citizens totally unprotected," Meyer said. "A new government could say that there will be no war on drugs in Mexico if there isn't one in the United States. The U.S. government is not stopping drug use, or the flow of weapons or money laundering." American operatives in the drug war have been among the biggest fans of Calderon's offensive. On Tuesday, DEA administrator Michele M. Leonhart praised Calderon for standing firm against cartels while in a conference in the resort of Cancun. Leonhart also emphasized how Calderon pursues "a war without truce" - an apparent stab at Sicilia's comments. (Read "U.S. Agent's Killing Hints at Drug-War Tensions.")

Nevertheless, this year American citizens have been increasingly feeling the pinch of the violence. An American missionary was shot dead in Mexico in January while gunmen slew a U.S. customs agent in February. And on Monday, assailants shot dead two Americans at a border crossing in Tijuana. Motives are unclear in much of the violence that has swept Mexico, including the murder of the seven in Cuernavaca and the discovery on Wednesday of a mass grave with at some 40 bodies in Tamaulipas.

Sicilia's son Francisco was a 24-year old student with no criminal record. According to reports in local newspapers, Francisco Sicilia went with friends to a bar, where they had a loud conversation about the drug violence. Leaving the bar, one of the group reportedly called a family member to say they were being followed. Their bodies were later found in the car next to a note that said, "This is what happens to those who make anonymous calls to soldiers." In the fog of the drug war, the clues point in many directions. Sources quoted by La Jornada newspaper on Tuesday said that rogue soldiers are now suspected in the killing.

Sicilia says there are no words to describe the grief of losing a son. "This pain has no name because it is unnatural," Sicilia wrote in an open letter addressed to politicians and criminals. "From this suffering, from this indignation that these deaths have caused, we are f----- sick of it."

http://news.yahoo.com/

even with a cease fire, the killings will still continue.
these cartels just have too much firepower and do not care for human life

Neither do the corrupt cops on both side of the border. We can't have some cops who are going to risk their lives and do their jobs while the corrupt ones are helping the enemy. I believe there are way too many people on both sides who are filled with greed and have no conscience. Surely after all these years we know who is involved and could have done something about it. I fear it is too late. It is just insane that this has gotten so out of hand and that money matters more than human lives.

that greviing father DISGUSTS me ...... i mean he seriously turns my stomac .... he neither has patrotism in his bones nor gives one WIT about what his son died for ...

sounds to me that according to the article the son was killed for opposing the drug lords ... that son had more corage than his father , who out of shame should really take his own life , coward that he is ..

instead the father disgraces the memory of his son by suggesting that mexico surrender to the drug cartles .... , i'm not even a mexican and this PISSES me off ...