Thread: NAPOLITANO PROTECTS AFGHANISTAN BORDER, IGNORES US

NAPOLITANO PROMISES TO PROTECT AFGHANISTAN BORDER, IGNORES US BORDERS

By NWV News writer Jim Kouri
Posted 1:00 AM Eastern
January 4, 2011
© 2010 NewsWithViews.com

During her New Year holiday trip, Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano met with Afghanistan's President Hamid Karzai to discuss securing the region surrounding the Afghan-Pakistani border. Secretary Napolitano reportedly reinterated America’s commitment to working with Afghanistan to disrupt, dismantle and defeat al Qaeda in the region.

“The Obama administration remains fully committed to combating threats of terrorism in Afghanistan,â€

I'm still waiting for my email to be returned requesting a meeting with Nappy on how to secure the border. I'm assuming they have no interest in my proposal that would close the border with a yearly cost of 25-35 billion and a setup cost of about the same. After all its costing far cheaper to house, educate, give welfare, medicare, feed, and lose taxes over these illegals right?

Remember Nappy, just gimme a call and I can give you a laid out plan of securing the US border in under 6 months!

this is a good idea.

http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-223480-.html

It is about time the states started to charge fees for the remittances. I think they should charge a higher percentage to offset the cost of illegals. The World Bank and and BOA, Western Union and a few more certainly getting their share in fees.

I'm not so sure how well it would float having high remittance fee's. There are many legal immigrants/workers that remit and while I dislike the idea of sending US wealth elsewhere we bring them in to do the work, they do the work, and they earned the money. It could put an unfair burden on those legal immigrant workers especially who do not know how to get reimbursed that amount or them just losing even more in form of taxes all together.

Then how would such fly for people who have a bank account with a bank that is abroad and in the US who can just access from both sides. What about problems with just like western union which wasn't build necassarily for remitances but for being able to sort of wire yourself money when needed or to a friend/family who's traveling if needed.

Lot of blowback or other ways to scam the system and get around. Best bet IMO is just passing laws requiring such places require state/fed ID on the sender end also besides just pickup end. Then pass legislation that to get such ID you have to provide proof of citizenship or legal immigration status.

The World Bank and the other multinational banks and Western Union are making a killing and the majority of the tab for illegals is being picked up by the States.

Exporting wealth should come with a fee. JMO

see related post
http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-223301.html

Originally Posted by AirborneSapper7

Secretary Napolitano also held a roundtable discussion today with Afghan women, as well as U.S. women serving in the region, to hear about efforts underway to advance the role of women in Afghan society. During the discussion, Secretary Napolitano reiterated President Obama’s strong commitment to advancing the rights of women and girls in Afghanistan. However, there was absolutely no discussion of Muslim teachings regarding the low-status of Islamic women. Nor was there a discussion regarding rampant child sex abuse of prepubescent boys by Islamic men in Afghanistan.

OK, nothing she did will enhance security is Afghanistan, but at least she showed 'Bama that she's part of his contiunuous campaigning. He may not be able to do anything about structural unemployment, but at least he's showing concern which might earn him points with female voters - unless they or their husbands or sons are structurally unemployed, of course.
************************************************** ***************************
Americans first in this magnificent country

American jobs for American workers

Fair trade, not free trade