Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member MyAmerica's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    5,074

    DEMOCRATS ALREADY HELD THEIR SPANISH PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE

    THE DEMOCRATS ALREADY HELD THEIR SPANISH PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE!

    The Univision Spanish Democratic Presidential Debate was held Sept. 9, 2997 in Miami. Those participating: Senator Hillary Clinton, Senator Christopher Dodd, Former Senator John Edwards, Former Senator Mike Gravel, Representative Dennis Kucinich, Senator Barack Obama, and Governor Bill Richardson.

    The Democratic debate available in pdf format at:

    http://media.miamiherald.com/smedia/200 ... ate.56.pdf

    Senator Clinton's responce to question about immigration reform in first year:
    Condenses of her responce follows:
    Absolutely. Three aspects to this:
    #1. Work with Congress to get comprehensive legislation. Proud of working with my friend Senator Menendez so that during reform, families aren't separated. In addition to giving a path to citizenship, we want to make sure their families can come along with them. (i.e.....some form of amnesty....She wants to bring in even more via family members and grant them citizenship too!)
    #2. U.S. needs to be a partner with our friends to the south, working together so we can help them address their peoples' needs.(i.e. Give them more of our tax money, jobs and technology.)
    #3. WE HAVE TO EDUCATE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WHY IMMIGRATION IS AS IMPORTANT TODAY AS IT WAS WHEN MY FAMILY IMMIGRATED. (i.e. Brainwash Americans to acceptance. In essence she is saying the American people are dumb and in need of schooling. She should focus on educating herself about the Constitution and what constitues legal and illegal and teaching illegals they have broken the law.)

    *******
    Comments about the upcoming Republican debate are posted on this link: Tom Tancredo hits the nail again.

    http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-93278-repu ... ish+debate
    ********
    How Feds Discourage Immigrant Assimilation:

    http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-93416.html
    *******
    Husband Bill started this entire bilingual mess when he enacted EXECUTIVE ORDER 13166 --with his mere signature and without the voice of the people nor legislation by congress Bill Clinton changed the entire direction of America. Such an order could be expected in a dictatorship but never in a democracy. President Bush has not revoked this order. We must get it revoked.


    http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepage ... O13166.htm

    THE WHITE HOUSE

    Office of the Press Secretary
    (Aboard Air Force One)


    __________________________________________________ _______________________

    For Immediate Release August 11, 2000



    EXECUTIVE ORDER 13166


    IMPROVING ACCESS TO SERVICES FOR
    PERSONS WITH LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY


    By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and
    the laws of the United States of America, and to improve access to
    federally conducted and federally assisted programs and activities for
    persons who, as a result of national origin, are limited in their
    English proficiency (LEP), it is hereby ordered as follows:

    Section 1. Goals.
    The Federal Government provides and funds an array of services that
    can be made accessible to otherwise eligible persons who are not
    proficient in the English language. The Federal Government is
    committed to improving the accessibility of these services to eligible
    LEP persons, a goal that reinforces its equally important commitment to
    promoting programs and activities designed to help individuals learn
    English. To this end, each Federal agency shall examine the services
    it provides and develop and implement a system by which LEP persons can
    meaningfully access those services consistent with, and without unduly
    burdening, the fundamental mission of the agency. Each Federal agency
    shall also work to ensure that recipients of Federal financial
    assistance (recipients) provide meaningful access to their LEP
    applicants and beneficiaries. To assist the agencies with this
    endeavor, the Department of Justice has today issued a general
    guidance document (LEP Guidance), which sets forth the compliance
    standards that recipients must follow to ensure that the programs and
    activities they normally provide in English are accessible to LEP
    persons and thus do not discriminate on the basis of national origin
    in violation of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,
    and its implementing regulations. As described in the LEP Guidance,
    recipients must take reasonable steps to ensure meaningful access to
    their programs and activities by LEP persons.

    Sec. 2. Federally Conducted Programs and Activities.
    Each Federal agency shall prepare a plan to improve access to its
    federally conducted programs and activities by eligible LEP persons.
    Each plan shall be consistent with the standards set forth in the LEP
    Guidance, and shall include the steps the agency will take to ensure
    that eligible LEP persons can meaningfully access the agency's programs
    and activities. Agencies shall develop and begin to implement these
    plans within 120 days of the date of this order, and shall send copies
    of their plans to the Department of Justice, which shall serve as the
    central repository of the agencies' plans.

    Sec. 3. Federally Assisted Programs and Activities.
    Each agency providing Federal financial assistance shall draft
    title VI guidance specifically tailored to its recipients that is
    consistent with the LEP Guidance issued by the Department of Justice.
    This agency-specific guidance shall detail how the general standards
    established in the LEP Guidance will be applied to the agency's
    recipients. The agency-specific guidance shall take into account the
    types of services provided by the recipients, the individuals
    served by the recipients, and other factors set out in the LEP Guidance.
    Agencies that already have developed title VI guidance that the
    Department of Justice determines is consistent with the LEP Guidance
    shall examine their existing guidance, as well as their programs and
    activities, to determine if additional guidance is necessary to comply
    with this order. The Department of Justice shall consult with the
    agencies in creating their guidance and, within 120 days of the date
    of this order, each agency shall submit its specific guidance to the
    Department of Justice for review and approval. Following approval by
    the Department of Justice, each agency shall publish its guidance
    document in the Federal Register for public comment.

    Sec. 4. Consultations.
    In carrying out this order, agencies shall ensure that
    stakeholders, such as LEP persons and their representative
    organizations, recipients, and other appropriate individuals or
    entities, have an adequate opportunity to provide input. Agencies will
    evaluate the particular needs of the LEP persons they and their
    recipients serve and the burdens of compliance on the agency and its
    recipients. This input from stakeholders will assist the agencies in
    developing an approach to ensuring meaningful access by LEP persons
    that is practical and effective, fiscally responsible, responsive to
    the particular circumstances of each agency, and can be readily
    implemented.

    Sec. 5. Judicial Review.
    This order is intended only to improve the internal management of
    the executive branch and does not create any right or benefit,
    substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or equity by a party
    against the United States, its agencies, its officers or employees, or
    any person.


    WILLIAM J. CLINTON

    THE WHITE HOUSE,
    August 11, 2000.

    Governments will always misuse the machinery of the law as far as the state of public opinion permits.
    - Emile Capouya
    "Distrust and caution are the parents of security."
    Benjamin Franklin

    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member gofer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    3,728
    Since all citizens are required to speak English,supposedly, then by default this is aimed at NON-citizens. It should be criminal to have ballots in any language except English (refer to above statement.)

  3. #3
    Senior Member MyAmerica's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    5,074
    Don't quote me, but read somewhere that New York prints its ballots in 13 languages.

    Hillary Clinton on Immigration
    Democratic Jr Senator (NY)

    Making English official imperils crises needing translators
    If English becomes the official language, instead of recognized as national, that means in a place like New York City you can't print ballots in any other language. That means you can't have government pay for translators in hospitals so when somebody comes in with some sort of emergency there's nobody there to help translate what their problem is for the doctors. So many of us voted that English was our national language but not the official language because of the legal consequences of that.

    Source: 2007 Dem. debate at Saint Anselm College Jun 3, 2007
    How have hospitals successfully treated unconscious patients who couldn't speak at all?
    **********
    What the costs are today, this was from 1993 and 1994.....

    http://www.hoover.org/publications/poli ... 74512.html

    ........ In the three elections between November 1993 and November 1994, the county spent more than $1.2 million to print voting materials in these foreign tongues. The Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund has called this "a particularly small price to pay." This "small price" could have paid for a year's tuition at UCLA for 308 Los Angeles residents.

    Ballot initiatives are often worded very precisely. Will translations always convey the exact English-language meaning of every initiative? .........
    ********

    "In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin.But this is predicated upon the person's becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American...There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag... We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language... and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people."

    Theodore Roosevelt
    "Distrust and caution are the parents of security."
    Benjamin Franklin

    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •