Thread: Military DREAM Is a Mirage - 10 Years Not Worth 3 Months

Center For Immigration Studies
By Mark Krikorian

Military DREAM Is a Mirage

"10 years' worth of DREAM recruits wouldn't add up to three months' worth of manpower needs for the armed forces — and even that's pushing it, frankly."

The sponsors of the DREAM Act inserted what they clearly considered boob bait for patriotic Americans — a provision that qualifying illegal aliens (came before age 16, here at least five years, have a high school diploma or GED) could convert to permanent status and get a green card if they served two years in the military (as an alternative to two years of college). As Jim Edwards mentioned here yesterday, Clifford Stanley, the Undersecretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, told reporters that DREAM is a "commonsense" and "obvious" way to increase recruitment:
http://cis.org/edwards/dream-in-uniform
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 02272.html

"They're actually doing very well in our schools, many of them. They’re high quality," Stanley told reporters in a conference call. "As we look at our force now for the future, bringing in talented people in this cyclical nature of how our recruiting business goes is significant."

This guy is obviously a political appointee parroting the administration line, because he knows perfectly well this is malarkey. The Migration Policy Institute estimated that 31,000 illegal aliens — at the absolute outside — would get their green cards via military service (see p. 15 here). And that's over maybe a ten-year period.
http://www.migrationpolicy.org/pubs/DRE ... ly2010.pdf

That's not even a drop in the bucket for recruitment. In Fiscal Year 2010, which ended September 30, the Pentagon reports it recruited about 165,000 people for active duty (I don't remember if service in the reserves counts in any of the multiple versions of the DREAM Act).
http://www.defense.gov/releases/release ... seid=13961

That's an average of about 14,000 a month, so 10 years' worth of DREAM recruits wouldn't add up to three months' worth of manpower needs for the armed forces — and even that's pushing it, frankly, since many of the DREAM beneficiaries would have GEDs, which the military generally doesn't accept.

Others would be rejected because they don't speak English; MPI reports that 12 percent of those qualified for the initial, conditional DREAM status and who already have high-school diplomas or GEDs speak English not well or not at all. (Let me repeat: one out of eight young illegal aliens who have grown up here and have a high school completion credential can't speak English.

So much for being Americans "in all but paperwork," as the DREAM advocates like to put it). What's more, those scoring in the bottom 20 percent of the spread in the military IQ test are barred by law from enlisting, while the next 20 percent are limited to a very small number.

Finally, the radical-left groups have long been outraged that the military option is even there and will be actively working in immigrant communities (where they have a significant base) to dissuade people from recruiting.

In short, the argument that Republicans need to support the DREAM Act because the Pentagon wants it is complete hogwash. Even if the military wanted to foreignize our armed forces as way of keeping labor costs down (as Max Boot has suggested), DREAM wouldn't fit the bill.
http://www.cfr.org/publication/7861/unc ... ts_tu.html

Source: http://www.cis.org/krikorian/military-dream-mirage

Map showing Mexican territory in 1917 (dark green), territory promised to Mexico in the Zimmermann telegram (light green), and original Mexican territory (red line).

The Zimmermann Telegram (or Zimmermann Note; German: Zimmermann-Depesche; Spanish: Telegrama Zimmermann) was a 1917 diplomatic proposal from the German Empire to Mexico to make war against the United States. The proposal was declined by Mexico, but angered Americans and led in part to the declaration of war in April.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zimmermann_Telegram

related

Bennett: GOP might pass own version of DREAM Act next year

http://www.alipac.us/ftopic-221014-0-da ... rasc-.html

Republicans who voted for the Dream Act

http://www.alipac.us/ftopic-220854-0-da ... rasc-.html

ALIPAC's Targeted 31 Senators Up for Reelection in 2012

http://www.alipac.us/ftopic-219596-days ... asc-0.html

The amnesty program that tried and failed
Oct 8, 2006 ... The 1986 amnesty legislation also showed that even strictly monitoring work sites and the border is doomed to failure without addressing the ...
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepubli ... intro.html

If the 1986 Amnesty was such a gross failure, why would anyone try ...
Mar 29, 2010 ... 80 % of the citizens do not want another amnesty they want these people deported immediately. in 1986 there where promises made and none of them ...
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index ... 921AAo3jMx

Reagan's Attorney General, Ed Meese, Says Amnesty Then And Now A ...
Ed Meese, the attorney general under President Ronald Reagan, supported the 1986 amnesty that was passed. Now he says things today look similar and the amnesty that he supported in 1986 was a mistake and utter failure.
We're doomed to repeat the mistakes of the past again. Meese compares the bill from '86 to the bill that is in the Senate that is expected to pass today.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/24/opini ... ref=slogin

FAIR: Chief Overseer of 1986 Amnesty Says Don't Repeat a Failed Policy
Apr 6, 2006 ... Rather than stemming the tide of illegal immigration, the 1986 amnesty and subsequent extension amnesties, coupled with a manifest failure ...

Measuring the Fallout (Cost of the 1986 amnesty after ten years)
I fault all administrations from Reagan on for this failure. ... but the 1986 amnesty was a mistake we should learn from and not repeat. ...
http://www.cis.org/articles/1997/back197.htm

The 1986 amnesty failed spectaculary, why repeat the mistake ...
Aug 30, 2005 ... Georgie Anne Geyer discusses the 1986 amnesty, that was supposed to ..... What failure? How are we suffering? The strongest nation on earth. ...
http://24ahead.com/blog/archives/003759.html

The Reagan Amnesty Vs. The Bush Amnesty - Right Wing News ...
Jun 19, 2007 ... #1) In 1986, they didn't have the complete and utter failure of the 1986 amnesty to use as a guide. In other words, the idea of an amnesty ...
http://rightwingnews.com/mt331/2007/06/ ... e_bush.php

1986 Redux: Proposed Senate Immigration Reform Repeats Past ...
May 30, 2007 ... The 1986 bill granted amnesty, then tried to enforce the law, ... -Senate-Immigration-Reform-Repeats-Past-Failure?
http://www.heritage.org/research/report ... st-failure

American Chronicle | 97% of Illegal Aliens Take Jobs That ...
Apr 7, 2006 ... On light of the utter failure of America 's last attempt at granting amnesty, IRCA of 1986, there must not be any talk of Guest Worker ...
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/7801

Get the two-page Truth Sheet. - AMNESTY HANDOUT
Impact of Amnesty: In analyzing the 2007 CIR bill, Robert Rector of The Heritage
Foundation stated, “The main fiscal impact… will occur through two mechanisms:

(1) the grant of amnesty, with accompanying access to Social Security, Medicare and
welfare benefits, to 12 million illegal immigrants who are overwhelmingly low skilled;
and

(2) a dramatic increase in chain immigration, which will also be predominantly low
skilled.â€