Thread: Suit seeks to limit shackling of immigration detainees in

Suit seeks to limit shackling of immigration detainees in court

August 17, 2011 | 1:43pm

Civil rights attorneys in San Francisco have sued federal authorities, demanding an end to the alleged practice of shackling all adult detainees -- even the elderly and disabled -- during immigration court proceedings.

The class-action lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights, contends that Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Department of Homeland Security are violating the constitutional rights of detainees by failing to make case-by-case determinations of the need for shackling.

“Physical restraints are meant for those who pose significant risk to themselves or others,â€

Heck make em wear pink underwear and anything else that make them a public scene. Take pictures and films of them and flood the news and internet and let illegals coast to coast know that they will be arrested and deported.

ACLU sues US for shackling immigrant detainees

Aug. 17, 2011, 6:24 p.m. PDT
Associated Press

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — The American Civil Liberties Union and other groups have filed a lawsuit in San Francisco federal court seeking to stop a practice in which alleged illegal immigrants are shackled at the feet, waist and wrists while appearing in immigration court.

The groups allege in the suit filed Monday that a blanket policy that allows the immigrants to remain chained for up to 12 hours on the day they are due in court violates constitutional bans against cruel and unusual punishment.

According to the lawsuit, the overwhelming majority of prisoners who show up in immigration courts have no violent criminal history. The lawsuit seeks to compel the Department of Homeland Security to make individual determinations about shackling rather than have a blanket policy. DHS officials declined to comment Wednesday.

The lawsuit applies only to immigrants appearing in San Francisco immigration courts. But attorneys who filed the lawsuit said Wednesday that they hope it prompts changes to the system in other cities.

"We'd like to convince them to follow their own policy and at least add some humanity to it and recognize it's a painful and hurtful thing to shackle people like that," said Paul Chavez, senior attorney for the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights in San Francisco, one of the groups that filed the lawsuit.

The groups allege that shackling everyone at an immigration hearing amounts to cruel and unusual punishment. The lawsuit seeks class action status to represent prisoners transported to and appearing in immigration court in shackles in San Francisco.

"We want them to be able to say, 'No, we want this person shackled because they have a criminal history,' instead of shackling your nanny who happens to get swept up in a raid somewhere," Chavez said.

The lawsuit also alleges that prisoners suffer "physical pain and discomfort, embarrassment and humiliation, mental and emotional stress and a sense the detainee is being misjudged to be an exceptionally dangerous person."

Chavez said that at one hearing, a defendant couldn't wipe away his tears because of his shackles, and was crying from embarrassment because his 8- and 10-year-old sons were in the courtroom.

Chavez said the practice also violates attorney-client privacy because immigrants are shackled together.

It's unclear how common the shackling of immigrants at immigration hearings is nationwide. The lawsuit says the practice isn't rampant across America but does happen outside of San Francisco.

In Arizona, shackling immigrants in civil proceedings happens "rarely," said Alessandra Soler Meetze, executive director of the ACLU of Arizona.

But that's not the case for immigrants in Arizona processed through a program called "Operation Streamline," a fast-track program that speeds illegal immigrants caught crossing the desert through accelerated legal proceedings.

At one such hearing in May, 70 suspected illegal immigrants crowded a courtroom, their ankle and wrist shackles clanging. A federal judge called up groups of five to read them their rights and accept their guilty pleas to misdemeanor illegal entry. Most were sentenced to time served and likely would be taken to Mexico for deportation the same day.

__

Myers reported from Phoenix
http://www.oregonlive.com/newsflash/ind ... 1bda69b871