No, not create it. Gather information about a paradigm shift already occuring. And through the clutter, even people who speak out against it, I gather intelligence. That intelligence is worth money.
For instance you have just admitted that you do not care about why. You will not verify hard fact and solid history because it agrees with somebody (me) whom you disagree with. Well... very well. But that is good information. See? I cannot go into a forum like this hoping for one outcome or another. That is not scientific.
I think it may have been Mr. Gheen who eloquently summed up what I was portraying as foreign claims on American soil. There are many other sources of information, primarily the federal repository down the street. But this works well to supplement a profile. I should be careful not to offend you enough to get you expelled from the forum. But that is just because I have seen that happen too many times.
There will be no presumption on my part that you speak for a vast majority of readers here. I know there are many who would like this to be a ventilator ground to release inert gas about illegal immigration. And I have confirmed before you that at least one Reader comprehends my Posts properly in gist.
Of course you do not like the state of affairs; especially with the feds doing nothing but standing ready to quash a Minuteman vigilante group if necessary. (Necessary being the moment they actually harm a Mexican national.)
About globalism. Well that would not be very scientific of me either now would it? To come in here spouting globalism. I will tell you this - the gold fringe is the flag. It means the same thing in any debtor nation of the world. The Secretary, endowed with Presidential banking powers is the US Governor for the IMF. Meaning an officer appointed to manage the national debt of the US. The IMF is an organ of the United Nations.
I don't think you will find Kofi Annan approving of arresting a man for simply being Mexican. He probably would say something like, "Do unto others what you wish they would do unto you."
So we will see. I have linked David Brooks here and maybe he is reading. I doubt being a journalist he is allowed to write freely in chats but hopefully he will let us know about any subsequent articles and developments.
Regards,
David Merrill.