Results 1 to 8 of 8
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
05-01-2010, 04:20 PM #1
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
- Posts
- 117,696
Boycott Arizona? No! It’s Time For A Massive Show Of Suppo
Americans, take our business and vacations to Arizona and shun places with warped thinking like San Francisco
Boycott Arizona? No! It’s Time For A Massive Show Of Support
By Jim Campbell
Saturday, May 1, 2010
Once again, the progressives on the left are shooting off their mouths while failing to read the law.
Arizona’s new legislation designed to protect their boarders is Constitutionally affirming Federal Law. The new legislation apparently gets in the way of hysteric race baiters, those that want to file law suits, boycott Arizona and declare the new immigration law signed recently by Governor Brewer Unconstitutional without reading it.
It’s time that we go on the offense as Americans and take our business and vacations to Arizona and shun places with warped thinking like San Francisco.
Arizona has a right to defend its borders and the influx of illegal aliens because the Federal Government will not uphold it’s own law. See: Title 8 Section 1325 of the U.S. Code, “Improper Entry by Alien,â€Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
05-01-2010, 04:42 PM #2
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
- TEXAS - The Lone Star State
- Posts
- 16,941
Keep an eye on the sticky in the "general" category that shows the people who oppose SB 1070. this will be your list of who to boycott
-
05-01-2010, 04:47 PM #3
Well Helllooooo illegal immigration! I would like to introduce you to a friend, meet my amigo and say howdy-do to state's rights! Yee-haw!
Thank You Arizona!
Seems as though the MSM and the marxists wish to ignore the fact that Arizona has broke the silence! States have rights too! Yee-haw!
The controlling Supreme Court precedent is 1976’s De Canas v. Bica. In that case, the Supreme Court recognized states may enact legislation to discourage illegal immigration within their jurisdictions. The mere fact that a state law concerns illegal immigration or affects immigration in some way does not render it pre-empted.
Concurrent Enforcement: The principle that protects the Arizona law is the legal principle of concurrent enforcement. This has been recognized by several courts, including the 9th Circuit. It holds that a law is not conflict-preempted if the state law prohibits the same behavior that is already prohibited by federal law. Similarly, if a state officer acts in a way to assist the federal government in that action, he concurrently enforces what is already prohibited under federal law.
That principle guides any interpretation of S.B. 1070.
Hey commies, stick that in your pipe and smoke it!
-
05-01-2010, 04:57 PM #4Concurrent Enforcement: The principle that protects the Arizona law is the legal principle of concurrent enforcement. This has been recognized by several courts, including the 9th Circuit. http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNL ... hbxlogin=1 It holds that a law is not conflict-preempted if the state law prohibits the same behavior that is already prohibited by federal law. Similarly, if a state officer acts in a way to assist the federal government in that action, he concurrently enforces what is already prohibited under federal law.
Where are the massive crowds of illegal alien lovers? Oops, guess they're believing their own (and the leftist loonies in msm) press and didn't get the message that alot more people SUPPORT AZ than are against it. Remember we shut down amnesty, DREAM, etc? Still against it.
[quote]Arizona has a right to defend its borders and the influx of illegal aliens because the Federal Government will not uphold it’s own law. See: Title 8 Section 1325 of the U.S. Code, “Improper Entry by Alien,â€Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
"
-
05-01-2010, 04:58 PM #5
Racial Profiling
Using the Racial Profiling excuse is just a ploy. Nothing more than RACE BAITING...
Sorry Marxist/communistos. That ploy has been played out by your commie leaders along with political correctness for far too long. We are sick of it. Call it whatever lame accusatory name you want. We know who you are and why you are here. We know all your little ploys and your agenda completely now...Denied
-
05-01-2010, 06:05 PM #6
miguelina wrote,
That's where their race-baiting, hate-filled hysteria comes from, they don't want the federal law enforced.
Now a state has come forward and broken the tradition of waiting in vain for the feds to show up and do their job. The real threat to illegal immigration and the yahoos who wish to profit from illegal immigration in the many and various ways are now looking down the barrel of a state's gun aimed at taking their responsibility to their citizens seriously. There is one federal government, there are many surrounding states. We surround them. As more and more people (citizens) learn about state's rights,.....well then not only is their goose cooked, but the cat will be out of the bag! JMHO
-
05-01-2010, 06:11 PM #7
I booked a great getaway to the Grand Canyon in Rocktober.
We have always went to the Sierra's for fun.
My son, a Navy Seal will be a part of this fun.
You DO NOT want to hear view on the AZ law.
More expletives than words for OBummer.You cannot dedicate yourself to America unless you become in every
respect and with every purpose of your will thoroughly Americans. You
cannot become thoroughly Americans if you think of yourselves in groups. President Woodrow Wilson
-
05-01-2010, 10:06 PM #8
In 2006 when they had the big walk-out protest,thinking the country would fold because we Americans could not possibly run our country without them.HAHAHAHA. We have been boycotting them since that insult to AMERICANS.
Durbin pushes voting rights for illegal aliens without public...
04-25-2024, 09:10 PM in Non-Citizen & illegal migrant voters