Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member SOSADFORUS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    IDAHO
    Posts
    19,570

    Court hears suit on Mexican trucks in U.S.

    Court hears suit on Mexican trucks in U.S.
    By PAUL ELIAS
    Associated Press
    Article Last Updated: 02/13/2008 02:13:42 AM PST



    SAN FRANCISCO
    — A federal appeals court considered Tuesday whether the Bush administration can go ahead with a pilot program that allows a small number of Mexican trucks to travel freely on U.S. highways, despite a new law by Congress against it.
    Members of the Teamsters Union and their supporters packed a courtroom at 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, where an apparently divided three-judge panel heard arguments in the case, which may boil down to the meaning of "establish."

    Several tractor trailers also were parked outside the courthouse and union members and their supporters carried signs opposing the program, which allows participating Mexican trucking companies to send loads throughout the United States.

    The Teamsters, Sierra Club and Public Citizen sued the administration in August to try to stop the program, which the U.S. agreed to as part of the 1994 North American Free Trade Agreement.

    In December, Congress passed legislation banning funding to "establish" a program that allows U.S.-certified Mexican trucks to carry loads across the border and into the country. But the Department of Transportation interpreted "establish" as meaning to start a new program rather than to stop the current one, which was launched in September.

    "The congressional intent is unambiguous," said Judge Dorothy Nelson, one of three appellate judges who will decide the issue. "The intention was to halt the pilot program."

    But colleague Judge Andrew Kleinfled seemed
    satisfied by the administration's position that the new law only prevents new programs and doesn't address the current one. The issue may hinge on the vote of Judge Michael Daly Hawkins, who didn't tip his hand during the hearing.
    American inspectors are required to certify the Mexican trucks and drivers for safety before they enter the country and the vehicles will be inspected at the border before they are let into the United States.

    Some 42 Mexican trucks owned by 12 carriers have entered the United States since the Bush administration launched the hotly contested program, which permits up to 500 trucks from 100 Mexican companies full access to U.S. roads.

    The Teamsters and environmentalists argue that the cross-border program will erode highway safety and eliminate U.S. jobs. They also say there are insufficient safeguards to ensure Mexican trucks are as safe as U.S. carriers.

    A lawyer for the Sierra Club said not enough Mexican carriers have qualified to enter the United States to provide the necessary data to show the pilot program is safe. He said the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration had planned to have about 100 carriers certified by now, but only a dozen Mexican companies have been cleared.


    "The agency never considered there would be so few carriers," Sierra Club lawyer Jonathan Weissglass said. "It means the pilot program is a sham."

    Department of Justice attorney Irene Solet said the program requires border agents to ensure all Mexican truck drivers who intend to drive more than 25 miles into the U.S. have valid Mexican commercial drivers licenses.

    She further argued that if Congress intended to "turn its back on the NAFTA agreement" with the law it passed barring establishment of cross-border trucking programs "much more clarity from Congress would be expected."

    Supporters of the plan say letting more Mexican trucks on U.S. highways will save American consumers hundreds of millions of dollars. And they say U.S. trucking companies will benefit since reciprocal changes in Mexico's rules permit U.S. trucks new access to that country.

    The "program gives U.S. truck drivers opportunities to compete and succeed in a market they've never before been allowed to enter while ensuring the safety of our highways," Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration chief John Hill said in statement after the hearing.
    http://www.montereyherald.com/ci_8248074
    Please support ALIPAC's fight to save American Jobs & Lives from illegal immigration by joining our free Activists E-Mail Alerts (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member roundabout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,445
    Mr. John Hill, I contend that you sir are a crackpot! Most American drivers have no desires whatsoever to go to Mexico! Most American carriers will not cross that border for no amount of money. American truckers already know what happens when their trailer is taken across the borders by Mexican drivers to be unloaded and then returned. It comes back with not so new tires, (tires are exchanged in Mexico, it became necessary to brand tires and note this on the paperwork to insure the original tires were left on the truck) turn signal lenses and anything else that was not welded to the trailers were removed! Some trailers never even were returned! One company found their trailers set up in the desert with the refer units running(Refrigerated units) complete with front porches and curtains! Mobile home with air-conditioning courtesy of American trucking companies!

    What American driver in his right mind would cross that border? There are none in their right mind! Could you imagine taking a loaded trailer with contents worth $100,000.00 into Mexico?

  3. #3
    Senior Member agrneydgrl's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,760
    "She further argued that if Congress intended to "turn its back on the NAFTA agreement" with the law it passed barring establishment of cross-border trucking programs "much more clarity from Congress would be expected."

    How much clearer can congress be? They said no funding for the truck project. Also, our infrastructure is already deteriorating and with many more heavy trucks on our roads, make it worse, not to mention more traffic congestion.

  4. #4
    Senior Member SOSADFORUS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    IDAHO
    Posts
    19,570
    Senator Dorgan aready "Clarified " it for them in a letter, but they don't like his "Clairification".....Of course what does he know he only voted on the bill
    Please support ALIPAC's fight to save American Jobs & Lives from illegal immigration by joining our free Activists E-Mail Alerts (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •