Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member Dixie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Texas - Occupied State - The Front Line
    Posts
    35,072

    Dancing with Those Who've Brought You

    http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/opinion/14714587.htm

    Dancing with those who've brought you
    By Cal Thomas
    Tribune Media Services

    The war now being waged in Congress over illegal immigration is mostly about which philosophy will prevail in the Republican Party.

    Will it be the conservative wing that brought the GOP to power after years of wandering in the political wilderness, or will it be the moderate-liberal wing that became comfortable in the wild?

    It is no secret that the Rockefeller wing of the Republican Party has joined forces with liberal Democrats and even "conservative" Republicans to weaken the GOP's conservative wing.

    The New York Times' Jim Rutenberg wrote an "analysis" about the titanic struggle between the party's two wings on that newspaper's front page Friday. In it, Rutenberg ponders, "... what strain of conservatism the Republican Party carries into the midterm elections and beyond. Will it be the compassionate brand Mr. Bush considers crucial to the party's future, in this case by signaling support for a provision in the Senate bill that would give most illegal immigrants an opportunity to become legal? Or will it be the more doctrinaire variety embraced by much of Mr. Bush's party in the House, one that shuns anything that smacks of amnesty for illegal immigrants and seeks to criminalize them further?"

    In the Rutenberg moderate-liberal view, people whose politics are founded on strong beliefs, rather than feelings, are "doctrinaire."

    To moderate liberals, positions born of convictions qualify an individual for one or more of the following monikers: racist, sexist, homophobic, ultra, intolerant, judgmental, unforgiving, fanatical, extreme or arch.

    A liberal who holds the opposite positions receives no such labels and much praise in the mainstream media and political culture.

    Too bad Ken Lay's jury was so "doctrinaire" about the law.

    Too many Republicans seem to care more about the future of their party than the future of the country.

    In the case of illegal immigrants, moderate-liberal Republicans want to "absolve" illegals, hoping for electoral contributions to their party.

    It won't work, because even if all illegals end up becoming legal and voting for Republicans, the conservative disgust and abandonment of the GOP would outweigh any short-term gains the party might enjoy.

    The bill passed last Thursday by the Senate genuflects toward tougher enforcement of the border and penalties on employers who knowingly hire illegals, but it is like the sinner who gets absolution without real repentance.

    Rep. Charlie Norwood, R-Ga., sees through the sham. In a press release, Norwood calls the Senate bill an "amnesty bill" designed to give "preferential treatment" to illegals over U.S. citizens. "This bill constitutes treachery against U.S. sovereignty," said Norwood, (and) "allows every illegal alien in America to use the fraudulent document industry they have created in the criminal back alleys of our country to claim they have been here five years and can now stay forever. They have granted blanket amnesty for citizens of foreign nations against tax fraud, Social Security fraud, Medicare fraud, identity fraud, and bank fraud -- all crimes for which there is no forgiveness or mercy for citizens of the United States."

    By Rutenberg's standard, Norwood would be placed in the "intolerant" wing of the GOP. The congressman says, "The physical results of this bill, while terrible, do not equal the moral devastation this sell-out would produce. There is one overpowering message in this bill: that the law no longer deserves respect in America."

    The outcome of "immigration reform" will determine where the party and country are headed.

    If Republicans lurch to the left, they'll head for the cliff. The left did not bring them to power; the right did. If they have forgotten that, they deserve the cliff. The right should give them a push.


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Cal Thomas writes for Tribune Media Services. Cal@CalThomas.com
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,569
    If Republicans lurch to the left, they'll head for the cliff. The left did not bring them to power; the right did. If they have forgotten that, they deserve the cliff. The right should give them a push.
    Enough said!

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    1,207
    Well said!!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •