Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. 10-25-2007, 01:19 PM #1
    dyehard39
    dyehard39 is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    reno, nev
    Posts
    1,902

    SCHIP TODAY SAME AS SCHIP OF YESTERDAY

    [[color=darkblue]b]SCHIP TODAY SAME AS SCHIP OF YESTERDAY ONLY BIGGER.

    Nancy is speaking and I do not see what has changes except 300% of poverty level will not quality.
    When she say[b] “our childrenâ€
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 10-25-2007, 02:24 PM #2
    iQuestionEverything
    iQuestionEverything is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    UT ..just ONE illegal is too many, let’s start w/the usurper & his cronies..!! ;)
    Posts
    3,161

    Cspan2 NOW! Schip vote in House 12.15p MST

    Cspan2 NOW! Schip vote in House 12.15p MST

    The dems are intentionally abusing the fire distraction and voting on Schip! Repubs had only a 300 page manuscript to read from this morning..!

    http://www.c-span.org/watch/cs_cspan_rm ... TV&Code=CS

    Call the dems offices to vote NO!
    No need for ‘mass roundups’, simply ENFORCE EXISTING law*& MANDATE the worker ID, ..but SEVEN amnesties? Hmm, WHO cried wolf?!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 10-25-2007, 05:40 PM #3
    dyehard39
    dyehard39 is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    reno, nev
    Posts
    1,902
    I keep hearing illegal aliens will not be covered, but anchor babies will be and if pregnant women are covered, that will cover a lot of illegal aliens giving birth to anchor babies.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules