Federal judges: JUDICIAL "OUTLAWS"

Is "illegal immigration" and aiding and abetting "illegal aliens" a crime or not?
by an American Patriot
March 30, 2005

On March 8, 2005, Jerry Seper reported in The Washington Times that the Supreme and 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco "backs immigrants in job lawsuit" after the district court magistrate refused to allow the defendant from questioning the 'immigration status' of the plaintiffs under their Title VII claim for "unlawful" discrimination.

Appellate Judge Stephen Reinhardt, whose wife Ramona Ripston is president of the Los Angeles chapter of the ACLU. wrote his "opinion" in the case saying "Granting employers the right to inquire into workers' immigration status in cases like this would allow them to raise implicitly the threat of deportation and criminal prosecution every time a worker, documented or undocumented, reports illegal practices or files a Title VII action."

The Constitution for the United States established the judicial power of the federal courts that "shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States ... between citizens of the same state ... " and whether the plaintiffs are 'citizens' of the United States entitled to the 'privilege' of suing in the courts of the United States determines the jurisdiction of the court to hear the case. Article VI explicitly provides that "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof ... shall be the supreme law of the Land...and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution." The Judiciary is restricted to the confines of the Constitution and not "opinion' or personal agenda.

Federal judges are 'unconstitutionally' amending provisions of the Constitution conferring unlawful jurisdiction upon itself and and granting 'privileges' of citizenship upon "illegal aliens" and "foreign nationals" without the consent ir ratification of the States. Federal judges are operating "outside of the law" -- Congress does nothing.

"Aliens" -- "documented or undocumented" -- are not "persons" under the Constitution entitled to the privilege of suing in the courts of the United States and "their acts of pretended legislation " is unconstitutional. "Aliens" are 'ficticious plaintiffs' not permitted in federal cases under 'Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,' only a citizen can sue as per Article III of the Constitution and the courts holding that "There being no fictitious party practice in the courts of the United States, it is hereby ORDERED that the action be DISMISSED as to all fictitious parties. Dismissal is without prejudice to the right of any party to take advantage of the provisions of Rule 15(c), Fed.R.Civ.P" -- as a 'matter of law' 'fictitious parties' never existed in the first place.

Title VII bars discrimination based on national origin and protects all United States citizens whether the citizens be African-Americans, Asian-Americans, Mexican-Americans, Italian-Americans, Native-Americans, Irish-Americans, Arab-Americans, Russian-Americans, etc. Title VII protects 'national origin" and not "foreign nationals" -- regardless of whether they are legal or 'illegal' immigrants.

Federal agents raided Wal-Mart stores across the country and arrested illegal workers in 21 states. In a settlement to the United States for knowingly hiring illegal aliens, Wal-Mart paid an $11 million and 12 of it's contractors agreed to pay $4 million and pled guilty to criminal immigration charges.

Executives and managers of Tyson Foods Inc. were indicted with a 36-counts for conspiracy to smuggle illegal aliens to its U.S. facilities for profit. Tyson Foods aided and abetted illegal aliens by obtaining false documents so they could work at processing plants "under the false pretense of being legally employable."

It is unlawful to hire any individual for employment in the United States without complying with employment eligibility verification requirements and any person will be subject to prosecution, criminal fines, and imprisonment under the laws of the United States for transporting, hiring and harboring "illegal aliens." 8 USC Sec 1324 provides that "Any person who . . . encourages or induces an illegal alien to . . . reside . . . knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such . . . residence is . . . in violation of law, shall be punished as provided . . . for each illegal alien in respect to whom such a violation occurs . . . fined under title 18 . . . imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both." Judge Stephen Reinhardt, the judges of the Supreme Court and district court are in violation of the Constitution and their judicial oath to " "preserve, protect and defend ... the Constitution of the United States" as well as 8 USC Sec 1324 because "Any person" does not exclude federal judges. Conspiracy to commit the "criminal acts" is a separate federal offense under 18 USC Sec 371.