Thread: EU backs French Immigration Pact

EU backs French immigration pact


EU ministers have agreed in principle to a French plan aimed at reforming immigration rules across the union.

At informal talks in Cannes, ministers from all 27 states signed a draft pact agreeing common rules on the treatment of migrants and asylum requests.

French diplomats hope to get the new rules adopted officially in October.

The ministers agreed to the plans after France dropped a controversial clause calling for migrants to be obliged to learn the host language and culture.

But the pact keeps a pledge to avoid mass amnesties for illegal migrants.

"The interior ministers gave their unanimous accord on the principles, the objectives, the presentation and the structure of the pact," said French Immigration Minister Brice Hortefeux.

He said he hoped the pact would be approved at a summit of EU leaders in mid-October.

France, which began its six-month term as chair of the EU presidency on 1 July, has voiced opposition to mass "regularisations" of illegal migrants, such as Spain's mass amnesty for about 700,000 illegal migrants in 2005.

But Spain's Interior Minister Alfredo Perez Rubalcaba said he was "satisfied" with the French draft pact, adding: "I think it's very important for us to have a common immigration policy."

There are an estimated eight million illegal migrants in the EU.

Migration challenges

The pact aims to make it easier for legal migrants to fill job vacancies in Europe and integrate. With its ageing population, Europe has a continuing need for migrant labour in many sectors.

The French news agency AFP says the pact allows for migrant "regularisations" on a case-by-case basis, in accordance with national laws.

It also calls for repatriation agreements with countries where necessary and for the European Commission to draft an EU plan for common EU-wide asylum procedures to be in place in 2012, AFP reports.

"We're talking about targeted and coordinated immigration - in other words, which takes account of countries' needs and their ability to host migrants, based on dialogue with the countries of origin," Mr Hortefeux said.

Spain and Malta have been struggling to cope with boatloads of African would-be immigrants in recent years.

Meanwhile, the European Commission and human rights groups have expressed concern about the Italian government's plan to fingerprint tens of thousands of Roma (Gypsies) living in makeshift camps across Italy.

Controversial directive

The EU has already adopted new rules for detaining and expelling illegal immigrants. The "returns directive", due to take effect in 2010, allows states to hold illegal immigrants for six months, extendable by another 12 months in certain cases.

Earlier this month South American heads of state jointly condemned the returns directive. Hundreds of thousands of Latin Americans live and work in Europe, many of them illegally.

In 2005, Spain said illegal immigrants could claim work and residency papers if they could present a six-month work contract and evidence that they had lived in the country since August 2004.

Ecuadoreans were the largest group to apply under the amnesty, followed by Romanians and Moroccans.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7493902.stm

There are an estimated eight million illegal migrants in the EU.

All this fuss over a measley 8 million illegals in the whole European Union combined? What are these people thinking??? We've got nearly 4 times that many and our government apparently thinks it's no big deal...

Let's see if they want half our illegals.

We should be cheering that they are taking action--perhaps they can help us next.

As per usual, South America thinks all of the hub-ub is about them. Their illegals only make up a minority percentage of illegals in the EU. Muslims make up the majority, and that's for whom the new legislation is aimed.

European states have had a difficult time tackling the issue because Muslims do not, as a group, condone cultural assimilation. Their religion and culture are so closely intertwined that they consider any infringement on their culture to be an infringement on their religious freedom. To agitate matters, they are quite adept at using litigation to preserve their religious freedom (ie their culture, lifestyle, language, etc.).

For those that think we have a big illegal immigration problem, they might want to consider how much better we have it than the EU.

For those that think we have a big illegal immigration problem, they might want to consider how much better we have it than the EU.

???
You mean on the surface, right?
Every single point you made about the EU muslim community is also at play here in the U.S. As a matter of fact, we are in the greater danger because of our liberal lawmakers and judges being leveraged on behalf of "civil liberties" and in the name of "democracy". Don't make the mistake of believing it's better here because it's not as noisy on that frontier.