Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    65,443

    Denver mandates verification of immigration status for const

    Denver mandates verification of immigration status for construction contracts

    By John Ingold
    The Denver Post

    Posted: 08/09/2010 08:52:15 PM MDT
    Updated: 08/09/2010 08:58:10 PM MDT


    The Denver City Council gave final approval Monday night to a measure requiring construction contractors vying for city work to verify the immigration status of their employees.

    The ordinance, which passed by a 9-4 vote, makes construction firms use the federal E-Verify program to validate new employees' immigration status as a condition of holding a city contract. The firms must also vouch for their existing employee's immigration status before being awarded the contract.

    "This is saying, 'We're doing our best as a city to make sure our contractors ... are using workers who are qualified to work under the laws of the land," said Councilwoman Jeanne Faatz, who co-sponsored the ordinance.

    The new rule will go into effect Oct. 1. The city already requires the same check for companies hoping to win a service contract.

    E-Verify is an online database that checks information on an employee's I-9 form — on which identifying information like Social Security documentation is registered — against data from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and the Social Security Administration. It is one of two databases prospective state contractors can use in complying with state immigration status-verification rules.

    "No citizen or legal resident should have to compete with workers who are here illegally," said Councilman Charlie Brown.

    But critics of the new ordinance said E-Verify is too error-prone for comfort and could cause legal workers to be punished if they are mistakenly listed as illegal.

    "I still have grave concerns over the integrity of the E-Verify program," said Councilwoman Paula Sandoval, who voted against the bill.

    Councilman Doug Linkhart said he is worried about a section that will require the city to report companies not in compliance with the ordinance to federal officials. He said that will put the city in uncharted territory.

    "I think that's a bad place to put the city in," said Linkhart, who also voted against the proposal.

    Council members Paul Lopez and Judy Montero also voted no.

    Councilwoman Carol Boigon added an amendment to the ordinance Monday to ensure an appeals process for employees who say they are wrongly disqualified and to require a review of the new system in a year.

    "The E-Verify program," Boigon cautioned in pushing the amendment, "is not infallible."

    http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_15724781
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member TexasBorn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Getyourassoutahere, Texas
    Posts
    3,783
    "But critics of the new ordinance said E-Verify is too error-prone for comfort and could cause legal workers to be punished if they are mistakenly listed as illegal."

    No common sense in this statement whatsoever. This is just code language that they are amnesty advocates. Fair minded people need to be looking at the intent and the desired overall effect. In the end, legal citizens would receive the benefit of E-Verify
    ...I call on you in the name of Liberty, of patriotism & everything dear to the American character, to come to our aid...

    William Barret Travis
    Letter From The Alamo Feb 24, 1836

  3. #3
    Senior Member Ratbstard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    New Alien City-(formerly New York City)
    Posts
    12,611
    The firms must also vouch for their existing employee's immigration status before being awarded the contract.
    THAT'S HUGE! Without that provision a contractor could just send it's known IAs to other sites and still win the contract for the government job.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  4. #4
    Senior Member HAPPY2BME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    17,895

    Re: Denver mandates verification of immigration status for c

    Quote Originally Posted by jean
    [b]"This is saying, 'We're doing our best as a city to make sure our contractors ... are using workers who are qualified to work under the laws of the land," said Councilwoman Jeanne Faatz, who co-sponsored the ordinance.

    http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_15724781
    =============================================

    SHOCKING! Doesn't the Denver City Council realize they now open themselves up to full frontal attacks from Obama, Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano, LuLaC, LaRaza, and a whole myriad of other communists and socialist?

    VIVA LA MIGRA!
    Join our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & to secure US borders by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Mexifornia
    Posts
    9,455
    "I still have grave concerns over the integrity of the E-Verify program," said Councilwoman Paula Sandoval, who voted against the bill.
    Of course you do...I have concerns that millions of illegal invaders will steal identifications as well as jobs from American citizens. I'm willing to endure the small margin of error involved with the use of E-Verify.

    So called leaders like paula sandoval use the "integrity" excuse as a reason not to support efforts to deny illegal invaders jobs. I would also bet the paula sandoval was against SB1070, as well as efforts to secure our border.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •