Results 1 to 4 of 4
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
06-11-2006, 01:47 AM #1
Immigration, customs officers bemoan lack of armor
http://www.washtimes.com/national/20060 ... -6471r.htm
Immigration, customs officers bemoan lack of armor
By Shaun Waterman
UNITED PRESS INTERNATIONAL
Published June 9, 2006
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thousands of immigration and customs officers at the nation's air and sea ports do not have body armor, or are using defective or outdated sets, placing their lives at risk, said an official complaint to the federal labor safety watchdog.
The complaint to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration of the U.S. Department of Labor says the Department of Homeland Security "is exposing employees" to risk of serious injury by failing to provide or replace body armor.
Charles Showalter, president of the National Homeland Security Council of the American Federation of Government Employees, the labor union that filed the complaint, said federal regulations and departmental policy require that any officer issued a firearm also should be issued body armor.
He said the problem appeared to be most prevalent among Customs and Border Protection (CBP) employees working at ports of entry as inspectors.
"This is ... doing homeland security on the cheap," he said, "and the guys on the front lines are being forgotten and put in danger."
The National Homeland Security Council represents about 16,000 employees in three elements of the department: CBP, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS).
The complaint says the union has tried several times to raise the issue with management, but had received "no appropriate response."
Officials from ICE and CBP said they had not seen the complaint and could not comment on it directly.
ICE spokeswoman Jamie Zuieback said agents were issued body armor upon graduation from the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center, and that agency regulations prohibited uniformed personnel from taking part in law-enforcement actions unless they were wearing it.
Lynn Hollinger, a spokeswoman for CBP, said the agency was "working to ensure that all officers have effective body armor."
But e-mails from union members across the country that Mr. Showalter provided to UPI show that in several places employees had been measured for armor, sometimes more than once, but not issued it.
"We were required to turn in our [old] body armor because it was supposed to be 'deficient,' " one wrote. "I have not yet received replacement armor and go on duty everyday on the northern border with no body armor."
In 2003, armor made by Central Lake, Mich.-based Second Chance Body Armor Inc. had to be recalled after it was found that the artificial fiber from which it was made was degrading much faster than expected.
Miss Zuieback said ICE operated a national tracking system, through which officers could order replacement armor in advance of a forthcoming expiration date.
Neither Mr. Showalter nor the agencies was able to offer exact figures on the extent of the problem, but UPI was shown e-mails from dozens of officers complaining about delays or nonissuance.Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn
-
06-11-2006, 05:41 AM #2
It's really a sad day in America, when mothers and fathers of soldiers are sending their children in Iraq body armor. Now we hear that the Border Patrol is ill equiped.
Now I know, I'm really on an episode of Sourthpartk.
DixieJoin our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
06-11-2006, 06:54 AM #3ICE spokeswoman Jamie Zuieback said ... that agency regulations prohibited uniformed personnel from taking part in law-enforcement actions unless they were wearing it. ...
... employees had been measured for armor, sometimes more than once, but not issued it. ...
"We were required to turn in our [old] body armor because it was supposed to be 'deficient,' " one wrote. "I have not yet received replacement armor and go on duty everyday on the northern border with no body armor."
In 2003, armor ... had to be recalled after it was found that the artificial fiber from which it was made was degrading much faster than expected.
The National Guard is being sent to the border with basically personal protection weapons but nothing more.
Sounds to me as if the People are being stonewalled yet again.
I think the People should form their own corporation headquartered in Washington D.C. The corportion would specialize in catering tea parties of course."Liberty CANNOT be preserved without general knowledge among people" John Adams (August 1765)
-
06-11-2006, 07:36 AM #4
This isn't right nor fair to those who are supposed to protect us.
I took care of the last police officer in Coral Gables who was shot pre-vests, years back. No officer on any force, should have to go through that.TIME'S UP!
**********
Why should <u>only</u> AMERICAN CITIZENS and LEGAL immigrants, have to obey the law?!
Arizona GOP pushing tough, new border policies, but faces strong...
05-05-2024, 10:24 AM in illegal immigration News Stories & Reports