Thread: Mixing it up with Lou Dobbs over -isms

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/o...21navarre.html
UNION-TRIBUNE
June 21, 2006

Lou Dobbs was spoiling for a fight. I know, because he wanted to fight with me.

It's not every day that I'm face to face with the person that many Americans trust on the immigration issue. According to a recent poll published in The Washington Post, 37 percent of Americans trust Dobbs on immigration while 31 percent trust President Bush. The rest were undecided.

The 37 percent in Dobbs' corner probably don't include many of the Hispanic journalists who came together last week in Fort Lauderdale for the 24th annual conference of the National Association of Hispanic Journalists. As the nation's largest gathering of print and broadcast journalists, the conference drew more than 1,200 people. That's not a bad showing considering that there are so few Hispanics in the business.

According to a survey released in April by the American Society of Newspaper Editors, there were, in 2005, just 2,474 Hispanics working in the nation's newsrooms. That's 4.51 percent of the total work force.

For his part, Dobbs has carved out a niche as a critic of illegal immigration. And so the leaders of NAHJ invited him to be part of a panel discussion on the issue that included New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson and former Mexican foreign minister Jorge Castañeda.

It was a controversial decision. Judging from the dozen or so conversations I had with conference participants, there is a concern that “people like Lou Dobbs” have seized on the issue of illegal immigration and used it to grow their fame and fortune.

Either way, Dobbs'ratings are up since he started talking incessantly about “broken borders.” His show on CNN now averages 813,000 viewers. That puts him just behind the No. 1 show in its time period: Fox News' “Special Report with Brit Hume,” which has 1.2 million viewers.

I have no problem with fame and fortune. What concerns me is the path one takes to get there.

Before the discussion, I approached Dobbs, introduced myself and thanked him for having me on his show several times in the last couple of years.

“Yes,” he said, “I read your column and I like it – except the ones that call me a racist and a xenophobe.”

It went downhill from there.

“Actually, Lou,” I said, “What I've written is that you pander to racists and xenophobes. You seem like a pretty good guy, but some of your viewers are certifiable.”

“You really think so?” he asked, “I think I have one of the most intelligent audiences on television.”

“Well,” I said, “Racism and intelligence aren't qualities that are mutually exclusive.”

He had this look on his face that suggested he was trying to process what I had just said, until an NAHJ official interceded and said it was time for Dobbs to get ready to go onstage.

“Come back on the show,” he said.

Sure. But I enjoyed this format. No sound bites or commercials. Just two guys getting in each other's face.

The panel went pretty well for Dobbs. He got applause for his jabs at employers who exploit illegal immigrant labor and the Mexican elite who are indifferent to the plight of their countrymen. He also made clear that he opposed making illegal immigrants criminals, let alone rounding them up and deporting them.

It helped that he stayed away from the material that might have elicited boos and snickers. He didn't explain something that he often talks about: how he's sure that, if you crack down on employers, illegal immigrants will self-deport. Or why he believes it's appropriate – on his show – to couple immigration stories with segments about language and culture. Mixing these things illustrates a contradiction: Dobbs has said repeatedly that the only thing that concerns him is “illegal” immigration. But on his show he sounded the alarm bells when the Heritage Foundation put out a report warning that offering illegal immigrants a path to legalization could mean taking in as much as 100 million additional legal immigrants.

If you're sincere about one, why freak out over the other? Unless, of course, you're not as pro-legal immigration as you pretend to be. Unless, of course, what concerns you – or those you're trying to pander to – isn't just that people are coming illegally but that they change the language and cultural landscape of the country once they arrive.

There are words to describe that sort of thing. Unfortunately for those who have trouble accepting the truth about what this debate is really about – and what it's been about for more than 200 years – the words all end in “-ism.”

Navarrette can be reached by e-mail at ruben.navarrette@uniontrib.com.

This from a guy who makes his "fame and fortune" badmouthing the US and non-Latinos in general. He is on nearly every San Diego local news program spouting his treasonous garbage, all the while saying he is FOR secure borders. What a crock. He constantly defends the actions of illegal aliens, in everything from crossing over illegally, to working illegally, to getting public services, to marching waving foreign flags and demanding amnesty. But the fact that the SD Union-Tribune runs his columns regularly shows that we have no honest media, whether print or otherwise, just a bunch of agenda driven demagogues, using illegals to drive their plan of corporate governance and a New World Order regime.