Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member FedUpinFarmersBranch's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    9,603

    RI lawmakers to vote on immigration proposal

    May 12, 1:11 PM EDT


    RI lawmakers to vote on immigration proposal

    By KELSEY ABBRUZZESE



    PROVIDENCE, R.I. (AP) -- Rhode Island lawmakers are deciding whether to require private companies to use the federal E-Verify database to check the immigration status of new hires.

    House legislators plan to vote Tuesday on the bill filed by Rep. Jon Brien, D-Woonsocket, who said the legislation addresses a jobs issue.

    But, workplace and immigration advocates said the bill would implement a flawed system, put financial pressure on small businesses and discriminate against minority candidates.

    "In no uncertain terms, the purpose of the legislation is to ensure we have a legal work force on a going-forward basis," Brien said. "There's 10.5 percent unemployment in the state of Rhode Island. We want to ensure any and all jobs in the state are going to those that are work-eligible."

    Because the bill has been approved in the House each of the last two years, Brien said he expects it to pass again. In the past, the measure has died in the Senate.

    According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, 12 states require some form of E-Verify. Gov. Don Carcieri signed an executive order in March 2008 that forces the state to verify the immigration status of new government workers, as well as employees of any company that does business with the state. When he signed the order, the governor said studies estimated 20,000 to 40,000 illegal immigrants were in Rhode Island and he blamed them for straining state services.

    The order also requires state police and prison officials to identify immigration violators in state custody and report them to federal authorities for possible deportation.

    Jenny Rosario, who resigned from the governor's Commission on Hispanic Affairs in protest of the order, said the legislation plays into anti-immigration sentiment and would burden companies with the cost of implementing the system.

    "How can they expect the small businesses to get involved in an investment like that if the economy's so bad in Rhode Island? I really believe that they have an ulterior motive." Rosario said. "I hope the Legislature looks at the facts rather than emotions."

    Rachel Miller, director of Rhode Island Jobs with Justice, said errors create much of the cost of the program - the database itself is free - since current employees have to spend time resolving non-confirmation for certain new hires, with a greater burden for companies with small human resources departments.

    Miller cited statistics from the Social Security Administration that as many as 3.6 million workers could be misidentified through E-Verify.

    Under Brien's bill, the state Department of Labor and Training would refer noncompliance cases to federal immigration authorities to determine penalties. The measure includes all Rhode Island employers with three or more workers.

    Mandating E-Verify for every employer is a source of concern for the business community. Bethany Costello, spokeswoman for the Greater Providence Chamber of Commerce, said the error rate and federal criteria for the database make it more complicated than proponents suggest.

    "We don't want to put barriers on hiring, especially in this current economic climate," Costello said. "We don't want to make it more difficult for businesses to grow in Rhode Island."

    http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/R/ ... TE=DEFAULT
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    5,262
    Rachel Miller, director of Rhode Island Jobs with Justice, said errors create much of the cost of the program - the database itself is free - since current employees have to spend time resolving non-confirmation for certain new hires, with a greater burden for companies with small human resources departments.
    JwJ is an organization fighting for a blanket amnesty. Resolution can be outsourced.
    I support enforcement and see its lack as bad for the 3rd World as well. Remittances are now mostly spent on consumption not production assets. Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member misterbill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,084

    Liar, liar, pants on fire!!!

    From an Arizona newspaper article (among many).
    "E-Verify, the federal online program that checks an employee's legal work status, is a free program available to employers and is required for new hires under the sanctions law.





    Federal authorities say checking names on E-Verify is a process that usually takes no longer than a few minutes per name. Using the program for new hires gives business the presumption of trying to not hire illegal workers.

    Some large-scale business owners have said that the process has forced them to create positions just to ensure compliance with the state law.

    [i]Sheer BS--large companies will spend more time entering a hard copy folder into a file cabinet than entering a name online.[/i]

    Some small-business groups have said the law will force the smallest employers to get computers and go online, (You must be kidding me-- a PC can be written off as a cost of business, so can the cost of DSL) an expense that cuts into their already-thin margins.

    There are also third-party businesses known as designated agents that can handle employment-verification services for employers, including E-Verify checks and processing I-9 forms."

    The lies are so bad and nobody seems to challenge them OR the MSM chooses not to report that fact when they do.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •