Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    762

    PRESIDENTIAL FRONTRUNNERS WOULD SURRENDER AMERICA'S BORDERS

    PRESIDENTIAL FRONTRUNNERS WOULD SURRENDER AMERICA'S BORDERS





    By Pastor Chuck Baldwin

    February 6, 2007

    NewsWithViews.com

    Looking at the potential presidential frontrunners for both the Democrat and Republican parties reveals that virtually everyone of them would surrender America's borders. Not one of the presidential frontrunners from either party would protect our borders against illegal immigration. Just the opposite. They would continue George Bush's policy of wide open borders, including his determination to grant amnesty to illegals. In other words, when it comes to protecting our borders, there is not a nickel's worth of difference between the two major parties' leading presidential contenders.

    Democratic presidential frontrunners include John Edwards, Barak Obama, and Hillary Clinton. Republican frontrunners include John McCain, Mitt Romney, and Rudy Giuliani.

    In fact, virtually every Democratic candidate, and even the vast majority of Republican candidates, would provide no relief to America's border problems. And, yes, that includes Sam Brownback and Newt Gingrich. Notable exceptions include Duncan Hunter, Ron Paul, and Tom Tancredo, with Tancredo at the head of the class.

    Obviously, should Hunter, Paul, or Tancredo miraculously win the White House, the push for a North American Union (NAU) complete with a NAFTA superhighway and a trilateral, hemispheric government, would be stopped dead in its tracks. For this reason, the GOP machine (and the insiders who control it) will never allow someone such as Duncan Hunter, Ron Paul, or Tom Tancredo to obtain the nomination.

    It's time the American people faced a hard, cold reality: no matter who the two major parties nominate in November 2008, the push for open borders, amnesty for illegal aliens, and the NAU will continue unabated. In other words, anyone one believes that unimpeded illegal immigration (and related issues) just might be the biggest threat to our national sovereignty and security (and count me as one who does) will not be able to vote for either the Republican or Democratic nominee in 2008. It's time to start preparing for that reality now.

    Does that mean that Republicans should not do everything they can to help Tancredo, Paul, or Hunter gain the nomination? Of course not. If the vast majority of the GOP rank and file would get solidly behind these three men, one of them might have a chance of succeeding. However, the track record of the GOP faithful is not very reassuring.

    Instead of supporting principled, uncompromising men of integrity, such as the three men named above, Republican voters will doubtless buy into the party mantra of pragmatism and help nominate another spineless globalist such as currently occupies the White House, which will leave us exactly where we are now.

    So, here is the sixty-four million dollar question: What will principled conservative voters do in 2008? My hope and prayer is that after failing to receive their party's nomination, Ron Paul, Tom Tancredo, and Duncan Hunter (or at least one of them) will leave the party and bring their (his) followers to the Constitution Party (CP). In all likelihood, the CP will have ballot access in over 45 states. It is already the third largest political party in the country and is currently the fastest growing political party in the nation. A national leader such as Paul, Tancredo, or Hunter would provide the CP with a very attractive alternative to the globalist candidates being offered by the two major parties.
    By nature, I am not a single issue voter. However, I am sensible enough to realize that there are currently a handful of issues that will literally make or break America's future. And right now, the illegal immigration and emerging North American Union issues are at the very top of the list. Further failure on these issues will mean the end of America as we know it. And I mean very soon.
    Regardless of what Hunter, Paul, and Tancredo ultimately do, Republicans, Democrats, and Independents who believe we must protect America's borders, stop the burgeoning North American Union, and secure our national sovereignty must be prepared to abandon the two major parties' presidential nominees in 2008 and support an "America First" third party candidate. Even a virtually unknown candidate with limited experience, but someone who understands the issues and has the backbone to do what is right, would be head and shoulders above what the two major parties are currently shoving down our throats.

    Better start preparing yourselves for it now, folks.

    © 2007 Chuck Baldwin - All Rights Reserved
    http://www.newswithviews.com/baldwin/baldwin345.htm

  2. #2
    Administrator Jean's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    California
    Posts
    65,443


    Great article!
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  3. #3
    Senior Member nittygritty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    3,251
    Very good!
    Build the dam fence post haste!

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    165
    Great story. However, Chuck missed something. In March 2006, Condoleeza Rice announced that the SPP was on track for completion in 2010. She also said that the SPP was now on automatic and no longer required the involvement of the President to keep it going. I take this to also say that a loyal American President would not be able to stop this. We have to realize that the Trilateral Commission inserted globalist supporters in every department of the government. When taking into consideration the sheer numbers of traitors listed in the SPP work group documents and also in the Pentagon's Banff notes, we are talking about 150 to as high as 300 traitors.
    These people are determined to succeed at all costs. If they succeed, our country is gone.I would like to believe that we can stop this with the 2008 elections, but, reality is like a suffocating cloud. I have been making contact with my Seal team commander that I served under for 6 years. Hopefully, things will change for the better.

  5. #5
    MW
    MW is offline
    Senior Member MW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    25,717
    cassie, are you out there? Please read this:

    By nature, I am not a single issue voter. However, I am sensible enough to realize that there are currently a handful of issues that will literally make or break America's future. And right now, the illegal immigration and emerging North American Union issues are at the very top of the list. Further failure on these issues will mean the end of America as we know it. And I mean very soon.

    "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" ** Edmund Burke**

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts athttps://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    florida
    Posts
    1,726
    Also the CFR members are all over the Congres
    I was checing the list, it's scary..

  7. #7
    Senior Member AlturaCt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Roanoke, VA
    Posts
    1,890
    Amen MW! If we lose this. We lose our country.

    will never allow someone such as Duncan Hunter, Ron Paul, or Tom Tancredo to obtain the nomination.
    That is what concerns me. We need to work on the nomination process. Grass roots. The RNC has no intention of allowing that to happen. I firmly believe they can be elected but the RINO's and the RNC in particular will do all they can to make sure the nomination never happens.

    I notice too that many of the same RINO's are all over themselves now that Gulani has come out. He seems to be the new anointed one.
    [b]Civilizations die from suicide, not by murder.
    - Arnold J. Toynbee

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •