Thread: 5 ways Osama bin Laden changed the immigration landscape

Five ways in which Osama bin Laden changed the immigration landscape

May 2, 2011 | 11:03 AM
By Leslie Berestein Rojas

Post-9/11 security legislation known as the REAL ID Act allowed the government to waive environmental laws and litigation blocking border fence construction near San Diego, which called for filling in a canyon with 1.5 million cubic yards of dirt. Photo by Romel Jacinto/Flickr (Creative Commons)

The direct and indirect repercussions that the late Osama bin Laden’s actions in masterminding the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 have had on the agencies, policies and attitudes affecting immigrants in the United States are far too many to mention in a short list.

The attacks led to the dissolution of the federal immigration infrastructure at the time, to numerous legislative and policy changes affecting immigrants, and to an increasingly enforcement-heavy and divisive immigration climate. Here are a few of the major changes:

1) The end of INS, the beginning of DHS: Criticism of the decades-old Immigration and Naturalization Service, after it it was discovered that some of the 9/11 hijackers were here on visas that shouldn’t have been granted, led to the end of the INS in early 2003. The agency, which at the time governed all immigration functions from visas to border security, was replaced by the much broader Department of Homeland Security. Three sub-agencies within DHS were given authority over immigration matters: U.S. Customs and Border Protection (overseeing customs and border security, including the U.S. Border Patrol); U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, overseeing functions such as naturalization and the granting of legal residency; and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, which is responsible for immigration enforcement in the United States, oversees immigrant detention and deportation, and is responsible for enforcement policies such as Secure Communities and 287(g).

2) The Patriot Act: Less than two months after the 9/11 attacks, Congress passed the “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001,â€

What I don't understand is how come the government knows the threat of religious radicals as terrorism but doesn't know the threat of nationalistic/ethnic radicals as terrorism (except the white kind)? Don't they realize that you don't have to have bomb threats against you from a hate group in order to label them as terrorists????

I feel like writing the Prez and saying "Well done on bin Laudin....now please tell me when you're going to move on "La Raza"?