Thread: UNC study finds problems with 287(g) program

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

By: UNC School of Law News Release

CHAPEL HILL -- A federal law granting local police and sheriffs the power to act as immigration officials when faced with dangerous criminals or terrorists has instead created a climate of racial profiling and community insecurity, according to researchers at the UNC School of Law.

The team of law students, led by Deborah Weissman, Reef C. Ivey II Distinguished Professor of Law and Director of Clinical Programs at UNC School of Law, and Katherine Parker and Rebecca Headen, lawyers with the ACLU in North Carolina Legal Foundation, released a report on the 287(g) program in North Carolina titled "The Policies and Politics of Local Immigration Enforcement Law" on Wednesday, Feb. 18 at 9:30 a.m. in the board room at the UNC School of Law, 160 Ridge Road, Chapel Hill.

Weissman and her team began working on the report last year as a policy project assigned to law students enrolled in the Immigration and Human Rights Policy Clinic.

"The ACLU of N.C. brought to our attention that this relatively new program was catching on fast in North Carolina, and it brought with it some tremendous problems for the community," explained Weissman.

After an extensive review of the program and data from partner organizations, the federal government, and community interviews, they have produced a 152-page report on the program detailing its weaknesses and proposing solutions, including greater transparency and a functional system for complaints or appeals.

"Students studied the contracts between local law enforcement agencies and the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) that grant immigration authority to local law enforcement and found that the agencies we most closely reviewed have failed to comply with these contracts. We found serious erosion of community trust, as well as legal concerns," said Weissman, who adds that the program may be costly for local law enforcement. "There are a number of law enforcement associations who think the program distracts from their core mission."

Attorneys with the ACLU of N.C. recognized something had to be done after negative stories and complaints from Latinos and others in 287(g) counties began to increase.

"When communities begin to feel victimized because of their race or ethnicity, we encourage communication with law enforcement, but we also must investigate the matter. North Carolina has become a national testing ground for programs between ICE and local officers. This report shows North Carolina, and the nation, the pitfalls of those programs," said Rebecca Headen, Staff Attorney with the ACLU of N.C. Racial Justice Project.

Because immigration law is complicated and constantly changing, Weissman notes that many local law enforcement officials may not have the most current information about an individual's true immigration status. What happens to individuals once they are arrested under this program is the subject of another project for Weissman and her team.

"The stories we hear are heartbreaking. The implementation of this program does not seem to comport with our time-honored values of due process of law" said Weissman, who believes concerned citizens should become involved with the decisions their local government makes about participating in these and similar programs. "People have to ask themselves what kind of community they want to live in."




share
Email this Story to a Friend Print this story Weatherdaytime
48 evening
51 overnight
48 7-day forecast |today |allergy
travel |radar |tropics


Snap Poll2-18-09
Do you agree with a new UNC School of Law study that says the 287(g) immigration program creates a climate of racial profiling?
Yes
No
Not sure


Please select an answer














Home Terms of Use Privacy Policy Contact Information Site Map
Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.

Copyright © 2008 TWEAN Newschannel of Raleigh, L.L.C. dba News 14 Carolina

Web production by Tipit — Powered by News Gecko
10.11.12.97




3%

Yes (6)
20%

No (23)
77%


Total of votes : 30
Powered by .NETPolls!


http://news14.com/content/poll_results/ ... PollID=831

Illegals do not deserve "due process" rights as they are NOT citizens of the United States. They are in fact, terrorists.

"The stories we hear are heartbreaking. The implementation of this program does not seem to comport with our time-honored values of due process of law" said Weissman, who believes concerned citizens should become involved with the decisions their local government makes about participating in these and similar programs. "People have to ask themselves what kind of community they want to live in."

As a US citizen I am involved and I've demanded 287(g) in my community.

The community I want to live in has 287(g) and NO illegal aliens.

Well of course the ACLU would find fault with 287g! They find fault with EVERYTHING that benefits Americans by holding accountable the criminal element in our society- - illegal aliens, terrorists, drug addicts, sex offenders, ....

The ACLU should change it's name to the UN-American Civil Liberties Union.

Attorneys with the ACLU of N.C. recognized something had to be done after negative stories and complaints from Latinos and others in 287(g) counties began to increase.

If some Latinos and the ACLU are complaining it's because 287(g) actually works! EVERYONE who comes into a jail facility would have their credentials checked! Not just Latinos!

"The ACLU of N.C. brought to our attention that this relatively new program was catching on fast in North Carolina, and it brought with it some tremendous problems for the community," explained Weissman.

Since when is deporting illegal invaders who have been arrested for probable cause of committing a crime a "problem" for the community at large? I guess Weissman should talk to the parents of Jamel Shaw and ask them what their opinion is regarding "tremendous problems!"

If he needs more material for his bogus research, he could always get in touch with Mrs. Bolonga, the widow who had her entire family executed at the hands of an illegal invader gangbanger, who might have been deported if SF had implemented 287(g).

Perhaps these people ( and countless other who have lost family members at the hands of illegal invaders) would have been able to provide valuable insight to the "tremendous problems" that NOT implementing 287(g) has caused their family.

Where is the testimony of those people in your so called "study" Mr. Weissman?

Originally Posted by NoBueno

Attorneys with the ACLU of N.C. recognized something had to be done after negative stories and complaints from Latinos and others in 287(g) counties began to increase.

If some Latinos and the ACLU are complaining it's because 287(g) actually works! EVERYONE who comes into a jail facility would have their credentials checked! Not just Latinos!

[quote:1aty0orz]"The ACLU of N.C. brought to our attention that this relatively new program was catching on fast in North Carolina, and it brought with it some tremendous problems for the community," explained Weissman.

Since when is deporting illegal invaders who have been arrested for probable cause of committing a crime a "problem" for the community at large? I guess Weissman should talk to the parents of Jamel Shaw and ask them what their opinion is regarding "tremendous problems!"

If he needs more material for his bogus research, he could always get in touch with Mrs. Bolonga, the widow who had her entire family executed at the hands of an illegal invader gangbanger, who might have been deported if SF had implemented 287(g).

Perhaps these people ( and countless other who have lost family members at the hands of illegal invaders) would have been able to provide valuable insight to the "tremendous problems" that NOT implementing 287(g) has caused their family.

Where is the testimony of those people in your so called "study" Mr. Weissman?[/quote:1aty0orz]

I agree wholeheartedly. All people who are jailed need to have their immigration status checked. Millions of Americans don't care what country they invaded from...if they're here illegally, we want them gone!

Originally Posted by NoBueno

Attorneys with the ACLU of N.C. recognized something had to be done after negative stories and complaints from Latinos and others in 287(g) counties began to increase.

If some Latinos and the ACLU are complaining it's because 287(g) actually works! EVERYONE who comes into a jail facility would have their credentials checked! Not just Latinos!

[quote:2pkmjmrj]"The ACLU of N.C. brought to our attention that this relatively new program was catching on fast in North Carolina, and it brought with it some tremendous problems for the community," explained Weissman.

Since when is deporting illegal invaders who have been arrested for probable cause of committing a crime a "problem" for the community at large? I guess Weissman should talk to the parents of Jamel Shaw and ask them what their opinion is regarding "tremendous problems!"

If he needs more material for his bogus research, he could always get in touch with Mrs. Bolonga, the widow who had her entire family executed at the hands of an illegal invader gangbanger, who might have been deported if SF had implemented 287(g).

Perhaps these people ( and countless other who have lost family members at the hands of illegal invaders) would have been able to provide valuable insight to the "tremendous problems" that NOT implementing 287(g) has caused their family.

Where is the testimony of those people in your so called "study" Mr. Weissman?[/quote:2pkmjmrj]

And, again the ACLU is involved. Does that surprise anyone?

I get so sick of these people...it all comes down to they do not believe in the rule of law or enforcing the laws!!

Do you agree with a new UNC School of Law study that says the 287(g) immigration program creates a climate of racial profiling?
Yes (21)
23%
Not sure (12)
13%
No (59)
64%
Total of votes : 92

Yep! Go vote in the poll, everyone! Let your voices be heard. Maybe once these punk law students get a load of how America feels about it, they'll learn the error of their ways. They're young and their vision is clouded by idealism and while idealism sounds wonderful, it frequently has nothing to do with reality.