Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member PatrioticMe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    2,009

    Stage set for Neb. illegal immigration fight

    Stage set for Neb. illegal immigration fight





    Associated Press - January 16, 2009 4:55 PM ET

    LINCOLN, Neb. (AP) - Nebraska Gov. Dave Heineman is again pushing for a requirement that state and local agencies verify residents are here legally before providing them with public benefits.

    On Friday, state Sen. Russ Karpisek of Wilber introduced a bill (LB403) in the Legislature, on Heineman's behalf. Among the benefits covered in the bill are food assistance, unemployment, public housing, welfare and retirement.

    Unlike a similar bill pushed by Heineman last year that was not approved, it would not also repeal a law that allows children of illegal immigrants to receive in-state tuition.

    Critics of the bill last year said immigrants already are prohibited under a 1996 federal law from receiving most state benefits.


    On the Net:

    Nebraska Legislature: http://www.nebraskalegislature.gov

    Copyright 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

    http://www.nebraska.tv/Global/story.asp ... =menu605_2

  2. #2
    Senior Member miguelina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    9,253
    Critics of the bill last year said immigrants already are prohibited under a 1996 federal law from receiving most state benefits.
    Really? Then why are they receiving in-state tuiton?? If it's already against the law, there shouldn't be a problem asking for proof is there?
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
    "

  3. #3
    Senior Member PatrioticMe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    2,009
    Quote Originally Posted by miguelina
    Critics of the bill last year said immigrants already are prohibited under a 1996 federal law from receiving most state benefits.
    Really? Then why are they receiving in-state tuiton?? If it's already against the law, there shouldn't be a problem asking for proof is there?
    Excellent point! As always.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •