Thread: ONLY WAY TO STOP BUSH'S PROMOTION OF ILLEGALS INVADING

ONLY WAY TO STOP BUSH'S PROMOTION OF ILLEGALS INVADING AMERICA

By: Devvy
January 17, 2004
NewsWithViews.com

"We are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the God of Nature has placed in our power.. the battle, sir, is not to the strong alone, it is to the vigilant, the active, the brave." -- Patrick Henry
Last week, President Bush announced his newest move in completing another step towards the new world order his father worked to facilitate, as did former presidents like Harry Truman [1]. Bush, Jr., was breast fed on the milk of globalism. Bush knows no other way of thinking. This man was raised in a protective environment where the promotion of globalism and a one world order was drummed into his head from the cradle to the White House.
The “religious right” went hog wild to get him elected because Bush comes across as a religious fellow, frequently referring to God (Allah) or toting a Bible. So did Bill Clinton. Bush probably does believe abortion is “wrong,” but his goody two-shoes wife, Laura, is a pro abortion advocate who wants Roe v Wade to stay on the books.[2] Must make for a very interesting relationship: one is for killing unborn babies, the other against it. Kind of like that other carny side show, Matlin and Carville.
A sitting president who endorses breaking the law
Most conservatives weren't surprised when former Commander in Deceit, Bill Clinton, routinely broke the law and committed treason (selling our defense secrets to the communist Chinese). But, now, the shoe is on the other foot and popular talk show hosts like Shawn Hannity appear even more intellectually challenged than usual by attempting to justify Bush’s promotion of criminal acts and the wholesale invasion of our Republic.
There can be no question that Bush’s plan to give amnesty to illegal aliens is the promotion of lawlessness. It doesn't matter how nice an illegal might be or how cheap they will work. It doesn't matter if they have been here illegally for one week or one decade. If they sneak across the border, they have committed a crime under our laws and are subject to immediate deportation.
These illegals are not "immigrants" or "undocumented workers," they are illegal aliens. They enter this country by breaking our law. They have no right to any constitutional protections. The only thing illegal aliens should expect from their criminal entry into these united States is deportment. You don't reward those who break the law with a free pass, yet that is exactly what Bush is going to do if the people don't stop it.
Patrick Buchanan’s recent assessment of Bush's promotion of criminal activity is right on point: "The president of the United States is making a concession in order to win Hispanic votes,"[3] Conservatives accused Clinton of selling out America for votes. What say those same people now?
Bush contends that allowing illegal aliens to live and work in our nation is good for the economy and fills jobs Americans don't want. That isn't the point, Mr. Bush. Illegal aliens are here illegally and they must be deported under our immigration laws. To reward such illegal activity, even by a sitting President, is still criminal.
Our economy is near dead on the operating table and any company who wants to ship our jobs off U.S. soil or employ illegals for cheaper wages to increase the bottom profit line for stockholders doesn't get my money. I don't need your "things." I support my fellow Americans and their jobs, even if the cost is higher, so put that in your shrinking profit margin.
The parasite feeds off the host
This is a very important factor in the equation. Pro illegal immigration attorneys (parasites) feed off illegal aliens. Any individuals who work for the anti-American organization, National Council of La Raza, are parasites who feed off the host. Federal judges who unconstitutionally give illegal aliens free medical care and other perks are also parasites that feed off the host: Congress and the White House. There is an entire food chain connected to this massive, illegal alien invasion, all parasites who must feed off the host to keep making money. They care nothing for the law and what's right for America. The almighty buck is all that matters to these parasites.
Destroying the infrastructure of the states
The states of the union, particularly the border states, are dying under the massive financial weight of illegal aliens. In California alone, it is acknowledged that there are about 3 million illegal aliens costing the taxpayers roughly $8 billion dollars a year. Cities can only take so much population before their infrastructures begin to crumble and when you allow 3 million illegal bodies to reside in just one state like California, mostly concentrated in Little Mexico (Los Angeles), the predictable collapse is all but a fait accompli.
The legal systems of these states stagger under the weight of processing crimes committed by criminals who illegally enter this country. Oh, I can already hear the bleeding hearts chanting that not all illegal aliens who enter this country illegally commit crimes. That's real easy to say for those who haven't had their life ruined by illegals, i.e. illegal aliens who drive the streets of America.
The parasites need to open their eyes and take a good hard look in the mirror. Lenin called parasites "useful fools." Illegal immigration is just part and parcel to the bigger picture of destroying our sovereign Republic. Take a good look at this map published in the Denver Post, August 30, 1992, a mere four months before Bush, Sr. signed the unconstitutional NAFTA treaty into law December 17, 1992.
This map is not some academic exercise. This IS what's on the horizon for US if the people of this nation don't mobilize. What you're seeing with this latest, grotesque proposal by Bush, Jr., has everything to do with building a new world order (global governance), redistributing the wealth of our nation into the hands of illegals and riffraf from all over the world.
Conspiracy? Hardly. The master plan to destroy our Republic is there for anyone who cares to face the frightening truth: "Money, faxes and immigration drive new world order," The Philadelphia Inquirer, February 16, 1995, on the lies told to the American people about Mexico's real financial difficulties before NAFTA was passed. Clinton then came to the rescue and once again raped our nation to bail out the petty crooks who run Mexico. The bone chilling 'Proposed New Constitution for the NewStates of America from Rexford G. Tugwell's book, The Emerging Constitution" was a huge warning that's been ignored.[4]
"None is so blind as he who will not see," by Congressman James B. Utt, Congressional Record, House of Representatives, January 15, 1962, page 215: "You can expect to see a one world government, communist controlled, under the United Nations. You will see the UN run up astronomical debts which we, under the terms of the treaty, are bound to pay."
Senate Concurrent Resolution, Legislative Journal, pg. 711, 'Providing for a declaration of the Federation of the World, in the Senate, March 9, 1943. This document calls upon the General Assembly of Pennsylvania to be united in a commonwealth of nations to be known as "The Federation of the World."
Congressional Record, House, March 15, 1976, pg 8012: A Declaration of Interdependence calling for the establishment of a new world order of "compassion, peace, justice and security." June 28, 1976, Extension of Remarks, Congressional Record, Hon. Donald M. Graser of Minnesota in the House calling for an endorsement of the Declaration of Interdependence and a new world order.
Nationalism said to hinder World Order, The Evening Bulletin, Philly, April 30, 1971, former counterfeit U.S. Senator Harris Wofford states: "...that the problem of world law could not be solved as long as the sovereign nation-state remains." Sound familiar? It should: "U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor: U.S. must rely on foreign law."[5]
IRS, Department of Treasury notification to employers: 1995 Federal Tax Deposit Requirements for Semiweekly Depositors: "Provisions of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) legislation require deposits to be made by electronic fund transfer (EFT). The Mandatory use of this system will be gradually phased in over a period of years for all depositors of federal employment tax."
Why is anyone surprised that social security is going south of the border?[6] It was all set up years ago under NAFTA and linking our economy to a financially bankrupt country like Mexico. Redistribution of wealth. And while leftist organizations like the CATO Institute thinks NAFTA is nifty [7] and the Heritage Foundation promotes this social security boondoggle[8], I doubt most Americans would if they just had the truth.
Congressional Record, Appendix, May 4, 1955, Page A3016 - A3018, Congressman Lawrence Smith comments that there are people in our country today who would surrender our national sovereignty to a fictitious form of world government. He then goes on to outline with uncanny accuracy back then, the disaster just over our horizon as the infrastructure for this totalitarian one world government is now in place. Implementation only requires one more "act of terrorism."
'On the Threshold of the New World Order: The Wilsonian Vision and American Foreign Policy in the 1990s and beyond', by counterfeit U.S. Senator Joseph Biden, June 29, 1992. Biden chastises Bush, Sr. for not pushing harder to solidify the new world order so desired by Washington, DC. In Biden's speech he whacks Bush, Sr. for not going for the jugular during the first Gulf War against Saddam Hussein in pursuit of the new world order. Now you know why Billy Clinton was put into the White House.
This war in Iraq was to "liberate" the Iraqi people? Wrong, it was/is for the new world order: "In defense of the world order...U.S. soldiers would have to kill and die," Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. Foreign Affairs, July-August 1995; publication is a propaganda tool of the Council on Foreign Relations. Biden's speech made it very clear what invading Iraq was all about.
Full page ad, NY Times, April 15, 1994:
1944. Bretton Woods: The IMF and the World Bank. 1945. San Francisco: The United Nations. 1994, Marrakech: The World Trade Organization. History knows where its going. The final act of the Uruguay Round....to the WTO, the third pillar of the New World Order, along with the UN and the IMF."
In a December 6, 1993, Washington Times interview with the late billionaire financier Sir James Goldsmith, he warned that "GATT will mean social upheaval and political instability bringing far worse global consequences than the Bolshevik Revolution...If the masses understood the truth about GATT, there would be blood in the streets of many capitals." How right he was and we have seen the blood in the streets from massive protests about these insidious, destructive treaties.
Had enough?
There is only one way to thwart Bush's anti-American proposal to reward criminal activities and his proposed "immigrant worker plan" and that is at the state level. If you live in the critical border states, California, Texas, New Mexico and Arizona, you must do the same thing those heroic Tennesseeans did when they stopped their state legislators from shoving a personal state income tax down their throats: They mobilized, they fought back and they won.[9]
How many Americans are familiar with what happened in Nevada back in 1999 dubbed the 'Jarbridge Shovel Brigade'? This incident had to do with the feds and a road in Nevada. In October of 1999, a group of Elko County citizens, led by Assemblyman John Carpenter, Attorney Grant Gerber, and Chris Johnson, an area businessman, went to Jarbidge to rebuild the road, using man and horse power. They were stopped by a restraining order. They didn't let that stop them. These courageous folks out in Nevada called the government's bluff and they won. The great "General" Janet Reno flinched and the road is still open.
Conact American Border Patrol [10]. This organization is serious about fighting this illegal invasion and they can be of enormous help in your state. Start calling talk radio, mobilize whatever organization you belong to and join together for massive marches on your state capitol. Demand your National Guard be put on your border to stop any more illegals smuggling themselves into our country. Isn't 10-12 million already here enough for you? If you have recall in your state like California does, remind those public servants who work for you in the State House that you will make sure they never serve another term if they don't get the governor to get out the guard.
Form a citizens group in your county and get to your county Sheriff. Demand he uphold the law, round up illegals and deport them - now. No more coddling. They don't get to go "home" and pack up their CDs. They go back across the border right from jail. Stop putting out the welcome mat and giving constitutional rights to those who have no right to them. Make illegal entry across the border so miserable, it will deter illegals instead of encouraging them as this current President is promoting.
Illegals are a threat to our Republic. They threaten our security, they're destroying our standard of living (along with "free trade"), straining already overstrained infrastructures of cities and the criminal justice system. If I lived in one of those border states, I would be leading the non-violent assault on the State House and the public servants who work there. One woman in California, Jodi Waters, is responsible for the elimination of MTBE in gasoline. She took on the big oil companies and the State of California and won. Jodi's story makes Erin Brockovich look like minor league. Jodi was just one person, think of what can be accomplished by thousands in those border states?
There is no more fun time, golf time or couch potato time. There is only time to get organized and demand your governor, with the assistance of your state legislature, seal up your border with Mexico. Since the White House is determined to allow wholesale invasion, the sovereign states of the Union have every legal right to stop it. There is no other alternative. "Elect a conservative Republican" is about as effective as mammary glands on a bull.
As sovereign republics, the individual states of the Union have the right to repel any invasion when the federal government refuses to perform their lawful duty. There is no doubt about the intentions of Washington, DC, so it IS the duty of the citizens to demand their governor and their local sheriffs go after these illegals and deport them or they will feel the wrath of their citizenry.
Footnotes:
1. The Smithsonian Treasury: The Presidents (1991), pg 72: "When Franklin Roosevelt died during the closing days of WWII, it fell to Truman to end the war and formulate policies for the new world order."
2. ABC News, January 19, 2001, First Lady-to-be says No to overturning Roe v Wade
3. Bush: Give Illegal Workers Guest Status, NY Times, January 8, 2004 and The Meaning of Bush's Amnesty by Patrick Buchanan
4. Proposed New Constitution for the NewStates of America
5. U.S. must rely on foreign law
6. social security is going south of the border
7. NAFTA is nifty
8. social security boondoggle
9. Tennessee Tax Win
10. American Border Patrol and: Letters from Real Americans on illegals
© 2004 Devvy Kidd - All Rights Reserved
http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd29.htm

I agree with this article, especially that we need to work on the state level. We will be much more successful working from the bottom to the top.

Pressure on Governor's and State Senators, House leadership in all states to enforce the laws on the books. We need to constantly call and e mail our state peeps and let them know their job is on the line. The state leaders do not have the ability nor the means to rig elections as our Fed elected leadership, so the locals must abide by the wishes of their constituents or find another job.

I have written Easly and Coble so much now that they won't even answer me anymore
I wonder if they are trying to tell me something

I hear that Ruthiela, but I still keep writing them anyway.

Hate to sound so dumb, but does anyone know when the N.C. Senate is up for reelection?

Wasn't a dumb question Diane.............I didn't know either

North Carolina

http://www.electionprojection.com/state ... ina06.html
Latest News and Updates

Tracking initiated - 07/14/06

Conservative Ranking

North Carolina is the 21st most conservative state, voting 10.0% more Republican in the 2004 presidential elections than the national average.
Partisan Trend

Based on voting patterns since 1992, North Carolina's partisan trend is STEADY.
GOP Trend Ranking

North Carolina ranks 30th among the 50 states.

Senate Race

No race in 2006

Governor's Race

No race in 2006

Competitive House Races

District 11

Incumbent: GOP incumbent Charles Taylor is seeking a 9th term in 2006. He faced primary opposition.
GOP Candidates
Charles Taylor - Incumbent John Armor - Attorney and Author
Democrat Candidates
Heath Shulur - Former NFL Quarterback Clyde Morgan - Contractor
Party nominee -

Election Projection: Charles Taylor +1.0
Pundit Predictions

Pundit Date Prediction
The Blogging Caesar 7/14 Taylor by 3
Charlie Cook 6/29 Toss-up
Larry Sabato 6/29 Taylor by 4 (Lean GOP)
Congressional Quarterly 7/14 Taylor by 4 (Lean GOP)
Polling Data

Polling Firm Date Taylor Shuler
Public Policy 5/22 42% 46%
Projection Data - positive numbers favor the incumbent party

Index Raw value Weight Factor
Pundit predictions 2.8 70% 1.9
Head-to-head polls -4.0 25% -1.0
District partisanship 12.0 5% 0.6
Other issues Adjustment: -0.5
Projection History

Date Projection Rating
July 14, 2006 Taylor +1.0 Weak GOP Hold
Preliminary ----- Weak GOP Hold

Other House Races

Projected winner listed first District 1: G.K. Butterfield (D)-inc (unopposed) District 2: Bob Etheridge (D)-inc vs. Dan Mansell (R) District 3: Walter Jones, Jr. (R)-inc vs. Craig Weber (D) District 4: David Price (D)-inc vs. Steven Acuff (R) District 5: Virginia Foxx (R)-inc vs. Roger Sharpe? (D) District 6: Howard Coble (R)-inc vs. Rory Blake (D) District 7: Mike McIntyre (D)-inc vs. Shirley Davis (R) District 8: Robin Hayes (R)-inc vs. Larry Kissell (D) - possible competitive race District 9: Sue Myrick (R)-inc vs. Bill Glass (D) District 10: Patrick McHenry (R)-inc vs. Richard Carsner (D) District 12: Melvin Watt (D)-inc vs. Ada Fisher (R) District 13: Brad Miller (D)-inc vs. Vernon Robinson (R)

Election Timeline

February 28, 2006 - Deadline to file for candidacy May 2, 2006 - Primary elections May 30, 2006 - Primary runoff November 7, 2006 - Election day

Current Partisan Breakdown


National Delegation
Senators 2 GOP
Representatives 7 GOP, 6 DEM
State Government
Governor DEM
Lt. Governor DEM
State Senate - DEM control 20 GOP, 29 DEM, 1 vacant
State House - DEM control 57 GOP, 63 DEM

Current Office Holders

Governor: Mike Easley (D) - 2nd term, term limited in 2008 Lt. Governor: Beverly Perdue (D) - 2nd term, running for Governor in 2008 Senior Senator: Elizabeth Dole (R) - 1st term, up for re-election in 2008 Junior Senator: Richard Burr (R) - 1st term, up for re-election in 2010 House District 1: G.K. Butterfield (D) - 2nd term House District 2: Bob Etheridge (D) - 5th term House District 3: Walter Jones, Jr. (R) - 6th term House District 4: David Price (D) - 9th term House District 5: Virginia Foxx (R) - 1st term House District 6: Howard Coble (R) - 11th term House District 7: Mike McIntyre (D) - 5th term House District 8: Robin Hayes (R) - 4th term House District 9: Sue Myrick (R) - 6th term House District 10: Patrick McHenry (R) - 1st term House District 11: Charles Taylor (R) - 8th term House District 12: Melvin Watt (D) - 7th term House District 13: Brad Miller (D) - 2nd term

Tour The 50 States

Next Stop: North Dakota
Previous Stop: New York

Special Thanks to...

Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections - Dave Leip
Campaignline's Political Oddsmaker - Ron Faucheux
The Cook Political Report - Charlie Cook
The Crystal Ball - Larry Sabato
DC's Political Report - D.C. Finegold Sachs
RealClearPolitics - Tom Bevan and John McIntyre