Thread: Access Washington: An Update on Immigration Reform

Access Washington: An Update on Immigration Reform

New America Media, News Analysis, Mary Ambrose, Posted: May 06, 2007

Editor’s Note: Access Washington is a new series offered by New America Media to ethnic media, linking them with experts on immigration law reform. NAM’s Managing Editor Mary Ambrose reports. For more information on Access Washington, contact Sandip Roy.

SAN FRANCISCO -- Efforts to limit family re-unification visas are the most dangerous, yet least known aspect of the immigration reform now being hatched in Washington, D.C. Karen Narasaki, executive director of the Asian American Justice Center, warns that the quota of family members being allowed to join their families in the United States may be halved.

That was the most surprising news in New America Media’s new series of biweekly conference calls offered to ethnic media to enable them keep up with the fast-paced nature of immigration reform by providing access to immigration experts and activists.

Washington is buzzing with speculation and negotiation as new immigration legislation may be decided upon in the next few weeks.

Public hearings, run by the subcommittee of the House of Representatives’ Judiciary Committee, can be viewed at the Judiciary Committee website. These cover subjects such as the economic impact of immigration, said Angela Kelley, deputy director of the National Immigration Forum.

The hearings are part of the Judiciary Committee’s preparation to discuss the latest immigration bill called the STRIVE Act (HR 1645), proposed by Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.) and Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) and now co-sponsored by 60 other House representatives. Co-sponsorship improves this bill’s chances of surviving committee, said Kelley. However, it’s unclear which bill – if any – might actually move through the immigration subcommittee to the Judiciary Committee and then onto the House floor. The other spur is that the Judiciary Committee has said they will pass an immigration bill through in June. The bill then goes to the House floor and a final vote is projected for July.

Simultaneously, Senate leader Harry Reid has reserved the week of May 14 to 21 to discuss an immigration proposal from the Senate before lawmakers leave for Memorial Day. No bill has yet been introduced in the Senate. “It’s currently being hammered out “behind closed doors” said Kelley. “For anything to pass,” she added, “it will have to be bipartisan and comprehensive.” May 9 is the date to watch, Kelley says, since that is when Reid could introduce a bill in the Senate.

The biggest worry for reformers is the White House’s discussions on immigration. A group of Republican senators, led by John Kyl (R- Ariz.) and supported by the administration, is working on a set of principles to address immigration reform, according to Narasaki. The central tenet is what she called “corporate sponsorship,” which means boosting the number of temporary work visas and severely curtailing the chance for immigrants – even those who have become citizens – to bring their parents, sisters or brothers into the country. They propose that these family members could only enter as workers.

For those who have been waiting – often years – to bring their family to join them, there may be an arbitrary cut-off date (June, 2004 or May, 2005 are speculated dates). Those who have applied after the cut-off date would simply have to get back in line.

“There’s a face on the undocumented,” Narasaki said, “but there’s not as much (of a human) face on the issue of those who have been waiting a decade or more.” She urged the ethnic media to tell the stories of how many successful immigrants have come to this country, started businesses and contributed to the economy. She noted that one man who entered the United States on a family visa was Dr. David Ho, who was Time Magazine’s man of the year when he created the triple cocktail with which to fight AIDS.

The purpose of this change, proposed by anti-immigration forces, is to reduce the number of people entering the country, in the hope that by making it difficult for even guest workers to bring their families with them, they will leave. But “it’s not true,” said Kelley.

The impetus for the White House to wrestle with immigration reform is to stem “the piecemeal approaches at the local level,” says Clarissa Martinez, campaign manager of the Coalition for Immigration Reform.

All three experts agree that over the next couple of weeks, crucial negotiations are being hammered out and the state of play on this issue changes almost daily.

http://news.newamericamedia.org/news/vi ... 0&from=rss

Genesis 2:24
Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.

Genesis 6:18
But I will establish my covenant with you, and you will enter the ark—you and your sons and your wife and your sons' wives with you.

I'm sure there was room for more family members.

My point is that time and time again in the Bible, the family unit consist of the husband, wife and unmarried children. Not all these other extraneous relatives like grandpa, brothers, sisters, the cousins, aunts, in-laws, outlaws...

Yes, two generations were on the Ark but Noah was God's servant and his wife was beyond child bearing years so the sons took wives. The same instructions for the animals buy the way.

As far as I'm concrened, family visas are not for the family unit but a pull for distant relatives.

Dixie

Wasn't there an article where they said 1 in 2 people in Mexico had relatives living here? I mean I could understand aging grandparents but not every darn relative in the family tree. They want the whole crew here and then some.

Yes, the number here from Mexico is estimated to be high already. Something like a fifth of their population has come north. So there has to be a lot of family members together here now as it is. The splitting of families began when they chose to come north, don't want to hear about it at this end, sorry.