Thread: Feb. 4 US House Hearing on Unaccompanied Children

Most Western Hemisphere nations are obligated to return unaccompanied minors according to international treaty. This is because the authorities have no idea what circumstances they may be entering under. When there is no passport or official documentation that child is unaccompanied. 16 Western Hemisphere nations have signed this, not the US. http://www.oas.org/juridico/english/sigs/b-53.html


Comments on this can be directed to the Committee Chairman, Rep. Trey Gowdy via aide: anna.bartlett@mail.house.gov

The telephone contact for the Judiciary Committee is: 202-225-3951

Jan 29 2016

Immigration Subcommittee to Hold Hearing on Problems Surrounding the Ongoing Border Surge

Washington, D.C. – On Thursday, February 4, 2016 at 9:00 a.m., the Immigration and Border Security Subcommittee will hold a hearing titled, “Another Surge of Illegal Immigrants Along the Southwest Border: Is this the Obama Administration’s New Normal?” At the hearing, members will examine the swell of unaccompanied alien minors and family units crossing the southwest border and the Administration’slack of vetting of unaccompanied children’s sponsors in the U.S.

Recent statistics from the Border Patrol indicate a significant increase in the number of unaccompanied alien minors and family units illegally entering the United States. During the first quarter of Fiscal Year 2016, the number of unaccompanied alien minors illegally entering soared to over 17,000 and family units increased to 21,000. This precipitous rise in illegal entry along the southwest border by people primarily from El Salvador, Honduras, and Guatemala was created and perpetuated by the Obama Administration’s policies of non-enforcement of immigration laws and executive actions, beginning in 2011 and continuing today, which encourage them to make the dangerous journey from Central America, through Mexico, with the expectation that they will benefit from the Administration’s de facto amnesty.
Additionally, an investigation conducted by the Associated Press found that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services lowered its safety standards during the border surge and placed unaccompanied alien minors in sponsors’ homes where some were sexually assaulted, starved, or forced to work with little or no pay.
Witnesses for the hearing are:

• Mr. Brandon Judd, U.S. Border Patrol Agent and the President of the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) National Border Patrol Council
• Mr. Steven McCraw, Director, Texas Department of Public Safety
• Ms. Jessica Vaughan, Director of Policy Studies, Center for Immigration Studies
• Democrat witness to be named

Below are statements from House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.) and Immigration and Border Security Subcommittee Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) on this hearing.
Chairman Goodlatte: “The ongoing surge at the southwest border is a crisis of President Obama’s own making and places innocent children’s lives at risk. The Obama Administration’s policy of non-enforcement has encouraged these children to take the long and perilous journey to the U.S. in the first place, and these children also face very dangerous situations once they arrive as a result of the Obama Administration’s lack of due diligence. Because the Administration took shortcuts in the vetting process, several children have been delivered into the hands of criminals and abusers and have faced horrific situations. This is tragic and unacceptable.
“The House Judiciary Committee has approved several pieces of legislation that address the underlying issues causing the surge and the Immigration and Border Security Subcommittee will further examine this ongoing problem to determine if additional steps need to be taken.”
Subcommittee Chairman Gowdy: “The recent influx of illegal immigrants across our southwest border is a predictable consequence of the Obama Administration’s failure to enforce our immigration laws. This not only threatens our national security and public safety, it also endangers those unaccompanied minors risking their lives traveling to the U.S. border. President Obama consistently refuses to take the steps necessary to avoid this crisis, beginning with the faithful execution of our laws and prioritizing public safety and national security. We look forward to further examining the issue during our hearing.”
This hearing will take place in 2141 Rayburn House Office Building and will be webcast live at http://judiciary.house.gov/. Camera crews wishing to cover must be congressionally-credentialed and RSVP with the House Radio-TV Gallery at (202) 225-5214.

Permalink: http://judiciary.house.gov/index.cfm...g-border-surge

This is the Organization of American States Convention on the Return of Children. Although the US is not signatory to this (it has signed the Hague Convention which is somewhat different) 16 Western Hemisphere nations have signed it. They are obligated to return unacompanied children traveling with no official documentation. The United States should not accept people that other countries are seeking to pass through, in violation of their own covenants and protocol. The US should not encourage children to travel on their own or people to leave their countries and travel without official documentation or send children through unaccompanied.

Signatories and Ratifications Antigua and Barbuda.. / / 05/24/05 05/31/05 RA 05/31/05 8 Argentina ........... 11/24/92 01/11/01 02/15/01 RA 02/16/01 4 Belize .............. / / 06/11/97 07/16/97 RA / / Bolivia ............. 07/15/89 08/12/98 10/08/98 RA / / 7 Brazil .............. 07/15/89 03/17/94 05/03/94 RA / / Colombia ............ 07/15/89 10 12/05/08 D 03/11/09 RA / / Costa Rica .......... 05/22/97 11/22/00 04/26/01 RA / / Ecuador ............. 07/15/89 01/25/02 03/08/02 RA / / 6 Guatemala ........... 07/15/89 / / / / / / Haiti ............... 07/15/89 / / / / / / Mexico .............. 04/06/92 07/29/94 10/05/94 RA / / 5 Nicaragua............ / / 10/20/04 12/06/04 AD 06/07/05 9 Paraguay ............ 07/15/89 09/27/96 10/08/96 RA / / 2 Peru ................ 07/15/89 01/25/05 03/02/05 RA / / Uruguay ............. 07/15/89 06/05/01 08/31/01 RA / / Venezuela ........... 07/15/89 1 05/28/96 R 06/26/96 RA 05/12/97 3 B-53: INTER-AMERICAN CONVENTION ON THE INTERNATIONAL RETURN OF CHILDREN ADOPTED AT: MONTEVIDEO, URUGUAY DATE: 07/15/89 CONF/ASSEM/MEETING: FOURTH INTER-AMERICAN SPECIALIZED CONFERENCE ON PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW ENTRY INTO FORCE: 11/04/94 ON THE THIRTIETH DAY FOLLOWING THE DATE OF DEPOSIT OF THE SECOND INSTRUMENT OF RATIFICATION DEPOSITORY: OAS GENERAL SECRETARIAT (ORIGINAL INSTRUMENT AND RATIFICATIONS) TEXT: OAS, TREATY SERIES, NO. 70 UN REGISTRATION: / / No. Vol. OBSERVATIONS: For each State ratifying or acceding to the Convention after the deposit of the second instrument of ratification, the Convention shall enter into force on the thirtieth day after deposit by such State of its instrument of ratification or accession. GENERAL INFORMATION OF THE TREATY: B-53 INTER-AMERICAN CONVENTION ON THE INTERNATIONAL RETURN OF CHILDREN SCOPE Article 1 The purpose of this Convention is to secure the prompt return of children habitually resident in one State Party who have been wrongfully removed from any State to a State Party or who, having been lawfully removed, have been wrongfully retained. This Convention further seeks to secure enforcement of visitation and custody rights of parties entitled to them. Article 2 For the purposes of this Convention, a child shall be any person below the age of sixteen years. Article 3 For the purposes of this Convention: Rights of custody include rights relating to the care of the child and, in particular, the right to determine the child's place of residence; Rights of visitation include the right to take a child for a limited period of time to a place other than the child's habitual residence. Article 4 The removal or retention of a child shall be considered wrongful whenever it is in breach of the custody rights that parents, institutions or others having such rights individually or jointly exercise over the child under the law of the child's habitual residence immediately prior to the removal or retention. Article 5 Any party designated by Article 4 may, in the exercise of custody or similar rights, bring an action for the child's return. Article 6 Judicial or administrative authorities of the State Party in which the child habitually resided immediately before the removal or retention shall have jurisdiction to consider a petition for the child's return. In urgent cases, the applicant may choose, instead, to file a request for the child's return directly with authorities of the State Party in whose territory the wrongfully removed or retained child is or is thought to be when the re quest is made, or with the authorities of the State Party in which the wrongful act giving rise to the request took place. Making a request in the manner described in the preceding paragraph shall in no way alter the jurisdiction authorized by the first paragraph of this article. THE CENTRAL AUTHORITY Article 7 For the purposes of this Convention, each State Party shall designate a central authority to ensure fulfillment of the obligations established under this Convention and shall inform the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States of that designation. Specifically the Central Authority shall assist the applicant and competent authorities of the respective States in locating and returning the child. It shall also facilitate the prompt return and delivery of the child to the applicant and assist the parties in obtaining the necessary documents for proceedings under this Convention. The Central Authorities of the States Parties shall cooperate with one another and exchange information on the operation of the Convention in order to secure the prompt return of children and to achieve the other purposes of this Convention. RETURN PROCEEDINGS Article 8 A party seeking a child's return may file an application or petition with the competent authorities in accordance with Article 6: By a letter rogatory; By filing a request with a central authority; or Directly, or through diplomatic or consular channels. Article 9 The application or petition referred to in Article 8 shall contain: a. An account of the removal or retention and sufficient in formation to identify the applicant, the removed or retained child and, where possible, the person alleged to have removed or retained the child; b. Information on the presumed location of the child and on the circumstances and dates of the removal to a foreign country or of the expiration of the authorized length of stay; and c. The legal grounds for the child's return. The application or petition shall be accompanied by: A full and certified copy of a judicial or administrative opinion, if any, or of a determination on which the request is based; concise evidence of the existing situation or, if appropriate, a statement of the pertinent applicable law; Certified documents establishing the standing of the applicant; Certification of or information on the applicable law of the State of the chiId's habitual residence issued by the Central Authority of, or by any other competent source in, that State; Where necessary, translations into the official language of the requested State of all documents referred to in this article; and A statement of the measures required to effect the return of the child. A competent authority may dispense with any of the requirements or the ore sent at ion of documents called for by this article if, in its opinion, the child's return is justified. Letters rogatory or requests, and the documents attached thereto, shall not require certification if they are transmitted through diplomatic or consular channels or through the Central Authority. Article 10 The requested court, Central Authority, or other competent authorities of the State where the child is found shall, where appropriate, take all measures conducive to the voluntary return of the chide. Should a voluntary return not take place, the judicial, or administrative authorities, after verifying compliance with Article 9, shall forthwith meet with the child and take such measures to provide for its temporary custody or care as the circumstances may dictate, and shal1, where appropriate, immediately order its return. Further, the agency charged by domestic law with protecting the child's welfare shall be notified. In addition, while the application for return is pending, the competent authorities shall take the necessary steps to prevent the child from leaving their jurisdiction. Article 11 A judicial or administrative authority of the requested State is not required to order the child's return if the party raising objections to the return establishes that: The party seeking the child's return was not actually exercising its rights at the time of the removal or retention, or had consented to or subsequently acquiesced in such removal or retention; or There is a grave risk that the child' s return would expose the child to physical or psychological danger. The requested authority may also refuse to order the child's return if it finds that the child is opposed to it and if, in the judgment of the requested authority, the child's age and maturity warrant taking its views into account. Article 12 The objections mentioned in Article 11 shall be raised within a period of eight working days from the time the authorities meet with the child and brine such period to the attention of the person retaining the child. The judicial or administrative authorities shall assess the circumstances and the evidence furnished by the opposing party to support its objections to the child's return, shall ascertain the applicable law and judicial or administrative precedents of the State of the child's habitual residence, and, if necessary, shall request assistance from Central Authorities, diplomatic agents or consular officers of the States Parties. The judicial or administrative authority shall issue its decision within sixty calendar days after receipt of the objection. Article 13 If within forty-five calendar days after the requesting authority has received notice of a decision to return the child, the steps necessary for the child's return have not been taken, the return order shall become inoperative and any measures taken shall be lifted. Costs of the return shall be borne by the claimant; should the claimant lack the means, the authorities of a requesting State may defray the costs, which may be recovered from the person responsible for the wrongful removal or retention. Article 14 Proceedings under this Convention shall be commenced within one calendar year of the wrongful removal or retention. As to children whose location is unknown, the period shall run from the time they are located. Nevertheless, expiration of the one-year period shall not bar the child's return if, in the opinion of the requested authority, the circumstances so warrant, unless it is demonstrated that the child is settled in its new environment. Article 15 The fact of a child's return shall not prejudge the ultimate custody decision. Article 16 After receiving notice of a child's wrongful removal or retention as defined in Article 4, the judicial or administrative authorities of the State Party to which the child has been removed or where it is retained shall refrain from deciding on the merits of custody claims until it is determined either that the child is not to be returned under this Convention or that no request pursuant to this Convention has been lodged within a reasonable time following receipt of such notice. Article 17 The foregoing provisions shall not limit the power of a judicial or administrative authority to order the child's return at any time. LOCATING MINORS Article 18 Any person mentioned in Article 5 may directly, through the Central Authority, or through the judicial or administrative authorities of one State Party request the competent authorities of another State Party to locate children whose habitual residence is in the State of the requesting authority and who are thought to be wrongfully in the requested State. The request shall be accompanied by any information supplied by the person making the request or gathered by the requesting authority relevant to the locating of the child and the identity of the person with whom the child is presumed to be. Article 19 The Central Authority or judicial or administrative authorities of one State Party which, upon learning from a request pursuant to Article 18 that a child wrongfully outside its habitual residence is located within their jurisdiction, shall immediately take all appropriate measures to safeguard its health and prevent its concealment or removal to another jurisdiction. The location of the child shall be reported to the authorities of the requesting State. Article 20 The measures adopted pursuant to Article 19 may be lifted if the child's return is not requested within sixty calendar days after the authorities of the requesting State have been informed of the location of the child. A lifting of such measures shall not preclude exercise of the right to request the child's return in accordance with the procedures and time limits specified in this Convention. VISITATION RIGHTS Article 21 Any person with visitation rights may, pursuant to Article 6, address a request for their enforcement to the competent authorities of any State Party. The same procedures shall be followed as chose governing a request for a child's return under this Convention. GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 22 Letters rogatory and requests for the return or the locating of children may be transmitted, as appropriate, to the requested authority by the parties themselves, or through judicial, diplomatic, or consular channels, or through the Central Authority of the requesting or the requested State. Article 23 The processing of letters rogatory or requests under this Convention and the measures arising therefrom shall be free of charge and exempt from any tax, deposit or bond, however named. The parties initiating a letter rogatory or request that have appointed a person to represent them in the requested forum shall bear any expenses incurred in connection with such representation. Nevertheless, upon ordering a child's return under this Convention, the competent authorities may, where appropriate, direct the person who wrongfully removed or retained the child to pay the necessary expenses incurred by the applicant, chose incurred in locating the minor, and the costs of return. Article 24 The arrangements and measures necessary to give effect to letters rogatory shall not require the intervention of the petitioner, and shall be implemented directly by the requested authority. This procedure, however, shall not bar any party from intervening either personally or through a duly appointed representative. Article 25 A child's return under this Convention may be refused where it would be manifestly in violation of the fundamental principles of the requested State recognized by universal and regional instruments on human rights or on the rights of children. Article 26 This Convention shall not bar the competent authorities from ordering the child's immediate return when its removal or retention is a criminal offense. Article 27 As a Specialized Organization of the Organization of American States, the Inter-American Children's Institute shall be responsible for coordinating the activities of the Central Authorities within the scope of the Convention and for receiving and evaluating information from the States Parties in respect of application of the Convention. It shall also be responsible for cooperating with other international organizations competent in the matter. FINAL PROVISIONS Article 28 This Convention shall be open for signature by the Member States of the Organization of American States. Article 29 This Convention is subject to rat if teat ion. The instruments of ratification shall be deposited with the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States. Article 30 This Convention shall remain open for accession by any other State. The instruments of accession shall be deposited with the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States. Article 31 Each State may, at the time of signature, ratification or accession, make reservations to this Convention, provided that each reservation concerns one or more specific provisions and is not incompatible with the purposes and objectives of this Convention. Article 32 If a State has two or more territorial units in which different systems of law apply in relation to the matters dealt with in this Convention, it may, at the time of signature, ratification or accession, declare that this Convention shall extend to all its territorial units or to only one or more of them. Such declaration may be modified by subsequent declarations, which shall expressly indicate the territorial unit or units to which the Convention applies. Such subsequent declarations shall be transmitted to the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States, and shall become effective thirty days after the date of their receipt. Article 33 In the case of a State that, with respect to the custody of children, has two or more systems of law applicable in different territorial units: Any reference to the habitual residence in that State refers to habitual residence in a territorial unit of that State; Any reference to the law of the State of habitual residence refers to the law of the territorial unit in which the child has its habitual residence. Article 34 Among the Member States of the Organization of American States that are parties to this Convention and to the Hague Convention of October 25, 1980 on the civil aspects of international child abduction, this Convention shall prevail. However, States Parties may enter into bilateral agreements to give priority to the application of the Hague Convention. Article 35 This Convention shall limit neither the provisions of existing or future bilateral or multilateral conventions on this subject entered into by the States Parties, nor the more favorable practices that those States may observe in this area. Article 36 This Convention shall enter into force on the thirtieth day following the date of deposit of the second instrument of ratification. For each State ratifying; or acceding to the Convention after the deposit of the second instrument of ratification, the Convention shall enter into force on the thirtieth day after deposit by such State of its instrument of ratification or accession. Article 37 This Convention shall remain in force indefinitely, but any of the States Parties may denounce it. The instrument of denunciation shall be deposited with the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States. After one year from the date of deposit of the instrument of denunciation, the Convention shall no longer be in force for the denouncing State, but shall remain in force for the other States Parties. Article 38 The original instrument of this Convention, the English, French, Portuguese and Spanish texts of which are equally authentic, shall be deposited with the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States, which shall forward an authenticated copy of its text to the Secretariat of the United Nations for registration and publication in accordance with Article 102 of its Charter. The General Secretariat of the Organization of American States shall notify the Member States of that Organization and the States that have acceded to the Convention of the signatures, deposits of instruments of ratification, accession and denunciation, as well as of reservations, if any. It shall also transmit the declarations provided for in the pertinent articles of this Convention. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Plenipotentiaries, being duly authorized thereto by their respective Governments, have signed this Convention. DONE AT MONTEVIDEO. EASTERN REPUBLIC OF URUGUAY, this fifteenth day of July, one thousand nine hundred and eighty-nine.

[http://www.oas.org/dil/footer_en.htm]