Results 1 to 4 of 4
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
10-29-2010, 01:01 AM #1
Napolitano: Arizona immigration law wrong
Napolitano: Arizona immigration law wrong
By: Associated Press
PHOENIX - Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano says Arizona's law to get tough on immigration is the wrong way to get local police involved in enforcement.
Napolitano says she agrees with a district court ruling that blocked some of the most controversial parts of the law in July and that "we cannot have 50 different immigration enforcement teams across the country." Arizona is appealing the judge's ruling.
Napolitano, the former governor of Arizona, said in a Denver speech Thursday that there are better ways to involve local law enforcement in fighting illegal immigration, including the federal Secure Communities program that has been implemented in several hundred jurisdictions nationwide.
Immigrant advocates across the country have criticized the fingerprint-sharing program as too broad.
http://www.abc15.com/dpp/news/state/nap ... -law-wrongNO AMNESTY
Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.
Sign in and post comments here.
Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn
-
10-29-2010, 01:33 AM #2
- Join Date
- Nov 2006
- Location
- TEXAS - The Lone Star State
- Posts
- 16,941
get ready janet cuz 25 other states are talking about similiar AZ type laws in their states, too
-
10-29-2010, 01:44 AM #3Napolitano says she agrees with a district court ruling that blocked some of the most controversial parts of the law in July and that "we cannot have 50 different immigration enforcement teams across the country." Arizona is appealing the judge's ruling.
So, tell me Janet, why would enforcing immigration controls be any different than the "50 teams" who control and manage every other problem, aspect or initiative we have in our country?
The answer is simple: there is no difference. For you to wail that you don't want the assistance of 50 states and their 800,000 sworn, trained and ready police officers to help our country stop illegal immigration and get these people out of here is absolute insult to the intelligence of our citizens and a betrayal of their will and laws.
You should be removed from office, and while I doubt we can achieve that before November 2012, you can bet your butt you'll be kissing your job good-bye in January of 2013.
What a dumb traitor you are, Janet Napolitano. The law school that gave you a law degree should be shut down.
Article 1, Section 9 of the US Constitution:
The migration or importation of such persons as any of the states now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a tax or duty may be imposed on such importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each person.
Article 4, Section 4 of the US Constitution:
The United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a republican form of government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on application of the legislature, or of the executive (when the legislature cannot be convened) against domestic violence.A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy
Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn
-
10-29-2010, 06:49 AM #4
everyone on this ALI-PAC
is 100 % right in what they said yes janet you should not be In office . In my book & the same with all the rest of you get the hell out clean out the WHJoin our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
Durbin pushes voting rights for illegal aliens without public...
04-25-2024, 09:10 PM in Non-Citizen & illegal migrant voters