Thread: Should Mexican Reconquista fanatic Garcia be canned?

I saw this one listed at American Patrol Report.


Was it right for Pima County Public Defender Isabel Garcia to publicly protest Sheriff Arpaio, even though at the time she was protesting as a citizen and not as an employee of the state?

Yes, she has the right to protest as a citizen.

11.1% | 79 votes

Yes, she has the right but it was in poor taste.

8.5% | 60 votes

No, but she should not lose her job.

3.2% | 23 votes

No, and she should lose her job.

77.2% | 548 votes

Total: 710 votes

http://www.kvoa.com/Global/link.asp?L=329405

And while I'm on the subject.

I don't care who you are, if your aiding and abetting an illegal invader you are committing a crime.

Someone that has been to law school should know better, I would think.




Here is my two-step plan.

We may have to kiss the keisters of the illegal invaders, it is still a felony to aid and abet them.

If some honest men and women in law enforcement, would go after the lowlifes in the government, business and the general population that have been aiding and abetting them, by the time they had enough of a handle on the job to raise their heads and look around, I don’t think many illegal aliens would still be left.

We don't need any new laws to do this either. Just some honest men and women in law enforcement that take their oaths of office seriously!

Finding them is the first step!



Federal Immigration and Nationality Act
Section 8 USC 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv)(b)(iii)

"Any person who . . . encourages or induces an alien to . . . reside . . . knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such . . . residence is . . . in violation of law, shall be punished as provided . . . for each alien in respect to whom such a violation occurs . . . fined under title 18 . . . imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both."
Section 274 felonies under the federal Immigration and Nationality Act, INA 274A(a)(1)(A):
A person (including a group of persons, business, organization, or local government) commits a federal felony when she or he:
* assists an alien s/he should reasonably know is illegally in the U.S. or who lacks employment authorization, by transporting, sheltering, or assisting him or her to obtain employment, or
* encourages that alien to remain in the U.S. by referring him or her to an employer or by acting as employer or agent for an employer in any way, or
* knowingly assists illegal aliens due to personal convictions.

Yes, she has the right to protest as a citizen.
10.9% | 80 votes

Yes, she has the right but it was in poor taste.
8.3% | 61 votes

No, but she should not lose her job.
3.1% | 23 votes

No, and she should lose her job.
77.6% | 569 votes

Total: 733 votes

Was it right for Pima County Public Defender Isabel Garcia to publicly protest Sheriff Arpaio, even though at the time she was protesting as a citizen and not as an employee of the state?

Yes, she has the right to protest as a citizen.
10.9% | 80 votes


Yes, she has the right but it was in poor taste.
8.3% | 61 votes


No, but she should not lose her job.
3.1% | 23 votes


No, and she should lose her job.
77.6% | 568 votes

Total: 732 votes

Yes, she has the right to protest as a citizen.

10.9% | 80 votes

Yes, she has the right but it was in poor taste.

8.3% | 61 votes

No, but she should not lose her job.

3.1% | 23 votes

No, and she should lose her job.

77.7% | 573 votes

Total: 737 votes

(NO, LOSE HER JOB WAS MY VOTE)

Was it right for Pima County Public Defender Isabel Garcia to publicly protest Sheriff Arpaio, even though at the time she was protesting as a citizen and not as an employee of the state?

Yes, she has the right to protest as a citizen.

10.8% | 90 votes

Yes, she has the right but it was in poor taste.

7.5% | 63 votes

No, but she should not lose her job.

3.2% | 27 votes

No, and she should lose her job.

78.5% | 657 votes

Total: 837 votes

Was it right for Pima County Public Defender Isabel Garcia to publicly protest Sheriff Arpaio, even though at the time she was protesting as a citizen and not as an employee of the state?

Yes, she has the right to protest as a citizen.
9.8% | 95 votes
Yes, she has the right but it was in poor taste.
7.3% | 71 votes
No, but she should not lose her job.
3% | 29 votes
No, and she should lose her job.
80% | 778 votes

Total: 973 votes

Was it right for Pima County Public Defender Isabel Garcia to publicly protest Sheriff Arpaio, even though at the time she was protesting as a citizen and not as an employee of the state?

Yes, she has the right to protest as a citizen.
10.3% | 114 votes

Yes, she has the right but it was in poor taste.
7.1% | 79 votes

No, but she should not lose her job.
2.7% | 30 votes

No, and she should lose her job.
79.8% | 882 votes

Total: 1105 votes

Was it right for Pima County Public Defender Isabel Garcia to publicly protest Sheriff Arpaio, even though at the time she was protesting as a citizen and not as an employee of the state?

Yes, she has the right to protest as a citizen.
16.6% | 257 votes
Yes, she has the right but it was in poor taste.
7.5% | 116 votes
No, but she should not lose her job.
2.8% | 44 votes
No, and she should lose her job.
73.1% | 1135 votes
Total: 1552 votes

Yes, she has the right to protest as a citizen.
18.7% | 352 votes
Yes, she has the right but it was in poor taste.
7.6% | 142 votes
No, but she should not lose her job.
3% | 56 votes
No, and she should lose her job.
70.7% | 1328 votes
Total: 1878 votes