Thread: [Watch] Brit Hume – Obama Administration is “One of Almost Unimaginable Incompetence”

Conservative Lady

[Watch] Brit Hume – Obama Administration is “One of Almost Unimaginable Incompetence”



[Watch] Brit Hume – Obama Administration is “One of Almost Unimaginable Incompetence”

Brit Hume is interviewed on the O’Reilly factor and says that, although he wishes it weren’t so, he believes that Obama actually is caught off guard by the numerous “surprise occurrences” both domestically and around the globe. He says we are...
gopthedailydose.com

[Watch] Brit Hume – Obama Administration is “One of Almost Unimaginable Incompetence”

Posted on 17 June, 2014 by Rick Wells



Brit Hume is interviewed on the O’Reilly factor and says that, although he wishes it weren’t so, he believes that Obama actually is caught off guard by the numerous “surprise occurrences” both domestically and around the globe. He says we are coming to find out that the current administration is one of “almost unimaginable incompetence and in many respects disengagement.
While he doesn’t want to make the assumption that the various agencies aren’t trying to do their jobs and to keep the administration at large, as an entity informed, he says, “but I don’t know that this president is paying that much attention.”
Hume says he thinks that Obama is overwhelmed and he doesn’t know what to do, and that he is surprised by that as well, saying “I think he’s surprised by the fact that he’s caught off guard.”
Hume says the presidency is a job which separates the difference between being smart and wise. He says, “This president is smart enough, he is not wise enough for the job in my judgment and he is continually now, because of mistakes made in the past, issues neglected, the chickens are coming home to roost and they’re coming home in droves.”



Rick Wells is a conservative author who recognizes that our nation, our Constitution and our traditions are under a full scale assault from multiple threats. Please “Like” him on Facebook, “Follow” him on Twitter or visit www.rickwells.us

http://gopthedailydose.com/2014/06/1...-incompetence/

O'Reilly: The "Obama Administration is at the Tipping Point"

FOX News Insider:

Video at the page link:

The Obama administration severely miscalculated the reaction to trading Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, a suspected deserter, for five Taliban leaders. That was the subject of Bill O’Reilly’s Talking Points Memo.
Senator Harry Reid (D-Nev.) defended the president, saying, “Opponents of President Obama have seized upon the release of a prisoner of war – that’s what he was – using what should be a moment of unity and celebration for our nation as a chance to play political games.”
Meanwhile, Democrat and chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (CA), expressed “dismay” at the administration for failing to notify Congress at least 30 days before releasing Gitmo detainees.
Given the evidence so far, O’Reilly said there’s “no doubt” that Bergdahl deserted his unit in Afghanistan five years ago. There are allegations that he may have also collaborated with the Taliban.

The O'Reilly Factor


http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines...-tipping-point

BREAKING: Obama Orders U.S. Troops Into Volatile, Dangerous Iraq…Presumably Wearing Flip-Flops

By Norvell Rose
1 8:49 pm June 16, 2014

Only three days ago, on Friday the 13th, President Obama vowed he would not put U.S. boots on the ground in Iraq. “We will not be sending troops back into combat in Iraq,” Obama said at a White House press conference. “But I have asked my security advisers to prepare a range of other options.”
Now comes word that Obama has, in fact, ordered that several hundred armed troops be immediately deployed in and around the collapsing country. Even though these U.S. forces are “armed” — if Obama is to be believed (a BIG “if”) — they will not be fighting.
Now what kind of sense does that make? And if the president says they aren’t wearing boots because he promises “no boots on the ground”, then….
The Associated Press reports on the troop deployment:

The U.S. is…considering sending an additional contingent of special forces soldiers as Baghdad struggles to repel a rampant insurgency, even as the White House insists anew that America will not be dragged into another war.
President Barack Obama notified Congress Monday that up to 275 troops could be sent to Iraq to provide support and security for U.S. personnel and the American Embassy in Baghdad. About 170 of those forces have already arrived and another 100 soldiers be on standby in a nearby country until they are needed, a U.S. official said.
While Obama has vowed to keep U.S. forces out of combat in Iraq, he said in his notification to Congress that the personnel moving into the region are equipped for direct fighting.
And separately, three U.S. officials said the White House was considering sending a contingent of special forces soldiers to Iraq. Their limited mission — which has not yet been approved — would focus on training and advising beleaguered Iraqi troops, many of whom have fled their posts across the nation’s north and west as the al-Qaida-inspired insurgency has advanced in the worst threat to the country since American troops left in 2011.

So, the Obama administration is sending U.S. warfighters into Iraq, but they won’t be doing any fighting. Really, is this “depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is” rhetorical nonsense? Is this hollow wordplay and delicate dancing of the most cynical sort?
How does anyone know what will or will not happen in a nation being overrun by bloodthirsty insurgents affiliated with al Qaeda? Even if our soldiers are authorized only as advisors and trainers, what the heck are they supposed to do if/when terrorists start shooting at them?

http://www.libertynews.com/2014/06/b...ng-flip-flops/

you got the same coming with Hillary

Bleak Poll Results for Hillary Clinton

Updated June 19, 2014

Does Hillary Clinton have a chance at becoming our next United States President? According to the latest poll results, not likely. Even with no Republican front runner in mind yet, Clinton is not coming across favorably. It already seems like it's obvious that Hillary Clinton will receive the 2016 Democratic nomination for President, although it seemed like that last time before Barack Obama shocked everyone to surpass her.
But as of right now, only 38 percent of registered American voters say they would vote for Clinton if she decides to run for President, 37 would appose her. Without a clear opponent at the moment, observers believe Clinton should have fared far better.
Among registered Democrats, 75% said they would vote for Clinton.
For Registered Republicans, 70% said there was 'no way' they would vote for Clinton. We're actually surprised that number wasn't 100%.
Her poll results suffered even more so as a result of her book tour that is promoting her memoir, 'Hard Choices'.
NBC and the Wall Street Journal conducted the poll.
What are your thoughts?

http://www.allproudamericans.com/Ble...y-Clinton.html