Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696

    WAR NO. 3: US FIRES 112 MISSILES INTO LIBYA

    U.S. Tomahawk Cruise Missiles Hit Targets in Libya

    Pentagon: 112 Missiles Fired at More Than 20 Targets Inside Libya


    By DEVIN DWYER and LUIS MARTINEZ
    March 19, 2011
    118 comments

    More than 112 Tomahawk cruise missiles struck over 20 targets inside Libya today in the opening phase of an international military operation the Pentagon said was aimed at stopping attacks led by Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi and enforcing a U.N.-backed no-fly zone.

    Videos at the link ~ Watch: America's Military Spread too Thin?

    President Obama, speaking from Brazil shortly after he authorized the missile attacks, said they were part of a "limited military action" to protect the Libyan people.

    "I want the American people to know that the use of force is not our first choice and it's not a choice I make lightly," Obama said. "But we cannot stand idly by when a tyrant tells his people that there will be no mercy."

    The first air strikes, in what is being called Operation Odyssey Dawn, were launched from a mix of U.S. surface ships and one British submarine in the Mediterranean Sea at 2 p.m. ET, Vice Adm. William E. Gortney told reporters at a Pentagon briefing.

    They targeted Libyan air defense missile sites, early warning radar and key communications facilities around Tripoli, Misratah, and Surt, but no areas east of that or near Benghazi. Because of darkness over Libya, Gortney said it was too early to determine the strikes' effectiveness.

    Gortney said no U.S. troops were on the ground in Libya but that U.S. aircraft would be involved in the campaign. It's unclear if those planes include bombers and fighters or only support aircraft that could provide airborne surveillance, refueling and radar-jamming capabilities.

    Earlier today, French warplanes destroyed several Libyan military vehicles, including tanks, in eastern Libya, as pro-Gadhafi forces battled towards the rebel stronghold of Benghazi, French Defense officials said.

    At one point a fighter jet resembling a Libyan MiG 27 was shot down over the city, according to news reports from inside Libya.

    Meanwhile, world leaders met in Paris to discuss the nature and scope of the international military intervention to make Gadhafi respect a U.N. Security Council resolution that authorized "all necessary measures" to protect Libyan civilians.

    "Our planes are blocking the air attacks on the city" of Benghazi, French President Nicholas Sarkozy said following the meeting. It was also clear the effort would target ground forces, including tanks, that might be used against the Libyan people.

    French, British and Canadian aircraft were expected to launch sorties as night falls over the country, ahead of a larger coalition deployment that could happen later in the day. Spain and Denmark have also contributed fighter planes to the international force.

    "We have every reason to fear that left unchecked, Gadhafi would commit unspeakable atrocities," Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told reporters following the meeting in Paris. "Further delay will only put more civilians at risk. So let me be very clear on the position of the United States: We will support an international coalition as it takes all necessary measures to enforce" the U.N. resolution.

    President Obama, in Brazil for the first stop on a trip to Latin America, told reporters the international consensus on Libya remained "strong, and our resolve is clear."

    "The people of Libya must be protected," Obama said at a press conference with Brazil's President Dilma Rousseff. "And in the absence of an immediate end to the violence against civilians, our coalition is prepared to act and act with urgency."

    Gadhafi warned the international coalition Friday not to interfere in Libyan affairs, calling the U.N. resolution "invalid" and appealing directly to world leaders, including President Obama, in a letter.

    "Libya is not yours. Libya is for the Libyans," he said in the letter. "If you had found them taking over American cities with armed force, tell me what you would do."

    The United States, Britain and France issued a joint statement late Friday, with backing from several Arab countries, warning the "international community will make him [Gadhafi] suffer the consequences" unless he stops the attacks, restores water, electric and gas services and allows humanitarian aid to enter the country.

    Libya Action Follows Failed Diplomacy
    Military action in Libya follows weeks of intensive, international diplomatic pressure on Gadhafi to cease the violence and pull back from rebel-held cities.

    The Security Council approved a resolution late Thursday authorizing the international community to take "all necessary measures," short of sending in ground troops, to protect civilians in Libya, and to impose a no-fly zone. The resolution does not authorize taking out Gadhafi or regime change.

    "The [U.N.] resolution that passed lays out very clear conditions that must be met," Obama said Friday.

    "These terms are not subject to negotiation. If Gadhafi does not comply with the resolution, the international community will impose consequences and the resolution will be enforced through military action," he said.

    Exactly what role the U.S. military would play in enforcement of the resolution remains unclear.

    "We will support an international coalition as it takes all necessary measures to enforce the terms of resolution 1973," Secretary of State Clinton said today in Paris.

    But Clinton declined to detail U.S. responsibilities in a supporting an attack, other than to say that the United States would offer "unique capabilities." She emphasized that the United States will not deploy ground troops in Libya.

    During a meeting with a bipartisan group of members of Congress Friday, Obama said he expects active U.S. involvement in any military action would last just "days, not weeks," sources told ABC News.


    Decision to Use Force Came Tuesday
    Sources told ABC News that Obama's decision to support the use of force came Tuesday, following several days of internal administration deliberations and the realization that diplomatic efforts to stop the brutality of Gadhafi's regime weren't working.

    Presented with intelligence about the push of the Gadhafi regime to the rebel stronghold of Benghazi, the president told his national security team, "What we're doing isn't stopping him."

    Some in his administration, such as Clinton, had been pushing for stronger action, but it wasn't until Tuesday, administration sources tell ABC News, that the president became convinced sanctions and the threat of a no-fly zone wouldn't be enough.

    "We are not going to use force to go beyond a well-defined goal, specifically the protection of civilians in Libya," Obama said Friday.

    While the United States has been leading the charge behind the scenes, officials say, the administration deferred public action to the State Department and the United Nations in an effort to emphasize that the mission reflects a broad, international coalition, including support from Arab allies.

    World Preparing for Military Action Against Libya
    Gadhafi's son, Saif, told ABC News via a phone interview that the U.N. resolution is a "big mistake" and that if the United States wants to help, they should in fact help the government.

    "We want to live in peace, so we want even Americans to help us get rid of the remnants of those people and to have a peaceful country, more democratic," he said. "If you want to help us, help us to, you know, to be democracy, more freedom, peaceful, not to threaten us with air strikes. We will not be afraid. Come on!"

    U.S. Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Norman Schwartz said Thursday it could take upwards of a week to fully establish a no-fly zone and that public comments by some that it could be done in a few days are "overly optimistic."

    He acknowledged there are limited Air Force assets because most of them are in Iraq and Afghanistan, especially transport aircraft.

    Last week, Department of National Intelligence director James Clapper said the Libyan air force was large in raw numbers, but only a small number of aircraft were actually flying.

    A Pentagon analysis of Libya's air capabilities shows the overall readiness of Libyan aircraft is poor by Western standards and most aircraft are now dated or obsolete in terms of avionics or upgrades. Eighty percent of the air force is judged to be "non-operational and "overhaul and combat repair capability is also limited."

    ABC News' Martha Raddatz, Huma Khan, Jake Tapper, Kirit Radia, and Luis Martinez contributed to this report.

    http://abcnews.go.com/International/lib ... d=13174246
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  2. #2
    Senior Member SicNTiredInSoCal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Mexico's Maternity Ward :(
    Posts
    6,452
    Nice. The gloabalists must be rubbing their paws together in GLEE over this. WW3 here we come. They were looking for any excuse to bomb some more over there and now they have it!

    Wasn't it Oprah and Chris Rock who called Obama "The President of Peace"??
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696


    http://drudgereport.com/

    U.S., allies launch broadest international military effort since Iraq war... http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/af_libya

    Fire 110 Tomahawk missiles into Tripoli, Misrata... http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/africa/03 ... 1&iref=BN1

    'Operation Odyssey Dawn'... http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-03-1 ... ssey-.html
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  4. #4
    Senior Member patbrunz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    3,590
    Quote Originally Posted by SicNTiredInSoCal
    Nice. The gloabalists must be rubbing their paws together in GLEE over this. WW3 here we come. They were looking for any excuse to bomb some more over there and now they have it!
    Yeah, the Neocons are loving it I'm sure. We are not the policeman of the world! No more foreign entanglements!!

    Wasn't it Oprah and Chris Rock who called Obama "The President of Peace"??
    Just like Islam is the "religion of peace."

    Funny, I don't remember hearing Congress authorize another war.
    All that is necessary for evil to succeed is that good men do nothing. -Edmund Burke

  5. #5
    Senior Member oldguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,208
    It's official we are the world police sign up now as an officer of the world,
    may be the only jobs remaining in America soon.
    I'm old with many opinions few solutions.

  6. #6
    Senior Member MontereySherry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    2,370
    oldguy wrote:

    It's official we are the world police sign up now as an officer of the world,
    may be the only jobs remaining in America soon.
    Watch it, there are parents on this site who have children on these warships. Need I say more

  7. #7
    Senior Member oldguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,208
    Quote Originally Posted by MontereySherry
    oldguy wrote:

    It's official we are the world police sign up now as an officer of the world,
    may be the only jobs remaining in America soon.
    Watch it, there are parents on this site who have children on these warships. Need I say more
    Don't be so fast to jump to conclusions bud as a Vietnam vet my respect is unsurpassed for our troops you entirely missed my meaning now go rest and come back with common sense.
    I'm old with many opinions few solutions.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •