WILL THE NEXT US PRESIDENT BE UNCONSTITUTIONAL?

By NWV News Director, Jim Kouri
Posted 1:00 AM Eastern
October 30, 2008
© NewsWithViews.com

In spite of the fact that the presidential election is only a week away, some Americans are continuing their quest for access to Senator Barack Obama's original birth certificate supposedly on file in Honolulu, Hawaii, where he and his campaign claim he was born.

So far efforts to achieve the obviously simple goal of viewing a presidential candidate's birth records are being met with one roadblock after another. Making it even more suspicious is the fact that the vast majority of the mainstream news media are avoiding the issue of Obama's birth certificate as if it were the plague.

Except for some radio talk show hosts, conservative bloggers and a few TV newspeople, the mainstream media -- always willing to carry the water for the liberal-left -- are purposely ignoring the simple fact that Obama and his camp are stonewalling efforts to prove or disprove his being born a citizen, according to political strategists such as New Jersey's Mike Baker.

According to the US Constitution: "No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States..."

"When Arnold Schwarzenegger ran for -- and won -- the governorship of California, many in the liberal Republican establishment and the new media lamented the fact that he was not an American-born citizen and therefore was ineligible to run for president of this nation. Now it seems these same people are looking the other way to avoid exposing Senator Obama as an unconstitutional presidential candidate," said Baker in an interview with NewswithViews.com.

One of the largest efforts to expose Barack Obama as an illegal presidential candidate was initiated by Philip Berg, an attorney in the so-called battleground state of Pennsylvania.

Berg, the Plaintiff states in court papers that he is a life long Democrat who had always been proud of his Party:

Plaintiff is a licensed attorney in good standing and has taken an oath to uphold the United States Constitution. Plaintiff and many other citizens of the United States have donated money and time to Democratic Presidential candidates as well as to the Democratic National Committee, in reliance on promises and assurances made by the DNC in the Democratic Party Agenda. It provides that the Democrat Party’s goals, among others, are to “restore accountability, honesty and openness at all levels of government,â€