Thread: New Dem Strategy on Kavanaugh: 'U Mad?' Put him through the wringer, and then mock

PJ Media

"If they can do this to Brett Kavanaugh, they can do it to anybody. And if the Republicans reward these remorseless charlatans for this orchestrated smear campaign by capitulating to the whims of the Democrats, the voters are going to remember."

Jim Treacher looks ahead after a week of smears against this man.



New Dem Strategy on Kavanaugh: 'U Mad?'

Put him through the wringer, and then mock him when he's…

By Jim Treacher September 28, 2018
chat 542 comments



President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee, Brett Kavanaugh testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File)

I know I said I didn't want to talk about this anymore, but it really annoys me when Democrats lie to me. Yes, it happens every single day, but this one is particularly egregious.
As I said yesterday, I believe Christine Blasey Ford believes what she's saying. I also know that belief isn't evidence. We have no way to determine whether her account of decades-old events is what actually happened, because she has provided nothing at all that could prove it. She's not sure when this alleged assault occurred. She's not sure where it occurred. Nobody else can corroborate her story. Yet I'm supposed to take the word of a woman I don't know -- whose name I didn't know until two weeks ago, whose voice I didn't hear until yesterday -- as gospel.
Is she lying? I don't know. Is she delusional? I don't know. Is it a case of mistaken identity, based on a decades-old "recovered memory"? I don't know. There's no way to determine it one way or the other. There's nothing to work with. There are no facts. All she's got is her conviction. She's entitled to it, but that's not enough.
Belief isn't proof. I thought this country learned that lesson a few hundred years ago in Salem. A lot of those people thought they were doing the right thing too.
Later on yesterday, Kavanaugh testified. He was upset. He was angry and emotional. He lashed out at the people who have smeared him as a rapist. And now they're condemning him for it.
Here's a representative example, from Obama's "ethics czar":

View image on Twitter

Norm Eisen ✔ @NormEisen

Folks, we are all getting a taste of the aggression that emerged when Kavanaugh got drunk, and it ain't pretty. His demeanor is not rebutting the allegations--if anything, it is validating them.
3:24 PM - Sep 27, 2018

• 25.2K
• 13.5K people are talking about this

Brand this man a rapist. Destroy his good name. Put his family through hell. And then, when it makes him angry and upset, cite it as further proof that you're right about him. Put him through the wringer, and then mock him when he's wrung out.
Go Team Blue!
I'm supposed to accept Ford's word, based on nothing but her display of emotions. And I'm not supposed to accept Kavanaugh's word, because he got emotional. That's a neat trick, isn't it? "Heads I win, tails you lose."
Maybe you're convinced that Brett Kavanaugh is the awful person you need him to be in order to get the result you want, and his emotional reaction just goes to prove it. If so, please just ask yourself this: If you were falsely accused of a crime in front of the whole world, with no evidence except an accusation, what would your demeanor be right now? Be honest with yourself, forget the goal you're working toward, and try to put yourself in his shoes.

https://pjmedia.com/trending/new-dem...tm_medium=post

A Carnival Of Claptrap: The Public Burning Of Brett Kavanaugh



"The real problem is that the Supreme Court has been derelict in its duty for the last 80 years...It has failed to defend the Constitution against what Eisenhower called 'unwarranted influence', and what we call the Deep State..."

Sun, 09/30/2018 - 18:55
27 SHARES
Authored by Bill Bonner via Bonner & Partners,

We arrive at the end of the week.
Yesterday morning, the yard crew were putting up a stake on the Capitol lawn and laying around it a supply of tinder.
It was to be a small fire... hot and slow.
Brett Kavanaugh was duly tied to the post with his eyes wide open... neither offering an apology nor appealing to God for redemption.

Strike the Match

The first match was struck when Christine Blasey Ford took the oath and began her “high-stakes testimony” to a panel of grave-looking senators, each pretending that the fate of the nation hung in the balance.
Ms. Ford played along, citing the “civic duty” that required her to tell what happened to her in a suburban bedroom 36 years ago.
Ms. Ford says Mr. Kavanaugh tried to ravish her. Mr. Kavanaugh denies it. Obviously, one of them is bearing false witness.
And the august committee, along with the entire nation, was invited to spend another 100 million hours of its most precious and most irreplaceable resource – time – guessing which.
Committee members went to great lengths to treat Ms. Ford with the kind of cautious respect usually reserved for armed maniacs. None wanted to join Mr. Kavanaugh on the stake. They applauded her “courage” and thanked her as a heroine for coming forward.
We had our doubts. We wondered what a truly brave woman would have done. And is it really such a good idea to eliminate Supreme Court justices based on disturbing old memories that can’t be proven?
Shouldn’t she have told her parents… risking their displeasure, but getting a chance to right a wrong? Or maybe even forgotten the “uproarious laughter”… and shrugged off the incident as a learning experience? (Don’t go to parties with drunken teenagers!)
Instead, Ms. Ford turned the laughter into background music – almost a theme song – for her whole life. It explained so much, she said: her troubles in college and her troubles with men… therapy… and even her profession.
And now, with the whole nation looking… she had an opportunity to finally turn off the dreadful sound… to finally get even… to finally get justice… and to finally confirm that all her tears and fears were authentic and worthwhile.
What a glorious moment in the history of reality TV! Ms. Ford… girlish, even in her fifties… and still fragile and vulnerable…

But she was taking down a Supreme Court nominee, damaging his career, reputation, and dignity. And it was all on the basis of such an antique recollection; like an old sofa, surely it has been reupholstered, maybe several times. Mr. Kavanaugh didn’t seem to recognize it.
But the day’s circus events ended satisfactorily. The cameras smiled and the gawkers were pleased as Mr. Kavanaugh cried out in pain and anger as the flames roasted his feet.
“The whole thing just makes me sick,” said a friend.
Here at the Diary, we have no way of knowing whether Mr. Kavanaugh is an angel or a devil. But who cares; the stakes are trivial.
In the past, Supreme Court nominees weren’t asked how they treated their wives or what they got up to as teenagers. Many were probably cads or scoundrels; somehow, the Republic survived. One more rascal is not going to make any difference.
The real problem is that the Supreme Court has been derelict in its duty for the last 80 years.
It has failed to defend the Constitution against what Eisenhower called “unwarranted influence,” and what we call the Deep State.
And today, nobody who would pose a serious threat to the Deep State – Republican or Democrat – would be allowed anywhere near a seat on the court.

Show Goes On

Meanwhile, the show goes on. The U.S. is going in the hole at a rate of $4 billion every business day. Both the bull market on Wall Street and the expansion on Main Street are nearing an end – with $250 trillion of debt outstanding worldwide.
And the president thinks Canada – Canada, with whom we have no trade deficit – has been cheating the U.S. for decades.
He also thinks the U.S. loses $800 billion a year in bad trade deals (we send foreigners fake money; they send us real goods).
But he told the United Nations that the U.S. economy is doing great…
And the Fed is delusional, too. As good as this economy is, it thinks it can make it even better by raising its key interest rate, putting it about even with consumer price inflation.
Early in the century, the whole silly spectacle would have been preposterous.
Nobody cared about a Supreme Court justice’s teenage sex life; they only cared if he was a decent judge. Nobody cared what the president thought of trade between Canada and the U.S.; it was none of his business.
And nobody would have imagined that POTUS would tell them with whom they could do business (the U.S. now “sanctions” some 30 different countries)…
Or that the Fed – we didn’t even have a central bank until 1913 – would decide who made money and who didn’t, transferring $4 trillion of fake money to the rich and not a dime to the working classes.
But that was then. This is now.
And today, we live with a Carnival of Claptrap that never stops.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-...rett-kavanaugh

Laura Ingraham shared a link.




Democrats Try to Blow Open Flake-Coons FBI Compromise

Image Credit: Chip Somodevilla / Zach Gibson / Getty Images

Liberal Hypocrisy

Democrats Try to Blow Open the Flake-Coons FBI Compromise

Klobuchar bids to expand scope as Hirono balks at time constraints on new investigation of Kavanaugh allegations

By Michele Blood | Sunday, September 30, 2018

White House press secretary Sarah Sanders (pictured above center) told Fox News’ Chris Wallace on Sunday that President Donald Trump’s administration will not “micromanage” the FBI’s supplemental investigation of Judge Brett Kavanaugh — but Democrats are pushing to do just that.
“The White House counsel has allowed the Senate to dictate what these terms look like and what the scope of the investigation is,” Sanders told Wallace. “The White House isn’t intervening. We’re not micromanaging this process.”
Sanders cautioned, however, that “we cannot allow the people that have acted in bad faith to determine and allow this to become a total fishing expedition by the FBI.”
The new FBI review was directed by Trump late Friday after Republicans and Democrats on the Senate Committee on the Judiciary agreed to Sen. Jeff Flake’s suggestion earlier in the day that it be “limited in time and scope.”
Trump told the FBI to examine “all credible allegations.” Flake was encouraged in his suggestion by Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.).
Related: Anita Hill’s Case Proves Christine Blasey Ford Has a Lot to Gain
Sanders called Senate Democrats “absolutely disgraceful” in their handling of the process and added that both Kavanaugh and Christine Blasey Ford, who alleged that the 53-year-old federal judge sexually assaulted her at a high school house party decades ago when the two were teenagers, had been “exploited” as a result.

Donald J. Trump ✔ @realDonaldTrump

Judge Kavanaugh showed America exactly why I nominated him. His testimony was powerful, honest, and riveting. Democrats’ search and destroy strategy is disgraceful and this process has been a total sham and effort to delay, obstruct, and resist. The Senate must vote!
6:46 PM - Sep 27, 2018

• 320K
• 183K people are talking about this

“The people who have been bad actors in this, as the president laid out in his tweet, are the Democrats,” said Sanders when Wallace asked her if Sens. Flake, Collins (R-Maine), and Murkowski (R-Alaska) — who may well cast the decisive votes on Kavanaugh’s confirmation — had fallen for the Democrats’ “total sham” that Trump referenced in a fiery tweet on Thursday.

Sanders chastised Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and her team, whom Sanders said should have honored Ford’s original request for anonymity by handling the matter behind closed doors.

Meanwhile, the Democrats’ “fishing expedition” is well along.
On ABC’s “This Week” and CNN’s “State of the Union” on Sunday morning, Sens. Hirono (D-Hawaii) and Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) respectively pushed for removing all time and scope constraints on the FBI even though both had supported Flake’s proposal.
“Every Senate vote matters, and there’s time to get to the bottom of it. Even if it’s seven days, that’s bad enough. But then to limit the FBI as to the scope and who they’re going to question, that really … I want to use the word ‘farce,’ but … ” Hirono (pictured above right) told host Stephanopoulos, trailing off, when he asked her if she thought accuser Julie Swetnick’s allegations were credible.”

“They all came forward with credible reports. They all said that they would be willing to talk to the FBI,” Hirono added.
Swetnick claimed through porn star lawyer Michael Avenatti that Kavanaugh was involved in a “ring” during his high school years that got girls drunk, then gang-raped them.
For her part, Klobuchar (pictured above left) told CNN’s Jake Tapper, “The White House should not be allowed to micromanage an FBI investigation.”
Tapper reminded Klobuchar that his previous guest, Trump senior counselor Kellyanne Conway, denied any “micromanagement” by the White House.
Related: Graham Calls for Investigation of Feinstein’s Office, Ford’s Lawyers

“What we are hearing is there are reports they are somehow trying to limit this to a few witnesses or tell them what they should do,” Klobuchar insisted.
Tapper pressed, asking if Klobuchar had evidence of this supposed White House-based interference in the investigation beyond the “reports” she had seen.
“I am basing this on reports,” said Klobuchar. “I just want to see this be conducted in a fair, independent way, which Sen. Flake has asked for.” She added that it is the responsibility of the three undecided Republican senators to ensure that the FBI’s investigation is “credible from beginning to end.”
“I don’t know, Jake. That’s why I think she has to be interviewed by the FBI,” said Klobuchar when Tapper asked if she found Julie Swetnick’s allegation credible.
“I do believe in due process. And she did sign an affidavit. And I think it needs to be looked into,” Klobuchar concluded.

https://www.lifezette.com/2018/09/de...bi-compromise/

Democrats Post Most Offensive Kavanaugh Cartoon of ALL TIME

By Steve Straub
September 30, 2018 at 6:36pm

Democrats and their media supporters have left the reservation and gone beyond the pale by publishing what could be the most offensive political cartoon we’ve EVER seen.


This is just disgusting and everyone needs to see this:

From Illinois Times editorial cartoonist Chris Britt.
How can a man do this to another man’s child?
How can editors allow this to pass? What corrupt and wicked hearts Democrats have.
They are PIGS, straight up.
Turns Out, Blasey-Ford Has a LOT to Gain by Accusing Kavanaugh
One of the most common claims made by Democrats is that Christine Blasey-Ford has nothing to gain by accusing SCOTUS nominee Brett Kavanaugh but that’s not entirely true.
Turns out it could be worth a LOT of money for her, here’s why:
Advertisement - story continues below

When Professor Anita Hill resigned from the faculty of the University of Oklahoma law school in 1995, she wasn’t teaching, she was instead working on the first of two books for which she had a deal worth more than $1 million with Doubleday Publishing Co.
It’s doubtful Hill would have been able to command such a price if she had not four years earlier claimed in 1991 that then-Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas, her former boss at a federal agency, had made improper sexual advances toward her. …
Hill’s experience more than two decades ago is inevitably being recalled now after another professor, Christine Blasey Ford, accused Judge Brett Kavanaugh of sexually molesting her in the early 1980s during a high school party.
Again, millions of Americans believe the accuser and millions more see major problems with her account, which Kavanaugh has forcibly and repeatedly denied.
His nomination is now awaiting the results of what Senate Republicans and Democrats agreed Friday would be a one-week FBI investigation of Ford’s claims.
One of the most frequently heard arguments on Ford’s behalf is the claim that she “doesn’t stand to gain anything” by coming forward with her allegations about Kavanaugh.
But regardless of whether her allegations are true or false, the reality is Ford is all but certain to be offered a huge advance for a book detailing her experiences.
The $1 million advance Hill received in 1992 following the Thomas debacle would be worth $1.8 million today.
Given the even more sensational nature of Ford’s accusations, compared to Hill’s, however, it is entirely conceivable that the amount required to win an intensely competitive bidding war will be far in excess of that amount.
Something else that didn’t exist in 1991 is the GoFundMe phenomenon made possible by the Internet.
Ford has already benefitted significantly, with supporters creating two such accounts that have raised an immense amount of money.
One of the accounts — Help Christine Blasey Ford — raised $528,475 from 11,950 separate donations in 11 days. The owners of the account closed it Friday, promising “a statement of gratitude from the family will be forthcoming in the next 48 hours. They are eternally grateful. Thank you again for your support.”
The second of the accounts — Cover Dr. Blasey’s Security Costs — raised $209,987 from 6,658 donors before it was also closed after an 11-day run. This account was organized by Georgetown Law Professor Heidi Feldman to cover security costs for the Ford family.
So even before potentially lucrative book deals accusing Kavanaugh has already been worth more than $700,000 to Blasey-Ford.
Who knew there could be a lot of money in derailing one of Trump’s SCOTUS nominees for the Democrats?
Facebook has greatly reduced the distribution of our stories in our readers' newsfeeds and is instead promoting mainstream media sources. When you share to your friends, however, you greatly help distribute our content. Please take a moment and consider sharing this article with your friends and family. Thank you.

https://thefederalistpapers.org/opin...h-cartoon-time

Ben Shapiro

This is vile.



dailywire.com

USA Today Columnist Calls Brett Kavanaugh A Sex Offender, Questions Why He's Coaching Kids…

All of this is going to back-fire on all the DemoQuacks and any others who participate in it. It's a national disgrace what is going on.

I hope she writes that book behind bars...where she needs to be!