Thread: Australian who won 'right to die' case has died

Australian who won 'right to die' case has died

The Associated Press
4:06 p.m. September 20, 2009

PERTH, Australia — An Australian quadriplegic who recently won a landmark court case allowing him to refuse food and water from his nursing home died Monday, his brother said.

Christian Rossiter, 49, succumbed to a chest infection, his brother, Tim, said in a statement.

"I thank all those who have made Christian's life, in his final years, as comfortable and as dignified as possible," the statement said.

Rossiter, who broke his spine in 2004 in a road accident and was left a spastic quadriplegic after a fall last year, had described his life as "a living hell." In mid-August, the Australian state Supreme Court ruled that Rossiter's nursing home in the west coast city of Perth must respect his decision to starve to death.

"Death I suspect comes as quite a relief for Christian," Rossiter's lawyer, John Hammond, told Seven Network television. "I think Christian will be remembered as someone who was very brave and took up a fight which will give a lot of people comfort."

The Seven Network reported that Rossiter had refused medical treatment for the chest infection.

Rossiter had asked his nursing home at least 40 times to stop feeding and hydrating him through a tube to his stomach before the matter was taken to court.

The case shed light on a gray area in Australian law: patients have a right to refuse lifesaving treatment but helping another to commit suicide is a crime punishable by life in prison. Rossiter's nursing home had sought a court ruling on its legal culpability before agreeing to Rossiter's repeated requests to stop feeding him.

In court, the judge said Rossiter clearly had a right to direct – and refuse – his treatment.

Food and fluid should not be administered against his wishes but medical staff must fully inform Rossiter of the consequences, the judge ruled.
Hammond said the ruling was not about euthanasia, but about giving people the right to refuse treatment if they are dying.

http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/ ... dex=169274

This is a very sad and difficult situation, if the person that is dying and their family want to stop hydration and food; some claim it is cruel to put the dying person through such a grueling death. Some believe that giving the dying person something to let them die painlessly would be more merciful.

While others believe it is a sin not to take every measure to preserve life.


These decisions are very difficult and personal, that's why the gov't should not be part of making these kinds of decisions for individuals and/or families.

This person made this decision for himself.

He had to fight the government to have his wishes honored.