Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member Airbornesapper07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    63,252

    Sen. Mark Warner: “Congress will have to set social media regulations”

    Sen. Mark Warner: “Congress will have to set social media regulations” … says the “era of the Wild West in social media” is over




    (Natural News) Total censorship of the internet is headed our way -- and Senator Mark Warner (D-VA) is driving the bus. Warner, the vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, has drafted up a 20-point plan for full-blown government seizure of the Internet of Things. The Left is launching an all-out war on American freedom by … [Read More...]

  2. #2
    Senior Member Airbornesapper07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    63,252
    Sen. Mark Warner: “Congress will have to set social media regulations” … says the “era of the Wild West in social media” is over

    Thursday, September 06, 2018 by: Vicki Batts
    Tags: censorshiip, death of free speech, democrats, First Amendment, free speech, government regulation, information control, insane policies, Mark Warner, political bias, Social media, technocrats, thought suppression

    540 Views

    (Natural News) Total censorship of the internet is headed our way — and Senator Mark Warner (D-VA) is driving the bus. Warner, the vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, has drafted up a 20-point plan for full-blown government seizure of the Internet of Things. The Left is launching an all-out war on American freedom by instituting policies that echo those seen in Communist China, where the internet and journalism are strictly controlled and tightly monitored. The IoT is ultimately a public platform, no different than a town square or other public space — and therefore, should not be subject to censorship.
    The left-wing is set on trampling all over the First Amendment rights of American citizens — and Warner has just written up a 23-page piece of legislation to get the ball rolling. If they don’t like what you have to say, Democrats want to take away your right to say it.

    Legislative attack on free speech begins

    On Capitol Hill, Warner and his political cohorts grilled Silicon Valley leaders over the vulnerabilities of a free, unregulated IoT. Warner contended, “The era of the Wild West in social media is coming to an end, where we go from here, though, is an open question.” According to him, it’s time for Congress to butt in.
    The answer to the question of regulating the IoT is not censorship — at least not in the United States. Regulating the internet will, ultimately, lead to the regulation of the free press. And when government regulates speech, it is no longer “free.”
    Under the poorly fitted guise of “public good,” leftists like Warner propose that the government can “protect” the public from dangerous thoughts by regulating the IoT, and instituting pathways for government to “educate” people on “media literacy” and for government agencies to take down “threats to democracy.”
    As The Republican Standard reports, Warner’s 20-point proposal is broken down into three key sections: combating disinformation, protecting user privacy, and promoting competition in tech. But as the Standard notes, most of Warner’s proposals fail to accomplish the latter.
    Among the most controversial of Warner’s ideas is his proposed changes to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Warner’s proposal suggests that platforms should be legally accountable for “state-law torts (defamation, false light, public disclosure of private facts) for failure to take down deep fake or other manipulated audio/video content.”
    Warner himself notes that distinguishing “true disinformation” from “satire” could prove difficult. Free speech advocates are vehemently against this measure. As the Standard argues, ” Such revisions to Section 230 could mean that the threat of liability will encourage both social media platforms and online service providers to tip towards the side of content takedown, even if such content does not violate standards of practice.”

    Re-education or brainwashing?

    Worse still, Warner has proposed a “re-education” measure, funded by the feds and implemented by the states. The “public initiative for media literacy,” as he calls it, would be “focused on building media literacy from an early age [which] would help build long-term resilience to foreign manipulation of our democracy.”
    This sounds an awful lot like a diplomatic code for brainwashing. How this program would work, or what would be taught, is not specified — again, prompting concerns about government overreach. Now Warner wants the government to tell people what they should and should not read, hear or see?
    As sources note, if even just a handful of Warner’s tyrannical ideas become laws, freedom of speech as we know it will cease to exist — at least on the internet. Further, the costs of Warner’s measures greatly prohibit the formation of new social media platforms and other tech.
    The regressive policies of the Left will do nothing but crush freedom and stifle innovation. But maybe that’s what they want.

    Read more stories about proposed leftist policies that would change our country at Censored.news.

    Sources for this article include:

    ZeroHedge.com
    FCW.com
    FoxNews.com
    TheRepublicanStandard.com


    https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-09-...gulations.html

  3. #3
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    55,883
    We do not want the government involved in any content regulation on social media or any other free speech medium. We already have anti-discrimination laws. We already have certain decency laws. We already have criminal laws. We already have civil laws that regulate fair trade and protect against libel and slander, fraud and deceptive trade practices. We already have privacy laws. We already have all the laws we need for a free and fair, legal and safe, social media, and every other media, with the exception of course of the current political witch hunts waged by the US Department of Justice which to me are the greatest most dangerous threat against free speech and political association in the history of our country.
    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Similar Threads

  1. Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey Testifies to Congress About Social Media Platform Controls, F
    By Airbornesapper07 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-06-2018, 08:30 PM
  2. Mark Zuckerberg’s Social Media Accounts Hacked By Saudi Arabia-Based Group OurMine
    By European Knight in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-06-2016, 08:13 AM
  3. Mark Warner (D-VA) US Senate Voted for Amnesty for Illegal Aliens
    By ALIPAC in forum Illegal Alien Amnesty Supporters To Blame
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-30-2014, 11:25 PM
  4. Shak Hill, Republican, Primary, US Senate, Virginia, hoping to challenge Mark Warner
    By ALIPAC in forum ALIPAC Campaigns & Elections Endorsements 2004-2024
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-21-2014, 10:24 PM
  5. Did Mark Warner (Senator, Virginia) vote?
    By immigration2009 in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 12-21-2010, 01:29 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •