Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Mexifornia
    Posts
    2,174

    Great Britain: "License to Smoke' proposed...

    I'm not a smoker, but this sounds like something the City Council in L.A. would impose. Instead of imposing so-called 'sin taxes' to pay for illegal immigration, it would be much smarter just to get rid of all of them! Soon we will be taxed on the air we breathe!
    Last Updated: Friday, 15 February 2008, 17:16 GMT



    '£10 licence to smoke' proposed

    Smokers would have to get a licence to light up under the plan
    Smokers could be forced to pay £10 for a permit to buy tobacco if a government health advisory body gets its way.
    No one would be able to buy cigarettes without the permit, under the idea proposed by Health England.

    Its chairman, Professor Julian Le Grand, told BBC Radio 5 Live the scheme would make a big difference to the number of people giving up smoking.

    But smokers' rights group Forest described the idea as "outrageous", given how much tax smokers already pay.

    Professor Le Grand, a former adviser to ex-PM Tony Blair, said cash raised by the proposed scheme would go to the NHS.

    He said it was the inconvenience of getting a permit - as much as the cost - that would deter people from persisting with the smoking habit.

    "You've got to get a form, a complex form - the government's good at complex forms; you have got to get a photograph.

    "It's a little bit of a problem to actually do it, so you have got to make a conscious decision every year to opt in to being a smoker."

    'Extra bureaucracy'

    He added: "70% of smokers actually want to stop smoking.

    "So if you just make it that little bit more difficult for them to actually re-start or even to start in the first place, yes I think it will make a big difference."

    But Forest said it would be "an extra form of taxation, while tobacco taxation is already at record levels".

    Forest spokesman Simon Clark said that when the cost of administration, extra bureaucracy and enforcement are taken into account, "the mind boggles".

    He added that the people most affected by the proposals would be "the elderly and people on low incomes".

    Mr Clark added: "The senior government advisor putting this idea forward is not only adding to the red tape and bureaucracy we already have in this country.

    "He is openly bragging that he wants to make the form as complex as possible to fill in."

    A department of health spokeswoman did not rule out such a scheme as part of the next wave of tobacco regulation.

    She said: "We will be consulting later this year on the next steps on tobacco control.

    "Ministers are seeking input from a whole range of stakeholders.




    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7247470.stm

  2. #2
    Senior Member redpony353's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    SF
    Posts
    4,883
    THIS IS JUST A WAY TO GET MORE MONEY. EVERYONE KNOWS THAT SMOKERS DIE YOUNG. THEY SHOULD BE GLAD FOR THAT BECAUSE THEN THEY WILL BE OFF THE BENEFIT ROLL FOR THE ELDERLY. IN FACT THEY SHOULD JUST TELL THEM TO SMOKE MORE. IT WOULD SOLVE A LOT OF PROBLEMS. SMOKING TAX HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH TRYING TO MAKE PEOPLE QUIT. IF THEY WANTED PEOPLE TO QUIT THEY WOULD MAKE IT ILLEGAL. THEY JUST WANT TO MAKE MONEY FROM IT.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •