Results 1 to 1 of 1
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
06-25-2014, 11:47 AM #1
Supreme Court limits police right to search cell phones
Supreme Court limits police right to search cell phones
Reuters
10:09 a.m. CDT, June 25, 2014
The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled that police officers usually need a warrant before they can search an arrested suspect's cellphone.
The court said on a 9-0 vote in an opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts that the right of police to search an arrested suspect at the scene without a warrant does not extend in most circumstances to data held on a cellphone. There are some emergency situations in which a warrantless search would be permitted, the court noted.
The ruling is a blow to law enforcement agencies that would prefer more latitude to search without having to obtain a warrant.
"We cannot deny that our decision today will have an impact on the ability of law enforcement to combat crime," Roberts wrote.
The right to privacy, he said, "comes at a cost."
The court was weighing two separate cases that pitted evolving expectations of privacy against the interests of the law enforcement community as the court for the first time weighed the increasingly ubiquitous role of cellphones in modern day life.
The defendants challenging their convictions, David Riley and Brima Wurie, said evidence found on their phones should not have been used at trial because the searches were conducted without court-issued warrants.
The circumstances in the two cases, one from Massachusetts and one from California, were different, both in terms of the scope of the search and the type of cellphone used. Wurie had a basic flip phone while Riley had a more sophisticated smartphone.
The court decided the two cases together, finding that both searches were unconstitutional.
The legal question was whether the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which bars unreasonable searches, requires police following an arrest to get court approval before a cellphone can be searched.
The cases are Riley v. California, 13-132 and U.S. v. Wurie, 13-212.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-supreme-court-cell-phone-20140625,0,3825343.storyNO AMNESTY
Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.
Sign in and post comments here.
Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn
Similar Threads
-
Supreme Court Strikes Down Aggregate Campaign Contribution Limits
By JohnDoe2 in forum General DiscussionReplies: 2Last Post: 01-26-2015, 10:44 PM -
Supreme Court limits federal oversight of Voting Rights Act
By JohnDoe2 in forum General DiscussionReplies: 3Last Post: 06-25-2013, 05:33 PM -
America 2012: The Supreme Court Has Made It Legal For The Police To Strip Search You
By kathyet in forum Other Topics News and IssuesReplies: 0Last Post: 04-13-2012, 12:04 PM -
Supreme Court Removes Limits on Corporate, Labor Donations t
By florgal in forum Other Topics News and IssuesReplies: 7Last Post: 01-22-2010, 11:02 AM -
Supreme Court limits scope of Votings Rights Act
By FedUpinFarmersBranch in forum Other Topics News and IssuesReplies: 0Last Post: 03-10-2009, 06:14 PM
Arizona GOP pushing tough, new border policies, but faces strong...
05-05-2024, 10:24 AM in illegal immigration News Stories & Reports