Thread: Truth about CDC vaccine fraud revealed by Jon Rappoport in new video interview

Truth about CDC vaccine fraud revealed by Jon Rappoport in new video interview

Friday, August 29, 2014
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger

(NaturalNews) We've just posted a Health Ranger Report interview with investigative journalist Jon Rappoport, one of the last remaining honest investigative journalists in America.

The full interview is available on YouTube. The interview was recorded right before Dr. Thompson made a public confession of a CDC conspiracy to commit scientific fraud and bury evidence linking MMR vaccines to autism.

Dr. Thompson's admission of scientific fraud at the CDC is now a matter of public record, even though the corporate-run media is continuing its total media blackout on the story, condemning countless more African-American babies to vaccine violence while the truth remains hidden.

In this interview, I discuss with Rappoport the latest developments in the MMR vaccine fraud revelations, including the widespread media cover-up, the history of U.S. government medical experiments on African-Americans, the criminality of the CDC and its money-laundering scientists, and why the CDC is little more than a regulatory pawn of the vaccine industry.

Watch the full interview here:



Jon Rappoport also posted a very insightful story about CNN's desperate resorting to serial liars to "defend" MMR vaccines and lie to the public about their safety.

Here is Rappoport's full article:

CNN asks serial lying liar to comment on the CDC whistleblower scandal


by Jon Rappoport from NoMoreFakeNews.com

Yesterday, CNN published an article about CDC whistleblower William Thompson.

(CNN: "Journal questions validity of autism and vaccine study" -- the CNN reporter for this story is Debra Goldschmidt (twitter: @debgcnn). Jacque Wilson and Miriam Falco also contributed to this story. The story is augmented with a video featuring CNN senior medical correspondent Elizabeth Cohen (twitter: @elizcohencnn)...)

The day before yesterday, Thompson confessed that he and other CDC coauthors fabricated a 2004 CDC study, in order to hide an MMR-vaccine connection to autism.

Those other co-authors included Dr. Frank DeStefano. DeStefano was the lead author of the 2004 study.

So naturally... CNN goes to DeStefano for a quote defending the safety of vaccines, and De Stefano, the accused liar, tells another lie without blushing, without missing a beat.

He says:

"We know the brain and cellular features for children begin when the child is still in the womb. The brain is already developing the wiring that will manifest in autism."

In other words, according to DeStefano, vaccines couldn't cause autism, because it's already forming before the child has ever had a vaccine.

If that were true, why bother to do thousands of studies that allege there is no vaccine-autism connection?

DeStefano is lying. If he had proof -- brain-scan pictures -- that show autism forming in the womb, the world would have seen them by now. Those pictures would be front and center in the DSM, the official bible of mental disorders. Those pictures, in fact, would be the diagnostic test that confirms the presence of autism.

But guess what? If you go to the DSM and the definition of autism, you will find no defining diagnostic tests. No brain scans. No pictures. No blood test. No urine test. No genetic assay.

Frank DeStefano is a liar.

DeStefano is a very important serial liar at the CDC. He isn't just a liar who lied in the 2004 study that exonerated the MMR vaccine.

He has authored work exonerating mercury in vaccines.

And DeStefano isn't just an author. No. He happens to be, since 2004, when he lied about the MMR vaccine, the Acting Chief of the CDC's Immunization Safety Branch of the National Immunization Program.

DeStefano is The Man when it comes to vaccine safety.

The Lying Man. He is in charge of other liars.

Good work, CNN. You're upholding your reputation as the most trusted name in serial lying.

- Jon Rappoport

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/046662_va...#ixzz3GLccXuwv



This is an excellent video!!

The Obama Administration Proposed $72 Million In CDC Cuts Back In 2012

Matt Vespa | Oct 16, 2014







“Republican cuts kill;” that’s an ad run by the Agenda Project Action Fund. Of all the things in the world, liberals have decided to politicize a deadly, incurable infectious disease to attack Republicans. Guy and Katie have written about the absurdity of this claim; even the Washington Post gave it four pinocchios:

This ad is simply a more extreme version of a new Democratic talking point — that GOP budget cuts have harmed the nation’s ability to handle the Ebola outbreak. It mixes statistics — the budget for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) “cut” $585 million (the ad offers no date range) — with disturbing images of the outbreak and various Republican leaders saying variations of the word “cut.” On many levels, this line of attack is absurd.
Obama’s Republican predecessor oversaw big increases in public-health sector spending, and both Democrats and Republicans in recent years have broadly supported efforts to rein in federal spending. Sequestration resulted from a bipartisan agreement. In some years, Congress has allocated more money for NIH and CDC than the Obama administration requested. Meanwhile, contrary to the suggestion of the DCCC ad, there never was a specific vote on funding to prevent Ebola.

If we are going to talk about spending, let’s bring in the CDC’s priorities, like why has more money gone to the “community transformation grant program” than programs that help fight and prevent infectious diseases. Also, as Guy wrote:

Republican budget "cuts" simply slow down the overall rate of spending increases. Even the dreaded sequester -- which was President Obama's idea, changes to which he vowed to veto -- barely dented spending at all. Reason's Nick Gillespie has an excellent post full of facts and charts to refute the DEADLY CUTS! hyperventilating. To put things in perspective, President Clinton's last budget (FY 2000) called for $1.77 trillion in federal spending. A decade-and-a-half later, we're steadily marching toward $4 trillion in outlays, having accrued well over $17 trillion in debt, with tens of trillions more looming in unpaid-for promises. The notion that the federal government is spending every single one of those dollars responsibly is laughable. The federal budget is rife with waste, inefficiencies and reckless long-term math. John Hayward's apt summary: "We don't have an under-funded government. We have a bad government." Republicans are right to fight for needed reforms and restraint -- and doing so does not entail far-fetched side effects such as aiding and abetting Ebola. And by the way, if that insane Ebola ad reminds you of this startling smear of Paul Ryan in 2011, it might be because both spots were produced by the same group.

So, let’s play by Agenda Project's rules for a second. Do they think cutting $72 million from the CDC for public health preparedness and response is a rational move? If not, they have to call the Obama White House to find out why they proposed such cuts in their 2012 budget (via Daily Caller):

Obama’s original budget plan for fiscal year 2012 cut funding for a CDC public health emergency preparedness program by $72 million. The proposed cuts would have taken money away from municipal and state health departments to hire health workers and monitor for public health hazards and disease outbreaks. The CDC budget plan (p. 40) lists vast “Decreases” in funding for categories including public health preparedness and response, including the Public Health Emergency Preparedness Grant Program, as well as environmental health, chronic disease prevention, public health scientific services, and occupational safety and health.

In the end, both the White House and GOP budget plans failed, but the Obama administration seemed content with cutting some funds from the CDC. Now, in the end, both GOP and Obama budgets plans failed and sequestration was a bipartisan agreement, so one must wonder how the Agenda Project put this this Republicans=death narrative together. Frankly, I wouldn't waste your time on it.
Hopefully, this sort of overreach will kill future attack ads of this nature on both sides.

---

Matt Vespa

Matt Vespa is the Web Editor and Community Manager at Townhall.com. He previously worked for CNS News and was the recipient of Americans for Prosperity Foundation's 2013 Andrew Breitbart Award for Excellence in Online Activism and Investigative Reporting.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattves...-2012-n1906162