Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. 12-15-2009, 11:02 PM #1
    AirborneSapper7
    AirborneSapper7 is offline
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696

    Geneva Conventions: 'No penitentiaries for POWs'

    AUDIONETDAILY

    WorldNetDaily Exclusive

    Geneva Conventions: 'No penitentiaries for POWs'

    Ex-Gitmo prosecutor warns of potential legal problems for Obama administration --WND

    http://live.radioamerica.org/loudwater/ ... 9&name=wnd
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 12-16-2009, 12:25 AM #2
    ShockedinCalifornia
    ShockedinCalifornia is offline
    Senior Member ShockedinCalifornia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    2,901
    Amazing. Max-plus security penentiaries could be against Geneva convention POW rules.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 12-16-2009, 06:57 AM #3
    Judy
    Judy is offline
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    55,883
    They should have left them in GITMO. I have no clue why Obama wanted to close GITMO and move these people into the US.
    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules