Thread: SAVING SOLDIERS FROM GAY DEATH put our troops in further dan

SAVING SOLDIERS FROM GAY DEATH

By Cliff Kincaid
May 28, 2010
NewsWithViews.com

There is a simple reason why the gay rights lobby is trying to rush through repeal of the Pentagon’s homosexual exclusion policy. They know that a comprehensive review of a proposed change would disclose the substantial evidence that admission of open and active homosexuals would put our troops in further danger through exposure to tainted blood. In fact, evidence to this effect is already in the hands of top military commanders and Pentagon officers.

The Pentagon understands that 19,000 soldiers already have HIV/AIDS and that some -- if not most -- came down with the deadly disease through prohibited gay sexual conduct. It is common sense that opening the ranks to open and active homosexuals would only increase this problem.

Here’s another critical fact that a comprehensive review would disclose --there is no blood test that can be guaranteed to screen HIV and other deadly diseases out of the blood supply once the gay males, who are currently prohibited from donating blood, are welcomed into the services.

Meantime, Peter Sprigg of the Family Research Council reports in a blockbuster new study that the evidence indicates that a disproportionate number of assaults in the military are committed by homosexuals.

The evidence, in short, already demonstrates a significant problem of homosexual misconduct in the Armed Forces, even though such behavior is supposed to be prohibited.

Oblivious to the demonstrated need to tighten up rather than loosen the current policy, the Washington Post has editorialized in favor of a quick congressional vote, saying it is “reprehensibleâ€

Young people going into the service have to go through "boot camp". This is where they learn the basics of being a service person ( A "G.I."- in preparation to become an airman, a soldier, a sailor or a Marine. ) In this process they are the under the TOTAL and COMPLETE power of the people in charge. They are treated as "nothing' , as 'slaves' to the will of the person in charge. Thats tremendous power over these people. Would you want you or your young son or daughter to be at the mercy of an openly homosexual master? Of course not.
The whole idea of removing the ban is “reprehensibleâ€