The case was dismissed because they allegedly filed under the wrong statute

Tuesday, December 30, 2008
Keyes v. Lingle: Wrong Statute!? ..wtf?
NO. 29473

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I

CONSTITUTION PARTY; ALAN L. KEYES, Plaintiffs,

vs.

LINDA LINGLE in her official capacity as Governor of the
State of Hawai‘i; KEVIN B. CRONIN in his official capacity as
the Chief Election Officer for the State of Hawai‘i; JOHN
DOES 1-50; JANE DOES 1-50; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-50; DOE
CORPORATIONS 1-50; AND DOE ENTITIES 1-50, Defendants.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER OF DISMISSAL
(By: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Acoba and Duffy, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the Complaint to Contest the 2008 Presidential Election submitted by Plaintiffs Constitution Party and Alan L. Keyes, the Motion to Dismiss submitted by Defendants Governor Linda L. Lingle and Chief Election Officer Kevin B. Cronin, it appears the Plaintiffs style the complaint as an election contest brought pursuant to Hawai‘i Revised Statutes §§ 11-172 and 11-174.5, but allege, in pertinent part, that Defendant Cronin failed to require proof that candidate Barack Obama was qualified to be a candidate for President of the United States. Any challenge to the Chief Election Officer's finding of eligibility of a presidential candidate in the State of Hawai‘i must be pursued in accordance with HRS § 11-113(e), not sections 11-172 and 11-174.5. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is granted and this case is dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai‘i, December 5, 2008.

"in accordance with HRS § 11-113(e)"

"(e) If the applicant, or any other party, individual, or group with a candidate on the presidential ballot, objects to the finding of eligibility or disqualification the person may, not later than 4:30 p.m. on the fifth day after the finding, file a request in writing with the chief election officer for a hearing on the question. A hearing shall be called not later than 4:30 p.m. on the tenth day after the receipt of the request and shall be conducted in accord with chapter 91. A decision shall be issued not later than 4:30 p.m. on the fifth day after the conclusion of the hearing. [L 1970, c 26, pt of §2; am L 1973, c 217, §1(ff); am L 1977, c 189, §1(; am L 1983, c 34, §14; am L 1993, c 304, §6]

HAWAII BALLOT FACTSHEET

EXHIBIT A: affidavit #1!

EXHIBIT C: affidavit #2!!
http://laika22.blogspot.com/2008/12/key ... e-wtf.html


However, I find this very, very interesting:

[quote]Keyes V. Lingle, Hawaii, Sandra Ramsey Lines analysis, forensic document examiner, Obama COLB, Ron Polarik, Daily Kos, Obama Campaign, Factcheck.org COLB not reliable
December 29, 2008 · 37 Comments

The Right Side of Life website has an update on the Keyes V.
Lingle case in Hawaii. However, the bigger story revealed is
the documentation provided by forensic document examiner
Sandra Ramsey Lines. Ms. Lines corroborates the analysis
done by Ron Polarik of the so called Obama COLB.

“2. I have reviewed the attached affidavit posted on the internet
from “Ron Polarik,â€