Thread: All Christians Must Oppose ObamaCare

All Christians Must Oppose ObamaCare

Faith & Freedom

Posted by Ian Huyett on 17 Jan 2014 / 3 Comments 43

I’m a Protestant, and I stand with the Little Sisters of the Poor. You can too.

by Ian Huyett

In a hard-hitting new column, Judge Andrew Napolitano, a traditionalist Roman Catholic, discusses those provisions of ObamaCare that will require American Catholics to finance contraception, sterilization and abortion in violation of Catholic teaching.

I am not a Catholic. As a Christian, however, I agree that there is a mounting government offensive against religious liberty in the United States. I’ve found this complaint increasingly common among Christians around the country. I believe that American Christians of all denominations must, and can, respond by becoming a powerful force for small government.
Let me explain why.

Judge Napolitano’s Argument

Napolitano offers an incisive analysis of President Obama’s thinking on the issue. Obama, he says, “accepts the perverse view… that our rights come not from God, but from the government.”

Progressivism’s legal belligerence towards Christianity represents a fundamental conflict of worldviews that goes far beyond healthcare. The modern left’s narrative posits government as, in economist Murray Rothbard’s words, a “quasi-divine, selfless, Santa Claus organization.” My Christianity prevents me from seeing government this way. In my view, the place in which the left sets government is already occupied by a transcendent God – and can never be reached by limited human beings.

Napolitano further notes that “if the government is the source of freedom, then the government can restrict it. This is, of course, the opposite view from that of Judeo-Christian values.”

The Judge’s statement is firmly rooted in scripture. A number of biblical verses, including 1 Samuel 8 and Judges 9:8-15, explicitly warn Christians not to substitute the government for God – and to be on guard against the evil people who will invariably seek government power.

Caring for the Poor

Much attention has been paid to an order of Roman Catholic nuns, the Little Sisters of the Poor, who have objected to ObamaCare’s requirement that they finance birth control. The Little Sisters, Napolitano points out, “operate nursing homes for those who cannot afford them.”

Napolitano here highlights a deep irony. The Obama Administration is not only suppressing the religious freedom of the Little Sisters, but doing so in the name of a cause to which the Little Sisters have already dedicated their very lives: helping the less fortunate.

The Little Sisters are not alone. A five-year, demographically controlled study by David Campbell and Robert Putnam found that, in general, Americans who regularly attend worship services volunteer for the poor and elderly more than their less devout peers. The researchers reported that “Forty percent of worship-attending Americans volunteer regularly to help the poor and elderly, compared with 15% of Americans who never attend services. Frequent-attenders are also more likely than the never-attenders to volunteer for school and youth programs (36% vs. 15%), a neighborhood or civic group (26% vs. 13%), and for health care (21% vs. 13%).”

If government-run healthcare helps anyone, it will be doing with the violence of government what believers like the Little Sisters currently do with love and sincerity. By trampling on religious liberty, the White House is disenfranchising a demographic (Christians) who already do what ObamaCare purports to.

I submit to you that ObamaCare is, at bottom, not motivated not by a desire to help people, but by a desire to increase equality. The two ends are not the same.

Catholic Doctrine

G.K. Chesterton

Of course, one does not need to be religious to be charitable.

Likewise, one does not need to be a Christian to oppose government power. If religious liberty were saved tomorrow, it would not be by religious libertarians alone; that’s why it is imperative that religious and secular libertarians form a coalition.

Groups who disagree on how life should be lived can nonetheless fight together for our right to decide how to live it.

Yet this coalition must be bound, if not by a fundamental agreement, by empathy. It’s important for those who would stand by the Little Sisters to have some notion of why these women are willing to resist the most powerful people on Earth.

I hope that many libertarians, of many worldviews, will appreciate the beautiful, life-affirming doctrine at the heart of Catholic opposition to birth control. The Vatican II document “Fostering the Nobility of Marriage and the family” reads “The God Himself Who said, ‘it is not good for man to be alone’ (Gen. 2:18 ) and ‘Who made man from the beginning male and female’ (Matt. 19:4), wishing to share with man a certain special participation in His own creative work, blessed male and female, saying: ‘Increase and multiply.’” It concludes that parents “should realize that they are thereby cooperators with the love of God the Creator, and are, so to speak, the interpreters of that love.”

Though he lived before Vatican II, the late Catholic apologist G.K. Chesterton would likely affirm this document today.

Chesterton valued liberty as surely as he valued life. He wrote “The free man owns himself. He can damage himself with either eating or drinking; he can ruin himself with gambling. If he does he is certainly a damn fool, and he might possibly be a damned soul; but if he may not, he is not a free man any more than a dog.”

I think that’s a sentiment we can all unite behind.

Follow TLR on Google+

Related Posts:

• Why Christians Make Great Libertarians
• “If you like your privacy you can keep it.” Rand
• Obama’s NSA Reforms: Lipstick on a Pig
• Judge Napolitano: Pope Francis should be saving souls, not…
• Why is Bill O’Reilly Calling For a Higher Minimum Wage?…

Follow us: @LibRepublic on Twitter | LibertarianRepublic on Facebook

http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/ch...#axzz2qgreM7Oh

The Little Sisters of the Poor will fight to preserve religious freedom

By Los Angeles Times January 20, 2014 12:20 pm

People recognized St. Jeanne Jugan by the begging basket she carried while walking down the roads of Brittany, in northwest France, in the late 18th and early 19th centuries.
Going from door to door, Jugan would ask people for money, gifts -- whatever they could spare for the elderly poor.
Nearly 175 years later, nuns from the religious order Jugan founded, the Little Sisters of the Poor, can still be seen in public, collecting donations to support their work. Unlike some nuns who wear casual clothing these days, the Little Sisters dress in traditional garb, in all white or black habits with gray veils.
Except for their soliciting of donations, the members of the "begging order," as it's sometimes known, have largely stayed out of the spotlight. But that changed in September when the order became one of the plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed against the so-called contraceptive mandate of the Affordable Care Act, placing them at the center of a debate over healthcare and religious freedom.
The nonprofit gained even more public attention when U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor granted a last-minute temporary injunction Dec. 31, giving the sisters a short reprieve from the requirement.
The sisters, who are among 45 religious groups fighting the legislation, take issue with an element of the law that requires all employers -- regardless of religious affiliation -- to provide insurance coverage for contraception to workers. For the sisters, that would include employees at 29 homes they operate for the elderly in cities across the United States, including Los Angeles, Chicago and Baltimore.
The order's "entire reason for being is to serve the poor and elderly," said Robert Destro, a professor of law at the Catholic University of America.
So why join a widely watched legal battle?
"They didn't think they had any other choice," said Daniel Blomberg, senior counsel at the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, a nonprofit public-interest law firm dedicated to protecting the free expression of religious traditions. The Little Sisters approached the Becket Fund about possible legal action, and the firm filed suit on behalf of the order's home in Denver, which has 60 employees who are not nuns.
Blomberg said the sisters had two options: Provide coverage for contraception to their employees, in violation of their Roman Catholic beliefs, or pay hefty tax fines for failing to comply with the law.
The Obama administration offered church-related organizations, including the Little Sisters, an accommodation, allowing them to opt out of the mandate if they signed a self-certification form.
The compromise would mean the sisters would not have to provide contraceptive coverage themselves, but in many cases their workers would be able to get birth control from their insurance carriers.
Some Catholic groups accepted that compromise, but many, including the Little Sisters, did not.
"The mandate violates our religious freedoms," said Mother Loraine Marie Clare Maguire, provincial superior of the congregation's Baltimore province.
The Little Sisters, who came to the U.S. in 1868, have 10 to 13 sisters in each home. They serve more than 13,000 elderly poor people in 31 countries around the world, said Sister Constance Carolyn Veit, the order's spokeswoman.
The Little Sisters do not belong to the Leadership Conference of Women Religious, the umbrella group for most American nuns censured by the Vatican for promoting what it called "radical feminist themes." Instead, the Little Sisters belong to the Council on Major Superiors of Women Religious, and with 300 members in the U.S. are considered one of the larger religious communities in the organization.
In addition to vows of chastity, poverty and obedience, the Little Sisters take a vow of hospitality. Admission to their homes is open to low-income people who are at least 60 years old, regardless of religion. Homes vary in size and offer several levels of care, including nursing homes and residential or assisted living.
The Little Sisters also do not build an endowment, just as their founder Jugan ordered. The strong, family spirit the sisters share with the elderly poor and their tradition of begging distinguishes them as an order, Veit said. The nuns put faith in St. Joseph, their patron saint, and their motto: "If God is with us, it will be accomplished."
"A lot of people look at poor elderly as if they don't matter," Blomberg said. "The sisters push back against that and make it very clear that these lives do matter. They are committed to honoring life at its very end."
Pope Benedict XVI addressed the importance of their mission while visiting the Little Sisters in London in September 2010.
"I come to you as a brother who knows well the joys and struggles that come with age," he said, according to the order's website. "As advances in medicine and other factors lead to increased longevity, it is important to recognize the presence of growing numbers of older people as a blessing for society."
St. Jugan, who was canonized by Benedict in 2009, often said that "making the elderly happy -- that is everything."
Maguire says she hopes the sisters can continue channeling their founder for at least another 175 years.
"We take care of the elderly poor," she said. "That's really our main concern and objective: to live that mission."
___
(c)2014 the Los Angeles Times
Visit the Los Angeles Times at www.latimes.com
Distributed by MCT Information Services
----
A service of YellowBrix, Inc.

http://www.gopusa.com/news/2014/01/2.../?subscriber=1