Thread: IN Court NO Right Resist Illegal Police Entry To Your Home

Magna Carta inoperative

May 14, 2011

IN court says no right to resist illegal police entry to your home

Rick Moran
23 Comments

If a SWAT team mistakenly busts into your home in the middle of the night, you have no right to protect yourself or your family.

This, according to an Indiana court who, it is pointed out, has overturned hundreds of years of common law: http://www.nwitimes.com/news/local/govt ... 29697.html

Overturning a common law dating back to the English Magna Carta of 1215, the Indiana Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Hoosiers have no right to resist unlawful police entry into their homes.
In a 3-2 decision, Justice Steven David writing for the court said if a police officer wants to enter a home for any reason or no reason at all, a homeowner cannot do anything to block the officer's entry.

"We believe ... a right to resist an unlawful police entry into a home is against public policy and is incompatible with modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence," David said. "We also find that allowing resistance unnecessarily escalates the level of violence and therefore the risk of injuries to all parties involved without preventing the arrest."

David said a person arrested following an unlawful entry by police still can be released on bail and has plenty of opportunities to protest the illegal entry through the court system.

The court's decision stems from a Vanderburgh County case in which police were called to investigate a husband and wife arguing outside their apartment.

When the couple went back inside their apartment, the husband told police they were not needed and blocked the doorway so they could not enter. When an officer entered anyway, the husband shoved the officer against a wall. A second officer then used a stun gun on the husband and arrested him.

The gradual devolution of property rights continues, spurred on by ridiculous notions like this:

Professor Ivan Bodensteiner, of Valparaiso University School of Law, said the court's decision is consistent with the idea of preventing violence.
"It's not surprising that they would say there's no right to beat the hell out of the officer," Bodensteiner said. "(The court is saying) we would rather opt on the side of saying if the police act wrongfully in entering your house your remedy is under law, to bring a civil action against the officer."

The dissenting judge spells out the consequences:

"In my view the majority sweeps with far too broad a brush by essentially telling Indiana citizens that government agents may now enter their homes illegally -- that is, without the necessity of a warrant, consent or exigent circumstances," Rucker said. "I disagree."

What he said.

Hopefully, wiser judicial heads will prevail on appeal. In the meantime, we are becoming more and more like a banana republic every day it seems.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/201 ... _resi.html

I think I already saw this posted somewhere else on ALIPAC.

That is wrong.