Thread: Republican responce to the State of the Union

January 25, 2011

Ryan, Bachmann Release Excerpts of State of the Union Responses
Fire it up


Twitter AP

Rep. Paul Ryan [1], R-Wis., will give the Republican response to the president's State of the Union Address Tuesday night. His office released these excerpts from Ryan's statement:

"Americans are skeptical of both political parties, and that skepticism is justified - especially when it comes to spending. So hold all of us accountable. In this very room, the House will produce, debate, and advance a budget. Last year - in an unprecedented failure- Congress chose not to pass, or even propose a budget. The spending spree continued unchecked. We owe you a better choice and a different vision. Our forthcoming budget is our obligation to you - to show you how we intend to do things differently ... how we will cut spending to get the debt down... help create jobs and prosperity ... and reform government programs."

Rep. Michele Bachmann [2], R-Minn., will also give a response on behalf of the Tea Party [3] Express. Bachmann as well the Republican leadership say that Ryan's response is the official Republican response.

Bachmann's office released these excerpts from her statement:

"For two years President Obama made promises... He claimed that he would find solutions to fix our economy and help create jobs.

"Well, here are a few suggestions:

"The President could stop the EPA from imposing a job-destroying cap-and-trade system.

"The President could agree with House Republicans and commit himself to signing a Balanced Budget Amendment.

"The President could also agree to an all-of-the-above energy policy [4] whereby we increase American energy production, reduce our dependence on foreign oil, reduce the price of gas at the pump, and create good-paying jobs in the U.S.

"The President could turn back some of the 132 regulations put in place in the last two years that each have an impact of $100-million or more on our economy."

"Thanks to all of you, there's reason to hope that real spending cuts are coming. Last November many of you went to the polls and voted out big-spending politicians and you put in their place men and women who have come to Washington with a commitment to follow the Constitution and cut the size of government. And I believe that we are in the early days of a history-making turn here in the House of Representatives.

"Last week we voted to repeal ObamaCare, and each day going forward, we must work hard to dismantle the massive government expansion that has happened over the past two years."

http://nation.foxnews.com/michele-bachm ... -responses

CNN defends airing Bachmann's personal SOTU response - fails

by Barbara Morrill
Tue Jan 25, 2011 at 04:32:04 PM PST

Facing criticism from both Democrats and Republicans over their decision to air Rep. Michele Bachmann's unofficial GOP response to President Obama's State of the Union address, CNN is defending themselves -- and failing miserably:

The Tea Party has become a major force in American politics and within the Republican Party. Hearing the Tea Party's perspective on the State of the Union is something we believe CNN's viewers will be interested in hearing and we are happy to include this perspective as one of many in tonight's coverage.

Of course it has nothing to do with the fact that:

... CNN has a longstanding romance with the Tea Party Express, the PAC that's putting on the Bachmann speech. Later this year, the network and the PAC (and potentially other Tea Party groups) are co-sponsoring a presidential debate between Republican candidates.

... because viewer interest and "perspective" sounds so much more high-minded, and makes it easier to pretend that the tea party is a movement rather than the Republican Party dressed up in tricorn hats.

But as I pointed out earlier, Republicans should be more upset than Democrats at this journalistic malpractice, because after all:

... the last thing the GOP establishment wants is the lunatic fringe that controls their party's agenda to be front and center on the national stage.

Need proof? Fox News isn't carrying it.

::

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2011/ ... ponsefails

Republican Ryan vows to cut spending and debt

By Thomas Ferraro and Donna Smith

WASHINGTON | Tue Jan 25, 2011 8:37pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Americans are justifiably skeptical of members of both political parties, particularly when it comes to spending, U.S. House of Representatives Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan said on Tuesday.

In remarks prepared for delivery as the official Republican response to President Barack Obama's State of the Union Address, Ryan vowed to draft a budget that shows his party intends to "do things differently" and cut federal spending, reduce the U.S. debt and create jobs.
"Americans are skeptical of both political parties, and that skepticism is justified -- especially when it comes to spending," Ryan said in excerpts of his remarks released by congressional Republican leaders.
Obama planned to focus on fiscal matters in his speech, and so did Ryan, 40, a rising young star in the Republican Party.
Ryan said that American voters, who gave Republicans control of the House in the November election, have become fed up with what they see as excessive federal spending and a mounting federal debt.
"Last year -- in an unprecedented failure -- Congress chose not to pass, or even propose a budget," Ryan said. "The spending spree continued unchecked.
"We owe you a better choice and a different vision," Ryan said.
With the federal debt topping $14 trillion and Congress and the White House still seeking common ground on how to reduce it, Ryan said. "Our nation is approaching a tipping point."
"We are at a moment, where if government's growth is left unchecked and unchallenged, America's best century will be considered our past century," Ryan said in a call for action.
Underscoring some division within Republican ranks over how deep to cut, Ryan wasn't the only party member to ready to deliver a nationally broadcast response to Obama's speech.
So was Representative Michele Bachmann, a leading figure in the anti-establishment Tea Party movement that helped Republicans win the House from Obama's Democrats in last year's election.
While House Republican leaders aim to impose about $60 billion in cuts within months, Bachmann is among those pushing for at least $100 billion, which was what Republicans vowed during last year's campaign before backing off some.
Bachmann agreed to deliver a response to Obama at the request of the Tea Party Express, one of the most aggressive groups in the Tea Party movement.
In prepared remarks, Bachmann ripped into Obama, saying the president rejected pleas to curb spending during his first two years in office.
"Instead of cutting, we saw an unprecedented explosion of government spending and debt ... unlike anything we have seen in the history of our country," said Bachmann, head of the Congressional Tea Party Caucus.

"For two years President Obama made promises.... He claimed that he would find solutions to fix our economy and help create jobs," Bachmann said.
Bachmann offered Obama a few "suggestions," including agreeing with Republicans to a proposed amendment to the U.S. Constitution to require a balanced federal budget.
(Editing by Eric Walsh)

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE70O7KI20110126

Full text: GOP's prepared response to Obama's State of the Union speech

Posted 3m ago

Good evening. I'm Congressman Paul Ryan from Janesville, Wisconsin– and Chairman here at the House Budget Committee.

President Obama just addressed a Congressional chamber filled with many new faces. One face we did not see tonight was that of our friend and colleague, Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords of Arizona. We all miss Gabby and her cheerful spirit; and we are praying for her return to the House Chamber.

Earlier this month, President Obama spoke movingly at a memorial event for the six people who died on that violent morning in Tucson. Still, there are no words that can lift the sorrow that now engulfs the families and friends of the fallen.

What we can do is assure them that the nation is praying for them; that, in the words of the Psalmist, the Lord heals the broken hearted and binds up their wounds; and that over time grace will replace grief.

As Gabby continues to make encouraging progress, we must keep her and the others in our thoughts as we attend to the work now before us.


THE OVAL: GOP's Ryan to say 'spending spree' is over

Tonight, the President focused a lot of attention on our economy in general – and on our deficit and debt in particular.

He was right to do so, and some of his words were reassuring. As Chairman of the House Budget Committee, I assure you that we want to work with the President to restrain federal spending.

In one of our first acts in the new majority, House Republicans voted to cut Congress's own budget. And just today, the House voted to restore the spending discipline that Washington sorely needs.

The reason is simple.

A few years ago, reducing spending was important. Today, it's imperative. Here's why.

We face a crushing burden of debt. The debt will soon eclipse our entire economy, and grow to catastrophic levels in the years ahead.

On this current path, when my three children – who are now 6, 7, and 8 years old – are raising their own children, the Federal government will double in size, and so will the taxes they pay.

No economy can sustain such high levels of debt and taxation. The next generation will inherit a stagnant economy and a diminished country.

Frankly, it's one of my greatest concerns as a parent – and I know many of you feel the same way.

Our debt is the product of acts by many presidents and many Congresses over many years. No one person or party is responsible for it.

There is no doubt the President came into office facing a severe fiscal and economic situation.

Unfortunately, instead of restoring the fundamentals of economic growth, he engaged in a stimulus spending spree that not only failed to deliver on its promise to create jobs, but also plunged us even deeper into debt.

The facts are clear: Since taking office, President Obama has signed into law spending increases of nearly 25% for domestic government agencies – an 84% increase when you include the failed stimulus.

All of this new government spending was sold as "investment." Yet after two years, the unemployment rate remains above 9% and government has added over $3 trillion to our debt.

Then the President and his party made matters even worse, by creating a new open-ended health care entitlement.

What we already know about the President's health care law is this: Costs are going up, premiums are rising, and millions of people will lose the coverage they currently have. Job creation is being stifled by all of its taxes, penalties, mandates and fees.

Businesses and unions from around the country are asking the Obama Administration for waivers from the mandates. Washington should not be in the business of picking winners and losers. The President mentioned the need for regulatory reform to ease the burden on American businesses. We agree – and we think his health care law would be a great place to start.

Last week, House Republicans voted for a full repeal of this law, as we pledged to do, and we will work to replace it with fiscally responsible, patient-centered reforms that actually reduce costs and expand coverage.

Health care spending is driving the explosive growth of our debt. And the President's law is accelerating our country toward bankruptcy.

Our debt is out of control. What was a fiscal challenge is now a fiscal crisis.

We cannot deny it; instead we must, as Americans, confront it responsibly.

And that is exactly what Republicans pledge to do.

Americans are skeptical of both political parties, and that skepticism is justified – especially when it comes to spending. So hold all of us accountable.

In this very room, the House will produce, debate, and advance a budget. Last year – in an unprecedented failure– Congress chose not to pass, or even propose a budget. The spending spree continued unchecked.

We owe you a better choice and a different vision.

Our forthcoming budget is our obligation to you – to show you how we intend to do things differently … how we will cut spending to get the debt down… help create jobs and prosperity … and reform government programs. If we act soon, and if we act responsibly, people in and near retirement will be protected.

These budget debates are not just about the programs of government; they're also about the purpose of government.

So I'd like to share with you the principles that guide us. They are anchored in the wisdom of the founders; in the spirit of the Declaration of Independence; and in the words of the American Constitution.

They have to do with the importance of limited government; and with the blessing of self-government.

We believe government's role is both vital and limited – to defend the nation from attack and provide for the common defense … to secure our borders… to protect innocent life… to uphold our laws and Constitutional rights … to ensure domestic tranquility and equal opportunity … and to help provide a safety net for those who cannot provide for themselves.

We believe that the government has an important role to create the conditions that promote entrepreneurship, upward mobility, and individual responsibility.

We believe, as our founders did, that "the pursuit of happiness" depends upon individual liberty; and individual liberty requires limited government.

Limited government also means effective government. When government takes on too many tasks, it usually doesn't do any of them very well. It's no coincidence that trust in government is at an all-time low now that the size of government is at an all-time high.

The President and the Democratic Leadership have shown, by their actions, that they believe government needs to increase its size and its reach, its price tag and its power.

Whether sold as "stimulus" or repackaged as "investment," their actions show they want a federal government that controls too much; taxes too much; and spends too much in order to do too much.

And during the last two years, that is exactly what we have gotten – along with record deficits and debt – to the point where the President is now urging Congress to increase the debt limit.

We believe the days of business as usual must come to an end. We hold to a couple of simple convictions: Endless borrowing is not a strategy; spending cuts have to come first.

Our nation is approaching a tipping point.

We are at a moment, where if government's growth is left unchecked and unchallenged, America's best century will be considered our past century. This is a future in which we will transform our social safety net into a hammock, which lulls able-bodied people into lives of complacency and dependency.

Depending on bureaucracy to foster innovation, competitiveness, and wise consumer choices has never worked – and it won't work now.

We need to chart a new course.

Speaking candidly, as one citizen to another: We still have time… but not much time. If we continue down our current path, we know what our future will be.

Just take a look at what's happening to Greece, Ireland, the United Kingdom and other nations in Europe. They didn't act soon enough; and now their governments have been forced to impose painful austerity measures: large benefit cuts to seniors and huge tax increases on everybody.

Their day of reckoning has arrived. Ours is around the corner. That is why we must act now.

Some people will back away from this challenge. But I see this challenge as an opportunity to rebuild what Lincoln called the "central ideas" of the Republic.

We believe a renewed commitment to limited government will unshackle our economy and create millions of new jobs and opportunities for all people, of every background, to succeed and prosper. Under this approach, the spirit of initiative – not political clout – determines who succeeds.

Millions of families have fallen on hard times not because of our ideals of free enterprise – but because our leaders failed to live up to those ideals; because of poor decisions made in Washington and Wall Street that caused a financial crisis, squandered our savings, broke our trust, and crippled our economy.

Today, a similar kind of irresponsibility threatens not only our livelihoods but our way of life.

We need to reclaim our American system of limited government, low taxes, reasonable regulations, and sound money, which has blessed us with unprecedented prosperity. And it has done more to help the poor than any other economic system ever designed. That's the real secret to job creation – not borrowing and spending more money in Washington.

Limited government and free enterprise have helped make America the greatest nation on earth.

These are not easy times, but America is an exceptional nation. In all the chapters of human history, there has never been anything quite like America. The American story has been cherished, advanced, and defended over the centuries.

And it now falls to this generation to pass on to our children a nation that is stronger, more vibrant, more decent, and better than the one we inherited.

Thank you and good night.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington ... nion_N.htm

I see nothing wrong with CNN airing Bachmann's "response". I think everyone who represents a large group of views who wants to respond should have the air time to do so.

Originally Posted by Judy

I see nothing wrong with CNN airing Bachmann's "response". I think everyone who represents a large group of views who wants to respond should have the air time to do so.

I agree, we are seeing the beginning of a new party although I think the Republican Party needs to embrace the Tea party and dump Mclaim and Lindsy Grahm

'Bama didn't even mention the 27 million Americans who are either unemployed or involuntarily underemployed. The Republican response doesn't say how they plan to put Americans back to work.

"Limited government" is a valid principle, but if Repubs don't have a jobs program, 'Bama will out-speechify the Rupublican nominee.

It looks as if the leadership of both major parties doesn't have a clue about how to put Americans back to work. Lamar Smith said in an interview that Americans could do most of the jobs being done by illegals. Where was any hint of this in the Repubs' response?