Obama betrays 'common values' to coddle sodomites

Posted: January 30, 2010
1:00 am Eastern
© 2010

Toward the end of his State of the Union address, President Obama said:

"Abroad, America's greatest source of strength has always been our ideals. Same is true at home. … If you adhere to our common values, you should be treated no different than anyone else."

In the very next paragraph following his salute to what he defined as "our common values," the president announced his adherence to what is surely not a common value in the United States. For he said: "This year, I will work with Congress and our military to finally repeal the law that denies gay Americans the right to serve the country they love because of who they are."

That statement is outrageously false. For under the presently existing armed forces regulation of "Don't ask, don't tell," homosexuals can be enlisted and remain in the service provided (1) they do not advertise their sexual orientation and (2) they never engage in it in barracks, foxholes, aboard ship or in submarines.

How could this president salute the ideal of adhering to our common values by defying the strong advice of more than 1,100 of our armed forces' generals and admirals?

Don't miss David Kupelian's culture-war classic, "The Marketing of Evil: How Radicals, Elitists, and Pseudo-Experts Sell Us Corruption Disguised as Freedom"

These leaders, of armed forces in which Barack Obama has never served – until he became our civilian commander in chief – are well aware of the disastrous effect of subjecting entire barracks full of young male recruits to the command (including after hours) of Sodom's sergeants, as well as officers who are self-identified homosexual militants.

The effect would be as sexually disastrous as assigning female trainees to the same barracks rooms, latrines and shower rooms as large numbers of heterosexual males. It would cause an enormous drop in recruiting. Moreover, how can Obama rationally contend that our "common values" should allow the nation's largest spreader of AIDS and syphilis to come into armed forces barracks and ships without equal reception of all other alternative sexual orientations who want to enlist?

Should our armed forces be ordered to open their ranks to practicing polygamists and polyandrists? If not, why not?

Surely these sexual orientations have nothing of the AIDS and syphilis rates of homosexuality.

Neither do other sexual orientations, including coprophiliacs, practitioners of incest, necrophiliacs, pedophiles, sado-masochists, urophiliacs and zoophiliacs (bestiality), among the many other alternative sexual orientations.

But Obama has not (yet) advocated enlistment of any of these other organizations – only the enlistment of the nation's largest AIDS- and syphilis-spreaders.

And how will Obama's pledge to open-the-armed-forces-to-self-identified-homosexuals affect the electorate which goes to the polls on Nov. 2, just a little more than nine months from now?

Will this Obama sodomist-into-the-service-pitch help re-elect:

* Majority Leader Harry Reid, who is significantly behind two rival candidates in Nevada?

* Arlen Specter, who is fighting for his political life in Pennsylvania?

* Barbara Boxer in California, a majority of whose voters passed Proposition 8, which opposed same-sex marriage?

* Blanche Lincoln, in Arkansas, who faces a comparatively unknown homosexual militant in the primary; followed by one of eight Republican rivals in the general election?

* Patty Murray of Washington state, who has six GOP candidates running against her?

The situation is so grim that Democrat Sens. Chris Dodd, Roland Burris and Byron Dorgan have declined to run for re-election. In Delaware, the vice president's son, state Attorney General Beau Biden, also declined to run – even for his father's seat.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=123585