This is PDF so I can't copy/paste, but everyone you know needs to read this paper.
http://www.tdbimg.com/files/2009/04/30/ ... 935473.pdf
Printable View
This is PDF so I can't copy/paste, but everyone you know needs to read this paper.
http://www.tdbimg.com/files/2009/04/30/ ... 935473.pdf
I will be sure to read Cayla but first wanted to say something about being unable to copy/paste PDF format.
There is a way it can be done.....I believe the process involves sending it to something like a clip board, note book, etc. Once it's there, then it can be copied and pasted.
I'm not certain of all the ins and outs but I know my kids have done this and they tell me there's all kinds of instructions for accomplishing it floating around out there.
Wow, I just skimmed it. Christians are people who say all white people of non-Jewish descent are God's chosen people. I've been Christian my whole life and NEVER has that been the defination.
Got to get a load of the anti-illegal immigration defination. Anti- anything that has to do with Mexicans south of the border.
Hey, I got a defination for them. Complete nut jobs![/quote]
Plus, love the fact it's private. Hey you can change anything and it's fine and no reason to tell anyone that they've changed the defination of everything.
Wow.....seems like EVERYONE has been labeled as a potential threat and that includes La Raza and all similar advocacy groups by definition.
(U) direct action (U//FOUO) Lawful or unlawful acts of civil disobedience
ranging from protests to property destruction or acts of
violence. This term is most often used by single-issue or
anarchist extremists to describe their activities.
(U) ethnic-based
extremism
(U//FOUO) A movement of groups or individuals who are
drawn together and form extremist beliefs based on their
ethnic or cultural background. Members have advocated or
engaged in criminal activity and have plotted acts of violence
and terrorism in an attempt to advance their extremist goals.
(U) leftwing
extremism
(U//FOUO) A movement of groups or individuals that
embraces anticapitalist, Communist, or Socialist doctrines
and seeks to bring about change through violent revolution
rather than through established political processes. The term
also refers to leftwing, single-issue extremist movements that
are dedicated to causes such as environmentalism, opposition
to war, and the rights of animals.
(U) Mexican
separatism
(U//FOUO) A movement of groups or individuals of
Mexican descent who advocate the secession of southwestern
U.S. states (all or part of Arizona, California, New Mexico,
and Texas) to join with Mexico through armed struggle.
Members do not recognize the legitimacy of these U.S. states,
including the U.S. Government’s original acquisition of these
territories.
(U) primary targeting (U//FOUO) Plans or attacks directed by extremists against
parties that are the focus of an organized campaign.
(U) radicalization (U//FOUO) The process by which an individual adopts an
extremist belief system leading to his or her willingness to
advocate or bring about political, religious, economic, or
social change through the use of force, violence, or
ideologically motivated criminal activity.
OOPS!! Hit the wrong button 8O Good God, there are just some days when my family should NOT let me out of the attic...... :lol:
Continuing below:
This is the one that astounded me
So if you think like the founders of this country you're labeled an extremist???Quote:
patriot movement (U//FOUO) A term used by rightwing extremists to link their
beliefs to those commonly associated with the American
Revolution. The patriot movement primarily comprises
violent antigovernment groups such as militias and sovereign
citizens.
(also: Christian patriots, patriot group, Constitutionalists,
Constitutionist)
(U) secondary
targeting
(U//FOUO) Plans or attacks directed against parties
(secondary targets) that provide direct financial, logistic, or
physical support to the primary target of an organized
campaign, with the goal of coercing those parties to end their
engagement with a primary target. Secondary targets can
include customers of or suppliers to a primary target or
employees of a primary target organization.
(U) single-issue
extremist groups
(U//FOUO) Groups or individuals who focus on a single
issue or cause—such as animal rights, environmental or
anti-abortion extremism—and often employ criminal acts.
Group members may be associated with more than one issue.
(also: special interest extremists)
(U) tertiary targeting (U//FOUO) Plans or attacks against parties with indirect
links to the primary target of an organized campaign.
Tertiary targets can include employees, customers, investors,
and other participants in a company (the secondary target)
that does business with or provides support services to the
primary target; or parties who provide direct financial,
logistic, or physical support to the secondary target.
(U) underground (U//FOUO) A term used to describe clandestine extremist
groups, individuals, or their activities.
It actually seems like there is more here which describes the actions, activities, tactics, and agendas of the pro-illegal advocacy, reconquistas, their political plants, etc. than there is which applies to the average American citizen who is politically involved.
I also find it somewhat encouraging.....yeah, I know, hard to believe.....that in describing what they call "extremists" they include, in the definition, the terminology "and who have been
known to advocate or engage in criminal activity and plot acts
of violence and terrorism to advance their extremist goals"
That "AND" is very important within the context and what follows does not describe the majority of those of us who are politically involved.
They say that........the reformers and radicals of any government get the bad name when they come out. They act like, out of no-where and for no good reason, all these people rebel. People don't do things for no reason, they don't revolt because there's nothing better to do. There's that missing piece in the middle.
Call me crazy, but I wonder what the real issues are with the terriorists? Heck fire, we're hand and glove compared to them and called the same.....but I'd never advocate mass suicide or all the other insanity. I mean where's the line? I looked at the anti-abortion thing. I'm pro-choice, but I don't advocate it as an easy "birth control" method. I drew the line when they were bombing clinics and killing Dr's. I don't believe that is the answer.....but after Obama's ruling, how am I to know it won't switch to a China type atmosphere or DNA clinics where they FORCE women to abortion? Then I might advocate the extreem. When did that line cross from people with a legitament issue to extreem measures? I can empathise with those with the right to die with dignaty, but when does it cross to killing for organs or whatever?
I don't know anyone that is not a Right-Wing Extremists. And I wonder what the plan is to punish Right-Wingers?
"TAG, you're it!", well according to DHS we all are "it" now.
I have sent many people this link, and plan to keep doing this to show people how we have pretty much all become enemies of the government.
To be brutally honest, my own son, who is 15, and very much aware of all of this, is now becoming afraid of his own government, for fear if he has ANY opinion, he will be scrutinized and potentially linked up with something he cannot even imagine. What way is this, to live in fear of our own government? What would posses them to label pretty much ALL Americans, in one way or another, under such general terms, to make us all into extremists?
Have an opinion, well you just might be an extremist.
If someone was never an extremist and was upset enough over the everyday stuff going on, and then read both documents, it could then swing them over to extremism, in Biblical terms, "provoking them to wrath".
This one is for you all, feel free to pass it around via email, it might help get peoples attention to this really sickening subject........:(
YOU MIGHT BE AN EXTREMIST IF......
You want to have more control over your own money
You want to be involved and have more control over your children's education
You believe our borders and ports of entry should be secured
You believe that our Constitution is a real document to adhere to
You go to church and have political opinions
Believe that English is our national language and all business should be done in it
You rally or protest
You boycott businesses for their unfair practices in business and hiring
You own an American flag, and proudly display it
You view your nations heritage as good and believe it needs to be taught as history
You feel our government takes too much in taxes
You feel our government has a spending problem
You no longer ascribe to the two-party system
You believe you have a right to responsible gun ownership
You have the right to live as freely, off of government aid as possible
You believe "private property" means just that, and not public property, subject to eminent domain
You believe in a right to privacy
You are proud of your families heritage
and:
You believe that the government works for you, not you for them.......
WATCH OUT AMERICANS, DHS HAS NOW BEGUN TO GO AFTER YOU!
http://www.tdbimg.com/files/2009/04/30/-hsra-domestic-extremism-lexicon_165213935473.pdf
"Domestic Extremism
Lexicon"
brought to you by DHS, an arm of your own government!
Guess how DHS defines who is a terrorist now?
2nd 'domestic extremism' report includes 'alternative media,' 'tax resisters' in lexicon
http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=96916
Quote:
Originally Posted by kniggit
No. If you think like the founding fathers and are involved with VIOLENT anti-government groups and activites, you are an extremist.
That's what it says. It does not label a patriot an extremist just because they are a patriot.
azwreath, I can agree they do mention violent, but truthfully, we have seen no violence coming out of any of the patriot groups we know of. The only times we are hearing stuff, it is isolated individuals, or apparently mentally ill people, but never linked with anyone, or any group we know of.
It is their attempt to garner support for their crusade from state, county and city police in this. They make the statement to report any and all activity, suspicious or criminal in nature. So we know police already deal with the criminal activity, but now they ask them to report anything "suspicious" to DHS or FBI...fine, but with such a broad brush being used to define people who should be watched, anyone of us could simply be reported for being in a rally, or online group, even if an indirect link was made to one person.
What has happened is just having that wording, lines people who are patriots, up as potential ones in DHS's eyes. No, none have yet done anything wrong, but all it will take is for one person, who had once posted here, or on any other "patriot" groups sites, and we all become "domestic extremists.
Although, you have to realize, once they begin this process, of systematically making broad and generalized statements, they will continue.
Here is a great example of what is being done:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda
On Lou Dobbs tonight it said that DHS has recalled this document also, did I see that right? Anyone else seen mention of them recalling it?
Yes, I did see that. I think with it all being exposed in the media and on the internet, they decided the furry of Americans was more than they bargained for.
I think they realized that Americans do not fall for propaganda, there is more of us, than them.
I don't trust these so called "recalls of the definitions". They are still there, this is still their guidelines, make no mistake about that. NOW it will just be kept "top secret" info.Quote:
Originally Posted by kniggit