Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Super Moderator Newmexican's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Heart of Dixie
    Posts
    36,012

    Farenthold Case Prompts Talk About Sexual Harassment on Capitol Hill By Hannah Hess a

    Farenthold Case Prompts Talk About Sexual Harassment on Capitol Hill

    By Hannah Hess and Rebecca Gale
    Posted at 4:32 p.m. Sept. 29



    Cloakroom buzzed about sexual harassment as the House Ethics Committee announced its next step on Farenthold’s case. (Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call)

    “What do you do if you’re being sexually harassed in your office?” one user asked Monday morning on the anonymous Capitol Hill social-networking app Cloakroom.

    It prompted one person, identifying himself as a 26-year-old male working for a 40-year-old female chief of staff, to share his own situation. “She has slapped my ass, talked about her vibrator, and has asked me sexual questions. I have ignored them but I am thinking about going to the member,” he submitted to the online community, limited to users whose GPS location is within the Capitol complex, or those who register with a staff email address.

    The thread drew 30 responses, ranging from vulgar to stoic. Some advised contacting the appropriate ethics committee to document the details or reaching out to the House Office of Employee Assistance for professional and emotional counseling. One warned the user to accept that reporting the harassment means, “You will need to accept that your career on the Hill will be over.”

    As Cloakroom users talked shop about office sexual harassment, the House Ethics Committeeannounced it would continue its review of sexual harassment allegations against Rep. Blake Farenthold, R-Texas, as civil litigation proceeds in a case brought by his former communications director. The Office of Congressional Ethics on Monday said it did not find substantial reason to believe the congressman sexually harassed his staffer, but the committee said it had not completed its review of the matter. A link to CQ Roll Call’s story in the app drew comparisons to the other case in which the committee addressed the topic.roves Mandatory Sexual Harassment Training to End 'Mad Men-Style Antics'

    In late 2014, the committee chided Rep. Alcee L. Hastings, D-Fla., for unprofessional behavior with female employees of the United States Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, including comments about sex and underwear. But the committee ultimately cleared Hastings of allegations that he made unwanted sexual advances toward a Republican aide on the commission.

    Both the Farenthold and Hastings cases concern allegations against members of Congress; far less attention is given to conflicts between staff members in the same congressional office.

    Even without knowing the facts involved, the staffer wondering about sexual harassment should speak to Office of Compliance. Such conversations and counseling are strictly confidential and will provide a better understanding of what recourse is available. Even a sympathetic member of Congress may not be in the ideal position to police their interoffice dynamics. The Office of Compliance is the right place to start. If and when the conversation escalates, there will be a trained professional present to ensure a better outcome for everyone involved.

    Unfortunately, just as in any other workplace, claims of discrimination and harassment are present on Capitol Hill. Staffers are protected from such discrimination under the Congressional Accountability Act. Several congressional agencies — such as the Library of Congress — are exempted from parts of the CAA and have their own employee complaint and resolution system.

    The Office of Compliance provides confidential counseling to employees — including House and Senate staffers, the office of the Architect of the Capitol and the Capitol Police — and are mandated by the CAA to provide statistical data to Congress annually. Recent data show that claims of discrimination and/or harassment on Capitol Hill have remained relatively constant since 2009.

    Outlets such as Cloakroom (or even Hill Navigator) may be helpful in providing camaraderie and support, but neither is a substitute for the professional expertise within the Office of Compliance. As one Cloakroom commenter pointed out, the member of Congress could side with the chief of staff, leaving the accusing staffer with little recourse. Such predicaments, while we hope they are rare, are the precise reason why such professional and confidential counseling is needed. Stat.
    Staffers seeking more information or wishing to report a complaint can contact the Office of Compliance at (202) 724-9250 or visit the website. All inquiries are strictly confidential.

    http://www3.blogs.rollcall.com/hill-...-capitol-hill/

  2. #2
    Super Moderator Newmexican's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Heart of Dixie
    Posts
    36,012
    House Ethics Chides Hastings for Talking Sex, Underwear With Aide

    By Hannah HessPosted at 9:26 p.m. on
    Dec. 11, 2014

    House Ethics Committee cleared Hastings, left, of sexual harassment. (Tom Williams/Roll Call File Photo)

    The House Ethics Committee cleared Rep. Alcee Hastings of a sexual harassment case in the waning hours of the 113th Congress, but chided the Florida Democrat for unprofessional behavior with a female employee of the United States Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe.

    Two comments Hastings admitted to making during a 2008 trip to Vienna — one about not being able to sleep after sex, and another about female members of Congress wearing the same underwear all day — were deemed inappropriate. However, like a federal judge did in 2012, the Ethics Committee is letting Hastings off the hook.

    After interviewing four witnesses, the committee said it did not find substantial reason to believe allegations by Winsome Packer, a Republican aide on the commission, regarding the lawmaker making unwelcome sexual advances.

    “While the conduct proven in this case does not constitute misconduct violating the standards under the Committee’s jurisdiction, it is far from perfectly professional,” the 17-page report states. “The Committee advises Members and other in a supervisory role to scrupulously avoid even the impression of a workplace tainted by sexism.”

    Hastings’ office did not respond to request for comment.

    http://www3.blogs.rollcall.com/hill-...ear-with-aide/

Similar Threads

  1. McCain Challenges DOJ’s Redefinition of Sexual Harassment
    By Newmexican in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-01-2013, 11:19 AM
  2. Capitol Hill Hypocrites
    By Newmexican in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-10-2013, 12:10 PM
  3. Sanitary Towel Prompts TSA To Grope Sexual Assault Victim
    By AirborneSapper7 in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-26-2010, 09:55 PM
  4. Judge tosses UN employee's sexual harassment suit
    By butterbean in forum Other Topics News and Issues
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-30-2008, 09:27 PM
  5. Glenview carwash hit with U.S. suit for sexual harassment
    By Brian503a in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-28-2005, 07:11 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •