Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member FedUpinFarmersBranch's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    9,603

    Ca proposal would limit documented imm. medicaid benefits

    California Proposal Would Limit Documented Immigrants' Medicaid Benefits
    Main Category: Medicare / Medicaid / SCHIP
    Article Date: 25 Jun 2008 - 7:00 PDT



    The Ventura County Star on Monday examined California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's (R) proposal to save about $87 million by cutting some health care services to roughly 91,000 immigrants each month. The proposal is part of a plan to reduce the state's $15 billion budget deficit (Kisken, Ventura County Star, 6/23).

    Schwarzenegger's plan would affect preventive health care services through Medi-Cal, the state's Medicaid program, for documented immigrants who have had green cards for fewer than five years (Kaiser Health Disparities Report, 5/21). The changes would give documented immigrants the same Medi-Cal benefits as undocumented immigrants -- coverage for emergency care, prenatal care and nursing home coverage. In addition, the state would save about $42 million by requiring undocumented immigrants to obtain new Medi-Cal cards for emergency services each month, rather than annually (Ventura County Star, 6/23).

    The proposal also would eliminate monthly cash aid to about 10,300 documented immigrants and dental benefits for three million indigent, disabled and elderly residents enrolled in Denti-Cal, a state program that covers diagnostic and preventive dental services (Kaiser Health Disparities Report, 5/21).

    Immigration advocates say the cuts would prevent patients from obtaining preventive care, thus increasing emergency department visits and costs. State Assembly and Senate budget committees have voted against the proposals and other Medi-Cal changes, but state officials say they will continue to push for the cuts.

    Stan Rosenstein, chief deputy director for the California Department of Healthcare Services, said, "Nobody likes to make these cuts. The governor is very clear that he doesn't like this proposal." Rosenstein said, "The issue here ... is with the budget crisis we have. We just don't have the money to help out anymore" (Ventura County Star, 6/23).

    Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.

    © 2008 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member Richard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    5,262
    The changes are actually a good idea the ones for the documented are called vesting which means they have to pay a portion in before they can collect. The ones for the undocumented mean that a lot who would other wise be covered will drop out rather than keep up with the paper work.
    I support enforcement and see its lack as bad for the 3rd World as well. Remittances are now mostly spent on consumption not production assets. Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member redpony353's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    SF
    Posts
    4,883
    THIS IS GOOD. AND I WOULD GO SO FAR AS TO SAY THAT LEGAL IMMIGRANTS SHOULD NOT QUALIFY UNTIL THEY HAVE APPLIED FOR CITIZENSHIP. THIS WOULD PREVENT IMMIGRANTS WHO ARE NOT SERIOUS ABOUT BECOMING AMERICAN FROM USING SERVICES.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Mexifornia
    Posts
    9,455
    I like it except the provision which would provide prenatal care to illegals. They do not need any more incentive to have children and if they choose to do so, they should have to pay for it out of their own pocket.

    Having babies is not a necessity or the type of care that would fall under "emergency care."
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  5. #5
    Senior Member redpony353's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    SF
    Posts
    4,883
    THATS TRUE. HAVING BABIES IS NOT A NECESSITY. IF THEY WANT TO HAVE BABIES, LET THEM FIGURE OUT HOW TO SUPPORT THEM. IF THEY DONT WANT TO TAKE THIS RESPONSIBILITY, LET THEM BUY CONDOMS.
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •