Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member Hylander_1314's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Grant Township Mi
    Posts
    3,473

    The Complete Idiot's Guide to the New World Order

    Here's a link to a video short that has former presidents and high seat officials that use the term New World Order, all the way back to Daddy Bush's first use of it in a National Address.

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 4037774000

    Dick Chenney makes some interesting statement s too in front of the Council on Foreign Relations. Which is nothing more than an "elitests" How Can We Control The World Club.

    Also Daddy Bush saying in the address, That when we succeed, and we will succeed, referring to the NWO.

    And how many people were labelled crackpots and looney tunes for speaking up against this, and how many still are called names for exposing it, even though it's in plain sight, yet treated like it doesn't exist.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Captainron's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    8,279
    Should not a distinction be made between international (North American) joint efforts that promote prosperity and those that seek to alter political sovereignty?
    "Men of low degree are vanity, Men of high degree are a lie. " David
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  3. #3
    Senior Member Hylander_1314's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Grant Township Mi
    Posts
    3,473
    Quote Originally Posted by Captainron
    joint efforts that promote prosperity and those that seek to alter political sovereignty?
    Captainron,

    It is under the idea of "efforts that promote prosperity" that a lot of the NWO agenda has been slipped past the American People. Even David Rockefeller who's a big NWO freak has made many statements about it.

    "We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries." David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral Commission, in an address to a meeting of The Trilateral Commission, in June, 1991

    But the thing is, they would rather it be by consent, but are not adverse to using conquest. So be careful with things that will "guarantee" regional prosperity, like the S.P.P.

    Here's a list of things on the NWO said by people of promminence:

    http://www.svpvril.com/nwo.html

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •