Thread: If you see something say something!!!

CBS Hounds Rand Paul on NSA Spying Scandal: "Why only now raise these concerns"

Norah O'Donnell unsurprisingly conducted a confrontational interview of Senator Rand Paul on Tuesday's CBS This Morning, pummeling the Kentucky Republican for his strong opposition to the National Security Agency's controversial PRISM surveillance program. The anchor played up how "all three branches of government have approved this surveillance" after Paul asserted that "we don't want the government looking at our entire life."

O'Donnell also hammered the senator for supposedly not speaking up earlier about his objections to this electronic monitoring: "There was an invitation in 2011 for...all lawmakers to view this classified report on what was going on....Did you go to that? Why not? Why only now raise these concerns? Congress was briefed on this." [audio available here; video below the jump]

The CBS morning newscast brought on Senator Paul for his take on intelligence contractor Edward Snowden's recent exposure of PRISM's monitoring of tens of millions of Americans. Co-anchor Charlie Rose led the interview by asking the politician, "Do you think he's [Snowden] a hero or a traitor?" When the Republican initially brushed aside the question as "sort of a side point" and stated that the "the Bill of Rights is being violated", Rose repeated his question: "But do you agree with what he did? Whether there is a title to what he did or not, do you agree? Did he do the right thing? Do you support him?"

Anchor Gayle King then asked her sole question during the segment: "The polls show that a lot of Americans seem to be okay with what the government is doing to monitor terrorist threats, even if it invades on privacy. What do you say about that?" Paul replied, in part, by citing how he obtains "most of my daily needs on my Visa card....You can tell whether I go to a psychiatrist; whether I gamble; whether I read conservative magazines; whether I drink; whether I smoke. Your government has no right to this knowledge unless you're accused of a crime; unless there's probable cause."

O'Donnell interrupted her guest mid-answer and began her particularly hostile portion of the interview:
NORAH O'DONNELL: But Senator, there's no proof that the government is monitoring that and using that information. They need a warrant in order to find out where you're shopping and where you're using your credit card.

SEN. RAND PAUL, (R), KENTUCKY: Actually, you're wrong. There's no proof that they're actually doing it, but we do know that third party records – for the past 30, 40 years – have not been sufficiently protected by the Fourth Amendment. We have an exclusion. We say that when you give up your records to a bank, that you're actually giving up your right to privacy. I disagree with those court cases. Some of those court cases need to be reversed. It's not just President Obama. It's President Bush, and all of the presidents – probably for the last four or five presidents. But I think the American people are fed up with it. Now that more and more of our lives are online and digitized, we don't want the government looking at our entire life.

O'DONNELL: Senator, this is an important issue. All three branches of government have approved this surveillance. Obviously, it's carried out by the executive branch. Congress approved it. The courts have approved it. The Congress was briefed 22 times on this PRISM surveillance program between October 2011 and December 2012. Did you attend any of those briefings?

PAUL: Most of these are for the Intelligence Committee, so I wouldn't have been invited. But I would say just because Congress approved it doesn't make it right. Congress has about a 10 percent approval rating, so I think we're often doing things the public doesn't approve of. Last year – last year, we approved of indefinite detention, where an American citizen can be detained without charge or trial for the rest of their life and sent to Guantanamo Bay. I think that's wrong, whether the President signed it or not. It's also hypocritical because the President, when he was a senator, was much more in favor of defending civil liberties.

O'DONNELL: In press accounts, though, today, it says there was an invitation in 2011 for all senators – all lawmakers – to view this classified report on what was going on. You could also ask for a briefing. Did you go to that? Why not? Why only now raise these concerns? Congress was briefed on this.


Video at link below:

Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/matthew...#ixzz2W79EWhQh

Dear kathye,

The vote on the new National ID system may take place as soon as NEXT WEEK.

Already, Barack Obama's snoop-state insiders at the NSA have a massive database full of BILLIONS of emails, phone records, and Internet usage of American citizens.

Imagine all of that information being tied to a tamper-proof, National ID Card with biometric tracking technology that EVERY American is required to own and carry.

It sounds like something out of George Orwell's 1984.

But without your IMMEDIATE action, I'm afraid this Orwellian nightmare will be a harsh reality for every man, woman, and child in America.

kathye, the battle over a National ID Card set to occur in the U.S. Senate next week is one of the most critical fights we've faced in years.

The outcome of this fight could determine whether America turns back toward Liberty - or continues down a slide toward full-scale tyranny.

That's why I hope you'll watch the exclusive video I made about how you can help DEFEAT this dangerous scheme.



Based on the recent revelations that Barack Obama's National Security Agency (NSA) has been snooping through the emails and phone records of millions of Americans each and every day, I'm convinced a National ID Card is the statists' crown jewel.

You see, the NSA has been gathering audio, video, email, photographic, and Internet search usage of Americans who use major providers such as Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Apple, and Yahoo.

Their ultimate goal is an America where federal bureaucrats can track our every move.

And the biometric tracking technology contained within the over 800-page "Immigration Reform" monstrosity would allow them to do just that.

So please take a moment to watch the video I made just for you.

After you watch my video, I need you to make a generous contribution to help Campaign for Liberty alert millions of Americans to this critical fight.

The fate of our fragile Republic could be determined as early as next week.

Please take IMMEDIATE action!

In Liberty,

Ron Paul
Chairman

NSA Infringed Adam Hart-Davis' Photograph For Its PRISM Logo

from the uh-oh dept

Perhaps the NSA has finally met its match: copyright infringement. You may have seen the logo that the NSA is using for the PRISM program (shown here upside down for a reason that will become clear shortly): Well, it turns out that the prism image that they used is being used without permission. The photo was actually taken by Adam Hart-Davis, a well-known BBC presenter. You can see the original below:
Photo by Adam Hart-Davis/DHD Multimedia Gallery As Adam's son, Damon, notes in the link above, the image is free for use via his gallery under some simple terms, including acknowledging the author. Damon jokingly suggests asking the NSA for a small donation, though he worries about any undue attention from the folks at the NSA.

Of course, in a country where copyright laws trump all, perhaps Damon could sue for infringement and seek discovery to find out all the documentation on PRISM.

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/201...ism-logo.shtml

Glenn Beck threatens reveal that will take down "the whole power structure"

• June 12, 2013
• By: Michael Ross

At the top of his radio broadcast today, Glenn Beck promised that, within the next twenty four hours, his The Blaze network will break a story that is going to rock the nation and take down the entire power structure.


Beck refused to elaborate, except to say that an anonymous whistle-blower, whom Beck claims is refusing to come forward out of fear of being killed, had provided him with a one-page document. Beck claimed, however, that "this one document would take down pretty much the whole power structure, pretty much everything."

Gee. Haven't we heard this one before?

It was only two months ago, in the wake of the Boston Marathon bombing, that Glenn Beck promised pretty much the exact same thing. Beck had promised then that he had damning information which he threatened to reveal unless the Obama administration confessed over the weekend.
Of course, there was no such evidence to begin with, so the "big reveal" went as scheduled, only for Beck to present a completely disjointed conspiracy theory, which in turn gradually tied into his conspiracy theory that the Obama administration is conspiring to make him look like a conspiracy theorist.
Beck evidently learned absolutely nothing from having tried this crap once already. In spite of having tried and failed miserably before, he now believes he can convince us that the entire country will be undone with a single page.

"We are going to be greatly divided as a nation n the next ten days," he threatened, "and you are going to witness things in American history that have never been witnessed before."

This ought to be good.

http://www.examiner.com/article/glenn-beck-threatens-reveal-that-will-take-down-the-whole-power-structure

Video at link below

Pelosi preparing fact sheet on how Bush, Obama surveillance programs differ

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Thursday said she’s preparing a fact sheet for Democrats on the differences between President Obama’s and President George W. Bush’s spying activities.

Pelosi called for leaker Edward Snowden to be prosecuted and suggested the Obama-backed programs had stopped terrorist plots, but was quick to contrast the secret surveillance programs of Obama to those under to those under Bush.


She noted that Bush had acted unilaterally while Obama secured an order from a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court, and said the fact sheet would highlight for her members those differences – an indication that the Democrats intend to hammer home the distinctions between the two administrations when it comes to executive oversight. She also reiterated her calls to strengthen a long-dormant government panel, the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, which is designed to ensure that the NSA's surveillances activities don't encroach too far on civil liberties.

“We have to have the balance between liberty and security,” she said.

Pelosi said Snowden, the former defense contractor and CIA employee who outed himself as the source of the leaks, violated sections of the Patriot Act and FISA and should be held accountable.

“On the strength of leaking that [information], yes, that would be a prosecutable offense, and I think that he should be prosecuted,” Pelosi said Thursday at a press conference in the Capitol.

Pelosi joined a growing list of congressional leaders – including Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) – who have condemned Snowden for uncovering several National Security Agency surveillance programs, even as others are calling him a hero.
The secret operations were uncovered last week in a series of articles in The Guardian and The Washington Post. Under one program, the NSA is sweeping up information related to every phone call being place on the Verizon network – an effort supported by an order from the FISA court. A separate NSA program, dubbed PRISM, has been gathering internet data from foreign users.

Pelosi, a former head of the House Intelligence Committee, seemed to defend the PRISM program Thursday, suggesting that it might have helped national security officials gather more information prior to the 911 attacks.


“Certainly it would have improved the chances of doing that. I can't say with certainty that it would have, but it certainly would have improved the chance,” she said. “It did give more opportunity to surveil.” But she also suggested the administration's blanket sweep of domestic phone records was not authorized by current law.
“That is not what either of these bills does, not the Patriot Act nor 702 [of the FISA law],” she said.

The Snowden episode has also sparked questions about the role private contractors play in defending the nation from terrorist attacks.
Pelosi on Thursday wondered how one contractor could singlehandedly make off with enough information to expose the NSA programs.
“How on earth can we have a situation where we are so vulnerable, so exposed … by one person walking out the door with access to so much information?” she added. “That's a question that Congress has to ask.”

She floated the notion of transferring some of the contractor jobs to the government.
“Maybe we should bring more of that in-house,” she said.

“I'm not saying that we shouldn't have some private [contractors] because that can facilitate our security,” she added. “But let's take a measure of how much … intelligence that is in the hands of the private sector.”
This story was updated at 1:32 p.m.

Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/house/30...#ixzz2W7lbEnFd
Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook

Well now if there was any doubts about Snowden, this message from one of the "globalist Puppet Princess" says it all for me!!!

“I'm not saying that we shouldn't have some private [contractors] because that can facilitate our security,” she added. “But let's take a measure of how much … intelligence that is in the hands of the private sector.”

In other words lets keep them stupid and uninformed!!!

Snowden is lying, say chiefs of House Intelligence panel



By Mike Lillis - 06/13/13 02:15 PM ET

The NSA leaker is lying about both his access to information and the scope of the secret surveillance programs he uncovered, the heads of the House Intelligence Committee charged Thursday.
Emerging from a hearing with NSA Director Gen. Keith Alexander, Reps. Mike Rogers (R-Mich.), chairman of the Intelligence Committee, and Dutch Ruppersberger (Md.), the senior Democrat on the panel, said Snowden simply wasn't in the position to access the content of the communications gathered under National Security Agency programs, as he's claimed.








"He was lying," Rogers said. "He clearly has over-inflated his position, he has over-inflated his access and he's even over-inflated what the actually technology of the programs would allow one to do. It's impossible for him to do what he was saying he could do." "He's done tremendous damage to the country where he was born and raised and educated," Ruppersberger said.
Asked how much additional information — including other Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act verdicts — Snowden has in his possession, Rogers said, "No one really knows the answer to that today. I think we will know the answer to that shortly."
"It was clear that he attempted to go places that he was not authorized to go, which should raise questions for everyone," Rogers added.
Rogers said investigators are also trying to determine whether Snowden has any relationship with foreign governments — something national security officials don't know yet, he said.
The NSA leaks have relaunched the post-9/11 debate about how far the government should be allowed to go to protect the country from attacks. Snowden has been hailed as a hero by some liberals, conservatives and civil-liberties groups, who argue the NSA programs are an infringement on constitutionally guaranteed privacy rights.
Snowden's critics, including a growing number of congressional leaders, argue that he broke the law when he leaked the sensitive data through the media. They want him extradited and prosecuted.
"There should be no [question] in anyone's mind that this person is a traitor to the United States of America, and he should be punished," Rogers said.
"Some people are saying that he's a hero. He's broken the law," Ruppersberger said. "We have laws in the United States for whistle-blowers, for people that think there's an injustice being done. All he had to do was raise his hand. ... Under the whistle-blower law, he is protected. Yet he chose to go to China."
The criticism from the Intel leaders took a turn toward the personal Thursday, as Rogers and Ruppersberger questioned how the 29-year-old Snowden, who never graduated from high school, could have risen to a position to access such sensitive information.
"I hope that we don't decide that our national security interests are going to be determined by a high-school dropout who had a whole series of both academic troubles and employment troubles," Rogers said.
"We'd better ask a lot harder questions about who he is and what his motives were, fully, and what access he had to information before we draw the conclusion that this guy was doing something positive."


Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/house/30...#ixzz2W7xFbv3F
Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook


The NASA leaker.......beep beep ....nothing here folks...hmmmm where the heck did I put that mustard!!!!!

22 Nauseating Quotes From Hypocritical Establishment Politicians About The NSA Spying Scandal


By Michael, on June 12th, 2013


Establishment politicians from both major political parties are rushing to defend the NSA and condemn whistleblower Edward Snowden. They are attempting to portray Edward Snowden as a "traitor" and the spooks over at the NSA that are snooping on all of us as "heroes". In fact, many of the exact same politicians that once railed against government spying during the Bush years are now staunchly defending it now that Obama is in the White House. But it isn't just Democrats that are acting shamefully. Large numbers of Republican politicians that love to give speeches about "freedom" and "liberty" are attempting to eviscerate the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The government is not supposed to invade our privacy and investigate us unless there is probable cause to do so. Apparently many of our politicians misunderstood when they read the novel 1984 by George Orwell. It wasn't supposed to be an instruction manual. We should be thanking Edward Snowden for exposing the deep corruption that is eating away at our own government like cancer. Now the American people need to pick up the ball and start demanding answers, because without a doubt we are going to see establishment politicians from both major political parties try to shut this scandal down. Establishment Democrats and establishment Republicans both love the Big Brother surveillance grid that the U.S. government has constructed, and they are both making it abundantly clear that they will defend the NSA to the very end. The following are 22 nauseating quotes from hypocritical establishment politicians that show exactly how they feel about the NSA spying scandal...
#1 Barack Obama: "I think it’s important to understand that you can’t have 100 percent security and then have 100 percent privacy and zero inconvenience. We’re going to have to make some choices as a society."
#2 Barack Obama in 2007: "This Administration also puts forward a false choice between the liberties we cherish and the security we demand… That means no more illegal wire-tapping of American citizens. No more national security letters to spy on citizens who are not suspected of a crime. No more tracking citizens who do nothing more than protest a misguided war. No more ignoring the law when it is inconvenient. That is not who we are. And it is not what is necessary to defeat the terrorists… We will again set an example for the world that the law is not subject to the whims of stubborn rulers, and that justice is not arbitrary."
#3 Speaker Of The House John Boehner on what he thinks about NSA leaker Edward Snowden: "He’s a traitor."
#4 U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham: "I hope we follow Mr. Snowden to the ends of the Earth to bring him to justice."
#5 U.S. Senator Al Franken: "I can assure you, this is not about spying on the American people."
#6 Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid: "For senators to complain that they didn’t know this was happening, we had many, many meetings that have been both classified and unclassified that members have been invited to"
#7 U.S. Senator Mitch McConnell: "Given the scope of these programs, it’s understandable that many would be concerned about issues related to privacy. But what’s difficult to understand is the motivation of somebody who intentionally would seek to warn the nation’s enemies of lawful programs created to protect the American people. And I hope that he is prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law."
#8 U.S. Representative Peter King on why he believes that reporters should be prosecuted for revealing NSA secrets: "There is an obligation both moral, but also legal, I believe, against a reporter disclosing something which would so severely compromise national security."
#9 Director of National Intelligence James Clapper making a joke during an awards ceremony last Friday night: "Some of you expressed surprise that I showed up—so many emails to read!"
#10 Director Of National Intelligence James Clapper about why he lied about NSA spying in front of Congress: "I responded in what I thought was the most truthful, or least untruthful manner"
#11 National Security Council spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden: "The president has full faith in director Clapper and his leadership of the intelligence community"
#12 White House press secretary Jay Carney: "...Clapper has been straight and direct in the answers that he's given, and has actively engaged in an effort to provide more information about the programs that have been revealed through the leak of classified information"
#13 Dianne Feinstein, the chairwoman of the Senate intelligence committee: "There is no more direct or honest person than Jim Clapper."
#14 Gus Hunt, the chief technology officer at the CIA: "We fundamentally try to collect everything and hang onto it forever."
#15 Barack Obama: "Nobody is listening to your telephone calls."
#16 Keith Alexander, director of the National Security Agency: "We do not see a tradeoff between security and liberty."
#17 An exchange between NSA director Keith Alexander and U.S. Representative Hank Johnson in March 2012...
JOHNSON: Does the NSA routinely intercept American citizens’ emails?
ALEXANDER: No.
JOHNSON: Does the NSA intercept Americans’ cell phone conversations?
ALEXANDER: No.
JOHNSON: Google searches?
ALEXANDER: No.
JOHNSON: Text messages?
ALEXANDER: No.
JOHNSON: Amazon.com orders?
ALEXANDER: No.
JOHNSON: Bank records?
ALEXANDER: No.
#18 Deputy White House press secretary Dana Perino: "The intelligence activities undertaken by the United States government are lawful, necessary and required to protect Americans from terrorist attacks"
#19 U.S. Senator Saxby Chambliss: "This is nothing new. It has proved meritorious because we have gathered significant information on bad guys and only on bad guys over the years."
#20 Former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton on NSA leaker Edward Snowden: "Let me ask, who died and made him king? Who gave him the authority to endanger 300 million Americans? That's not the way it works, and if he thinks he can get away with that, he's got another think coming."
#21 Senior spokesman for the NSA Don Weber: "Given the nature of the work we do, it would be irresponsible to comment on actual or alleged operational issues; therefore, we have no information to provide"
#22 The White House website: "My administration is committed to creating an unprecedented level of openness in government. We will work together to ensure the public trust and establish a system of transparency, public participation, and collaboration."
Right now, the NSA is building a data collection center out in Utah that is so massive that it is hard to describe with words. It is going to cost 40 million dollars a year just to provide the energy needed to run it. According to a 2012 Wired article entitled "The NSA Is Building the Country’s Biggest Spy Center (Watch What You Say)", this data center will contain "the complete contents of private emails, cell phone calls, and Google searches" in addition to "parking receipts, travel itineraries, bookstore purchases" and anything else that the NSA decides to collect...

Under construction by contractors with top-secret clearances, the blandly named Utah Data Center is being built for the National Security Agency. A project of immense secrecy, it is the final piece in a complex puzzle assembled over the past decade. Its purpose: to intercept, decipher, analyze, and store vast swaths of the world’s communications as they zap down from satellites and zip through the underground and undersea cables of international, foreign, and domestic networks. The heavily fortified $2 billion center should be up and running in September 2013. Flowing through its servers and routers and stored in near-bottomless databases will be all forms of communication, including the complete contents of private emails, cell phone calls, and Google searches, as well as all sorts of personal data trails—parking receipts, travel itineraries, bookstore purchases, and other digital “pocket litter.” It is, in some measure, the realization of the “total information awareness” program created during the first term of the Bush administration—an effort that was killed by Congress in 2003 after it caused an outcry over its potential for invading Americans’ privacy.

The goal is to know as much about everyone on the planet as possible.
And the NSA does not keep this information to itself. As an article in USA Today recently reported, the NSA shares the data that it collects with other government agencies "as a matter of practice"...

As a matter of practice, the NSA regularly shares its information — known as "product" in intelligence circles — with other intelligence groups.

So when the NSA collects information about you, there is a very good chance that the FBI, the CIA, the Department of Homeland Security and the IRS will have access to it as well.
But the U.S. government is not the only one collecting data on American citizens.
Guess who else has been collecting massive amounts of data on the American people?
Barack Obama.
According to those that have seen it, the "Obama database" is unlike anything that any politician has ever put together before. According to CNSNews.com, U.S. Representative Maxine Waters says that this database "will have information about everything on every individual"...

"The president has put in place an organization that contains a kind of database that no one has ever seen before in life," she added. "That’s going to be very, very powerful."
Martin asked if Waters if she was referring to "Organizing for America."
"That’s right, that’s right," Waters said. "And that database will have information about everything on every individual in ways that it’s never been done before."
Waters said the database would also serve future Democratic candidates seeking the presidency.

Perhaps this helps to explain why so many big donors got slapped with IRS audits immediately after they wrote big checks to the Romney campaign.
We are being told to "trust" Barack Obama and the massive government surveillance grid that is being constructed all around us, but there has been example after example of government power being grossly abused in recent years.
A lot of Americans say that they do not care if the government is watching them because they do not have anything to hide, but is there anyone out there that would really not mind the government watching them and listening to them 24 hours a day?
For example, it has been documented that NSA workers eavesdropped on conversations between U.S. soldiers serving in Iraq and their loved ones back home. Some of these conversations involved very intimate talk between husbands and wives. The following is from a 2008 ABC News story...

Faulk says he and others in his section of the NSA facility at Fort Gordon routinely shared salacious or tantalizing phone calls that had been intercepted, alerting office mates to certain time codes of "cuts" that were available on each operator's computer.

"Hey, check this out," Faulk says he would be told, "there's good phone sex or there's some pillow talk, pull up this call, it's really funny, go check it out. It would be some colonel making pillow talk and we would say, 'Wow, this was crazy'," Faulk told ABC News.

Faulk said he joined in to listen, and talk about it during breaks in Back Hall's "smoke pit," but ended up feeling badly about his actions.

Is this really what we want the future of America to look like?
Do we really want the government to watch us and listen to us during our most intimate moments?
Feel free to express what you think about this NSA spying scandal by posting a comment below...

http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/a...spying-scandal

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

Is it More Treasonous to Violate the Constitution or to Expose Those Violations?

Freda Art

Eric Blair
Activist Post

In a free society the government is supposed to be open and transparent while the citizens enjoy privacy. What, then, do you call a society where the government is ultra secretive and all citizens are spied on by the state?

Establishment pundits are frantically attempting to make the NSA spy scandal story about whether the whistleblower is a hero or a traitor instead of debating the real issue -- whether broad government spying on U.S. citizens violates their Constitutional rights.

This divide-and-distract strategy has long been used to protect the real criminals to a free society. Some officials are taking the extreme position that the NSA whistleblower, Edward Snowden, committed treason by releasing proof of what most Americans already suspected, that their every move is being spied on by their government.

These officials, like Rep. Peter King (R-NY) and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), also happen to be the staunchest advocates for destroying the Bill of Rights, the Fourth Amendment in particular. Snowden broke a corporate disclosure contract; these officials broke their oath to the Constitution. Who are the real traitors here?


Establishment vs. Rebels

TheYoungTurks·15,070 videos

Director of National Intelligence (DNI), James Clapper, claims that a leaked court document proving the government is colluding with communications companies to spy on Americans causes 'irreversible harm' to national security, and that the leaker should be prosecuted under the Espionage Act.

This is the same James Clapper that lied under oath to Congress when Senator Ron Wyden asked him in a Senate hearing this March, "Does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?"


'Does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?'

BigChannelNews·623 videos


Bradley Manning is facing espionage charges for allegedly revealing war crimes to the public, while the actual war criminals walk around scot-free. There's another case where a hacker who exposed a rapist may face more jail time than the rapist. How did our society become so inverted?

Despite the best efforts by the establishment to make whistleblowers out to dangerous criminals, the real criminals are those who are violating the rights of innocent people in a free society.

What we need now are not more whistleblowers, but more oath keepers to arrest these enemies of America.

Read other articles by Eric Blair Here

http://www.activistpost.com/2013/06/...o-violate.html




Hmm-mm think they are circling the wagons??????